March 8, 2024 — My first blog, actually, was a 2005 exam essay on Same Sex Marriage for a Family Law class. It was 3000-words, full cited. In summary, it declared (in memorandum style) that a ‘marriage’ between persons of the same sex was void ab initio and in direct conflict with rules of succession. Consider, for example, that two biologicals of the same sex must, by laws of nature, pursue progeny/reproduction, through one ‘donor’ or entity, i.e., outside wedlock. Therefore, any succession would be ‘out of wedlock,’ illegitimate. This essay created an uproar amongst teachers and the administration. I was forced . . . compelled . . . to leave, dropout if you will.

I also predicted, with dire warnings, that full ‘equal protection’ of sodomites would result in their organized campaigns to lure and corrupt our children.

Today I am a recovering law addict. I still follow the law, argue it. But, at nearly 70-years of age am mostly interested in physical therapy, walking 5 miles . . . biking 20 . . . restoring my ‘gait’ and endurance enough to pursue photography.

ONE OF THE FIRST ‘BIRTHERS’

From my first blog on Obama’s Article II eligibility February of 2009, to my most recent one January of 2011, my research has been relied upon by several attorneys and two authors.

While Phil Berg did not agree with my conclusion that Obama was a citizen at birth, Orly Taitz and Mario Apuzzo have used my research for legal filings and blog content.

If you read my first blog, ‘Barack Hussein Obama — A Natural Born British Subject,’ and compare it to Chapter 5 of Aaron Klein’s ‘Manchurian Candidate,’ you might see a resemblance.

A book being released Spring of 2011 relied heavily on my research and legal analysis, up to my January 2011 blog.

I was the first legal analyst to figure out how Obama could have gotten a Hawaiian C.O.L.B. without a  birth certificate, or being born in Hawaii.

My article on Senator Ted Cruz’s presidential eligility, totally misunderstood by the editor. It has nothing to do with the Women’s Rights Movement! The new statutes since 1922 were to aid ‘repatriation’ of U.S. citizenship to women married to foreign husbands. In time, the statutes stretched so far as to be ‘dual citizenship,’ the 1952 INA cited in the article conferring retroactive citizenship to her children once she returned to the United States. The only departure from tradition in these new laws was allowing the mother to choose her former citizenship for the children over that of the natural father. This was originally for when the father abandoned the family, but now they could ‘flip a coin’ or claim ‘dual citizenship’ (not a popular concept, split allegiances) depending on circumstances of residency or travel with the father.

https://www.wnd.com/2016/02/ted-cruzs-eligibility-tied-to-womens-rights-movement/ 

Update February 24, 2024–It is now nearing the end of the disasterous Biden presidency. From Day 1 he has undermined our economy, national security, our borders . . . is he working for the Russians and Chinese? It certainly seems like it. And, he was well paid! As for my health, due to treatment ‘delayed, i.e., denied’ I ended up in the ER twice and almost died. It took five years to get my strength back, but the determination to undo the damage also helped with the neurological condition, Guillaine-Barre’. I got off three heart medications and worked my way up to bicycling 20 miles. I regularly walk five miles.

My research on organized mail ballot fraud got the attention of some editors, authors and politicians, but they are doing nothing. It also got the attention of Facebook. Last month they ‘suspended’ my account indefinitely.