NEW YEARS MESSAGE

I’m a paralegal researcher. My experience was in personal injury law, constitutional law, and immigration and nationality. My intent was law school, but my class essays were considered ‘hate speech’ and my grades were slashed.

This isn’t hate speech, but the law and Judeo-Christian principles that are the foundation of our constitutional republic.

My research was used by NY Times bestselling authors and I was published once under my own byline, revealing the legal basis for Republican Ted Cruz being able to claim ‘citizenship at birth’ when he was born in Canada to a Cuban father.

My first formal blog was in 2005, which was picked up by a law school professor and cited in his class syllabus. But I started blogging regularly in 2009, writing about health insurance, Barack Obama, and Islam.

My New Years Message is about Islam in America.

The Democrats, starting with Ted Kennedy, undermined our immigration system, essentially breaking it. But Islamic immigrants are unique in that their religion makes them totally incompatible and ineligible for immigration and naturalization.

Recent news concerns the Somali asylum seekers defrauding our social services and welfare system in the billions–and that number approaching trillions when other states and other immigrant groups are considered–but it demands our attention to not only Somalis, but eventually all Muslims in America.

HERE IS THE LAW FROM OUR IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT BARRING IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION OF MUSLIMS

A religion that preaches the genocide or oppression of other religions does NOT have constitutional rights. A religion that doesn’t respect or accept a constitutional republic but preaches its own set of laws (Sharia) and war against all infidel nations (Jihad) is barred from U.S. visa allocation and citizenship.

8 USC 1424 (INA § 313) prohibits the naturalization of individuals who are opposed to the government or laws of the United States, or who support totalitarian forms of government. This law ensures that only those who are committed to the principles of our constitutional republic can become U.S. citizens.

A reading of history and the Koran itself makes it clear that a religion that preaches the killing of Christians and Jews does NOT belong in a Judeo-Christian society. This killing, conversion, submission of Christians and Jews, and all other religions, is the fundamental principle of the Muslim ‘religion.’

The INA also prohibits polygamous cultures, and with 57 Islamic states and the Hadiths promoting polygamy as a religious tenet if not obligation, the INS looks suspiciously at Muslim applicants for citizenship. See Title 8 Ch 1 Sub Ch C Part 316 §316.10 (b)(2)(ix). See also 8 USC 1182 (10).

Over 80% of Somalis are on public assistance and getting free healthcare. It is established fact that many Somali men have multiple wives, hiding them under Sharia law. They even marry their first cousins in order to produce more children and ‘rape’ our system for food, medical care, and free housing.

Is this bigotry or racism? No. Back in the 1800’s Mormons, in what is now Utah, desired admission of their territory into the Union. They were denied statehood until their religion removed polygamy as a religious practice.

CONCLUSION:

My legal analysis is simple, but most Americans won’t accept it. However, the very survival of our state economies and the constitutional republic itself requires mass deportation of all Somalis, and denaturalization of citizenship.

What about their native born U.S. citizen children? Under U.S. law, when a legal parent denaturalizes and returns to their former national identity, their minor children follow. However, under the Perkins vs Elg (1939) case, a father who LEGALLY naturalized had children who also became citizens. [Note: Elg’s father naturalized in 1906 and she was born in 1907, which made Elg not only a native-born (not a term of art in U.S. law) but a natural born citizen.] When the father returned to his Swedish nationality, moving back to Sweden, his children’s nationality also became Swedish. So, Maria lost her U.S. citizenship through naturalization as a minor following that of her father.

The court, however, determined that Maria Elg had a right to return to the United States and reclaim her native-born ‘birthright’ citizenship. However, only congress had the power to make naturalization law, not the Supreme Court. If Maria, as an adult, wanted to reclaim her U.S. citizenship abandoned by the father, specific operations of naturalization law were required. In some cases, a five-year continuous residency between ages 14 and 22 were mandated. This is how Barack Obama regained his U.S. citizenship moving back to the U.S. from Indonesia. Obama maintained his Indonesian nationality until he fulfilled this residency requirement.

The issue of birthright citizenship compounds the Somali deportation issue. Birthright citizenship was created, unconstitutionally, by the 1898 U.S. Supreme Court. So, Somali children born in the U.S. may claim U.S. citizenship and a ‘right of return,’ but their claim is based on unconstitutional law, plus their parents’ citizenship rights were reversed based on the aforementioned statutes and massive fraud.

Birthright Citizenship, long debated and denied by legal scholars, will be before the U.S. Supreme Court sometime this year.