66 responses to “MUSLIMS IN AMERICA”

1. 

   prsmithsr

   January 1, 2026 at 7:47 pm

   l disagree that Cruz is eligible. I disagree with your definition of ‘natural born citizen’. That said, I agree 100% with your opinion of Somalis and Islamists who do not belong in our country. They should receive no public benefits and should be deported forthwith.

   Reply
   1. 

      paraleaglenm

      January 1, 2026 at 8:01 pm

      If you read my WND article, I make the point that his statutory ‘citizenship at birth’ did NOT satisfy the ‘natural born citizenship’ requirement for the presidency. His citizenship was ‘by operation of naturalization law’ and conferred post nati, not at birth but when his mother repatriated.

      It is a shame that Ted Cruz, a brilliant legal mind, did not pick up on this when we were crying out that Obama was not a natural born citizen. Then, we wouldn’t have had Obama in the White House and all these Somalis defrauding our social services.

      So, we are in agreement.

      Reply
      1. 

         prsmithsr

         January 1, 2026 at 8:20 pm

         I stand corrected. It is McCain and then Trump who anger me for not filing suit against Obama and Cruz to put a stop to the illegal activity. That should have gone to the SCOTUS to put the definition of ‘natural born citizen’ to bed once and for all.

2. 

   paraleaglenm

   January 1, 2026 at 9:21 pm

   The McCain issue went to a joint session and they came up with the correct answer. He was eligible because his father was a U.S. citizen. Place of Birth or U.S. native birth didn’t enter into the equation. It was SR 511.

   We tried like hell to bring the same question up. Like the Somali fraud, politicians are afraid of being labeled racist.

   Reply
3. 

   The Roman Church created Islam? – Paralegalnm's Blog

   March 18, 2026 at 7:29 pm

   […] [6] “8 USC 1424 (INA § 313) prohibits the naturalization of individuals who are opposed to the government or laws of the United States. This law ensures that only those who are committed to the principles of our constitutional republic can become U.S. citizens. The INA also prohibits polygamous cultures, and with 57 Islamic states and the Hadiths promoting polygamy as a religious tenet if not obligation, the INS looks suspiciously at Muslim applicants for citizenship. See Title 8 Ch 1 Sub Ch C Part 316 §316.10 (b)(2)(ix). See also 8 USC 1182 (10).” https://paraleaglenm.com/2026/01/01/muslims-in-america/ […]

   Reply
4. 

   moshe kerr

   June 2, 2026 at 4:55 pm

   Can you say: “Avoda Zarah sucks”?

   The 2nd commandment forbids any and all comparisons to anything in the Heavens, Earth, or Seas. Words convey ideas just as do all forms of פסל. פסל inclusive of “word images” based upon the Golden Calf/אלהים. The כלל second commandment of Sinai defined through the פרט of the Golden Calf אלהים – פסל word translation! פסל does not translate into carved idol any more than “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s.” fulfills the words of the prophets! Θεός (Theos) no different from אלהים\Golden Calf!

   The second commandment indeed prohibits any representations or comparisons to God, explicitly rejecting idolatry in all forms—physical, verbal, and conceptual. This includes any attempt to reduce the divine essence to human understandings or depictions. The understanding of פסל extends beyond the טיפש פשט “carved idols.” The gospel parallel between Θεός (Theos) with אלהים (Golden Calf) exposes the fundamental negative commandment which curses avoda zara. Attempts to restrict avoda zara to graven images, the prophets utterly mocked in total absolute contempt. This same vomit equally applies to the theological nonsense called “Monotheism”.

   Neither the ancient Greeks or Romans or Church or Mosque ever to this very day accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai – to pursue justice: fair compensation of damages through common law courts of law. תורה לא בשמים היא. Pirkei Avot instructs in ג:ב — כל אדם שמביט למעלה ולמטה ולפנים ואחור – טוב לו שלא נברא. The NT simple a cheap counterfeit fraud. אלהים and Θεός (Theos) serve as linguistic representations – both of which communicate “interpretations” “beliefs” “theologies” about God(s)! Isaiah openly mocked wooden carved idols made from wood used to heat ones’ home!

   Therefore the Torah restricts “faith” to צדק צדק תרדוף. The utter nonsense of the gospel parallel between Θεός (Theos) with אלהים (Golden Calf) exposes the fundamental negative commandment which curses avoda zara, specifically through the gospel of “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to Θεός what is Θεοῦ..” Only the gospel “Lord’s Prayer” which directs prayers unto Heaven rather than within the heart expresses greater total ignorance and stupidity.

   Human beings cannot comprehend the divine any more than a worm can comprehend human civilization. Therefore any attempt to conceptualize, describe, or “image” God — even in words — Av tumah avoda zarah. The Torah explicitly defines the differences which separate tohor from tuma spirits! To restrict פסל blind to the distinction which separates tohor from tuma spirits – simply טיפש פשט. Greek Θεός and Hebrew אלהים both – human attempts to conceptualize that which Man simply cannot grasp much less understand. Torah never commands “believe in God.” Torah commands “do justice,” “walk humbly,” “remember,” “act,” “judge,” “pursue.”

   The Second Commandment prohibits any human attempt to conceptualize, describe, imagine, or linguistically represent the divine. Therefore פסל includes not only statues but all human God‑concepts — including אלהים, Θεός, “monotheism,” and theological language itself. The sin of the Golden Calf teaches that the ערב רב שאין להם יראת אלהים – did not worship “another god”; they worshipped a prepresentation of the God of Sinai. No different from later avoda zara which worships the stars as representatives of the Gods as Gods in their own right.

   Isaiah command straight mussar: ואל מי תדמיון אל? No likeness, analogy, metaphor, conceptualization, theological creed/linguistic labels (אלהים, Θεός, Deus, Trinity, Tawhid, Allah) can jump from finite to beyond infinite. The gospel counterfeit introduces a philisophical argument; nothing more other than the essence of avodah zarah, dressed up as political theology.

   Torah Commands Justice, not Belief: לא תטה משפט; לא תכיר פנים; לא תעשוק; לא תגזול; לא תעמוד על דם רעך. Neither the church or mosque has ever “fulfilled” this prophetic mussar. The Sinai revelation commands faith as the righteous pursuit of justice through Sanhedrin Torah mandated common law courtrooms.

   Reply
   1. 

      paraleaglenm

      June 10, 2026 at 12:16 pm

      I don’t study the Talmud, as it is a purely Jewish convention of essays written after the diaspora by rabbis, for rabbis.

      As for idolatry, didn’t God create man in His own image? Or is that reverse idolatry?

      For those who follow the Christ, he was reported to be God’s son, fully approved in his obediance/unity and understanding of that which is holy.
      The Christ summed up the Sinai law into, Love God, and Love your Neighbor as Yourself . . . upon this all the law is based.’ Pardon the paraphrasing.
      And this is how the Christ summed up how the Jews who followed him, lived amongst and taught the Gentiles until Christianity became the majority religion,
      and Israel its source.

      Unfortunately, the pagan emperor of Rome put his finger on the scale at Nicaea and paganized the Christian religion introducing worship of Mary, the Crucifix,
      the ‘Divine Godhead of the Christ’ being equal to that of God Almighty, the Father.

      Was this Roman influence the apostasy prophesized, and the ‘Man of Lawlessness’ coming forth out of it Mohammad, who in ten years took Arabia and in another 25
      years, his followers destroyed almost all of Christendom and the Jews?

      There is nothing ‘holy’ about Islam, the Koran merely a journal of verses in support of the rape, looting, ravaging, mass murder, and assassinations during the 10
      years of Mohammad’s ‘mission,’ to destroy the idolators and polytheists, i.e., the worshippers of images, the crucifix, and the Trinity.

      Now we are dealing with the Muslims again, guided in perfidy and mass murder, terror, as instructed by the Koran. There is no peace or reformation, only blood, until
      that book is destroyed.

      Reply
      1. 

         moshe kerr

         June 10, 2026 at 2:38 pm

         Howdy paraglenm. You open with a narrow “Ego I” narrow declaration which contradicts itself. Here let me show you what another acutual contradiction looks like. Chazal (the sages of my people) refers to the Mishna as the Oral Torah. How could rabbi Yechuda write down the Oral Torah spirits which passed before him at Horev on Yom Kippur ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון etc? :)))

      2. 

         moshe kerr

         June 11, 2026 at 8:56 am

         The resurrection from the dead: The rise of the Jewish state following 2000+ years of exile.

         Hebrews 12:2 the ultimate substitute theology which the Roman forgers and counterfeits attempted to cause Israel to forget the Torah no different than as did the Syrian Greeks, approximately 100 years earlier! Clearly, no Xtian “believer” dressed upon in the costume of a “scholar” has ever weighed this possibility; due to the simple facts that believers hold: Don’t confuse me with the facts! I have my religion!!

         The early church rewrote or reinterpreted Hebrew scripture to replace Torah with a new “substitute” religion, similar to the Seleucid attempt under Antiochus IV – a form of supersessionism — the idea that the Church replaces Israel. They loved assimilated Alexandrian Philo and the Roman Kapo Flavius Josephus. The latter’s book Antiquities 18.63–64:
         “About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he was one who performed surprising deeds and was a teacher of people who accepted the truth gladly. He won over many Jews and many of the Greeks. He was the Christ. And when, upon the accusation of the principal men among us, Pilate condemned him to the cross, those who had first loved him did not cease. For he appeared to them alive again on the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other marvelous things concerning him. And the tribe of Christians, so called after him, has still to this day not disappeared.”

         The priest most often accused of having forged or interpolated this paragraph – Eusebius of Caesarea (4th century); after Xtianity became the Roman Empire’s favored religion (4th century). Xtianity as the state religion of Rome censored all manuscripts; scribal alterations in monasteries could spread modified readings. The church lost this power with the 15th Century invension of the Gutenberg printing press. But even contemporary scholarship generally agree the this double D-cup insertion came via Eusebius’ quotations which later monk scribes inserted into the actual texts. In 1971, scholar Shlomo Pines highlighted a 10th-century Arabic version of the text by the historian Agapius, which lacks the overtly dogmatic Christian interpolations, suggesting a neutral original baseline text existed before Roman scribal alteration.

         Xtian “tripe rhetoric\\propaganda” declares – the good noise gospel: “JeZeus fulfilled the words of the prophets”! Despite never such similar language anywhere across any of the Hebrew T’NaCH sealed masoret Books; which the Church first thing, once the State religion of Rome – discarded and cast upon the dung heaps of History. Order the opening central theme of the בראשית aggadah story of creation.

         The Torah ‘order’ based upon a clear פ – ס \ chapter – subchapter system which the later Books of both Prophets and Holy Writing likewise obey. This Order akin for the sace of a physical comparison to a “Fach/space-gap” — a compound term used in architecture, preservation, and building-technical contexts to describe the intentional or resulting gap between two built elements or between a building element and an adjacent space. What separates a NaCH sugya from another NaCH sugya? A space-gap.

         The treif bible church translations and koran false prophet (((Neither forgery understands the Torah concept learned directly from Moshe Rabbeinu that prophets commandment mussar to all generations. Prophets do NOT foretell the future; herein separates the mystic Book of Daniel from the Books of the Prophets!))), organized around alien and utterly foreign chapter\verse substitute order or poetic stanzas.

         This change of Order compounded with the insertion of word based Names of God like JeZeus or Allah. Both foreign alien counterfeit substitute religion belief in “their” Universal Monotheistic God(s) over Torah common law as faith – תורה לא בשמים היא. Changing the order of texts produces radical consequences God does not mean nor refer to Dog. ברית does not compare to covenant because the former requires שם ומלכות – meaning the oath dedication of Oral Torah middot spirits לשמה which both the church and mosque emphatically deny that such spirits even exist! אהבה does note remotely compare to agape love. משפט צדק defines justice – common law courts ruling fair compensation of damages – does not compare to Paul’s addiction to Jezeus who atones for the eternal guilt trip of Adam’s original sin. A גר צדק does not remotely resemble to a Pauline uncircumcised Philistine; despite the church and the mosque huge as Goliath!

         The radical change of Shaul the talmid of Rabban Gamliel HaNassi to Paul – exceptional. Paul’s writing preandidate the gospel texts themselves. A dog without a nose, even that animal could smell the coming revolts first in Alexandria Egypt and later in Judea! The Hanukkah model of how Yechuda Maccabbee defeated and achieved victory over the Syrian Greek empire clearly both Gamliel and the generals of Rome weighed and considered. Any interpretation of ancient history which ignores this fundamental precedent – not serious scholarship.

         Shaul as a talmid of Gamliel traveled to Damascus and get’s stoned! That red flag together with the “stoning of Stephen”, two primary witnesses that something stinks in Denmark! Both men according to Torah law would require a trial before a city of refuge small sanhedrin court. The Goyim manner of “stoning” a direct Torah violation! The Talmud deliniates 4 separat types of death penalty. Stone people on the street without a Capital Crimes trail, no connection to any of the 4 types of Capital Crimes death sentences.

         That Paul got up and walked to Damascus on his own power strongly indicates the “stoning” a set-up which would permit him to infiltrate the Xtian camp as a fellow converted believer! In Damascus Paul preached “not under the law” “circumcision” not a commandment for Goyim. In Rome Paul preached “worship JeZeus the son of God” when Romans worshipped Caesar as “the son of God”. Both cases suggest that the intention of Paul to inject a form of Monotheism into Roman society to promote Civil War!

         The Roman counterfeit of JeZeus through the gospels promotes a false messiah dogmatism aimed to promote the many and hostile sects already fighting among themselves to further splinter and divide. “Divide and conquer” a gospel famous term of reference.

         The earliest gospel of Mark – written in Rome about 70 CE. This gospel profoundly suspect. Simply because the destruction of Herod’s Temple – NEWS! The killing of a criminal through cruxifiction – common/NOT NEWS. Paul as a deliberate Sanhedrin/Gamliel agent! Based upon Yechuda Makkabbee declaring his loyalty to the “real king of Syria”. Just as Yechuda sought to undermine (shatter the ethical containment force) the government of Antiochus IV, so too Paul, based upon this model sought to do the same within Rome itself.

         This idea that revolution requires shattering the ethical containment force of a civilization, perhaps the “soul of the people” requires two fundamental legs to stand upon. 1) Reject the current government order. 2) Reject the religion of the current government order. Examples: the American Revolution established citizens having rights vs. serfs as slaves. The French revolution rejected both the king and the Catholic church replaced by the church of reason! The Bolshevik revolution, modeled itself after the French revolution. Lenin and Troskii both rejected the 300 year Czarist regime together with the Eastern Orthodox Church. The Nazi revolution too rejected the British French dictated peace together with its imposed democratic government. Likewise the Nazis utterly despised the church and favored the Arian ancient religions. The Iranian revolution too rejected both the Shah and western liberal values.

         Bottom line: Post Shoah NEVER AGAIN. Goyim racism as expressed through both “Jewish Problem” and “Dhimmi”, terminated with the rise and establishment of the Jewish state. Where was JeZeus during the Shoah. Why has Allah suffered defeat after humiliating defeat from the Jews who rule over Arab refugee populations?

      3. 

         moshe kerr

         June 11, 2026 at 10:13 am

         I’d really like to hear your take on:

         The resurrection from the dead: The rise of the Jewish state following 2000+ years of exile.

         Hebrews 12:2 the ultimate substitute theology which the Roman forgers and counterfeits attempted to cause Israel to forget the Torah no different than as did the Syrian Greeks, approximately 100 years earlier! Clearly, no Xtian “believer” dressed upon in the costume of a “scholar” has ever weighed this possibility; due to the simple facts that believers hold: Don’t confuse me with the facts! I have my religion!!

         The early church rewrote or reinterpreted Hebrew scripture to replace Torah with a new “substitute” religion, similar to the Seleucid attempt under Antiochus IV – a form of supersessionism — the idea that the Church replaces Israel. They loved assimilated Alexandrian Philo and the Roman Kapo Flavius Josephus. The latter’s book Antiquities 18.63–64:
         “About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he was one who performed surprising deeds and was a teacher of people who accepted the truth gladly. He won over many Jews and many of the Greeks. He was the Christ. And when, upon the accusation of the principal men among us, Pilate condemned him to the cross, those who had first loved him did not cease. For he appeared to them alive again on the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other marvelous things concerning him. And the tribe of Christians, so called after him, has still to this day not disappeared.”

         The priest most often accused of having forged or interpolated this paragraph – Eusebius of Caesarea (4th century); after Xtianity became the Roman Empire’s favored religion (4th century). Xtianity as the state religion of Rome censored all manuscripts; scribal alterations in monasteries could spread modified readings. The church lost this power with the 15th Century invension of the Gutenberg printing press. But even contemporary scholarship generally agree the this double D-cup insertion came via Eusebius’ quotations which later monk scribes inserted into the actual texts. In 1971, scholar Shlomo Pines highlighted a 10th-century Arabic version of the text by the historian Agapius, which lacks the overtly dogmatic Christian interpolations, suggesting a neutral original baseline text existed before Roman scribal alteration.

         Xtian “tripe rhetoric\\propaganda” declares – the good noise gospel: “JeZeus fulfilled the words of the prophets”! Despite never such similar language anywhere across any of the Hebrew T’NaCH sealed masoret Books; which the Church first thing, once the State religion of Rome – discarded and cast upon the dung heaps of History. Order the opening central theme of the בראשית aggadah story of creation.

         The Torah ‘order’ based upon a clear פ – ס \ chapter – subchapter system which the later Books of both Prophets and Holy Writing likewise obey. This Order akin for the sace of a physical comparison to a “Fach/space-gap” — a compound term used in architecture, preservation, and building-technical contexts to describe the intentional or resulting gap between two built elements or between a building element and an adjacent space. What separates a NaCH sugya from another NaCH sugya? A space-gap.

         The treif bible church translations and koran false prophet (((Neither forgery understands the Torah concept learned directly from Moshe Rabbeinu that prophets commandment mussar to all generations. Prophets do NOT foretell the future; herein separates the mystic Book of Daniel from the Books of the Prophets!))), organized around alien and utterly foreign chapter\verse substitute order or poetic stanzas.

         This change of Order compounded with the insertion of word based Names of God like JeZeus or Allah. Both foreign alien counterfeit substitute religion belief in “their” Universal Monotheistic God(s) over Torah common law as faith – תורה לא בשמים היא. Changing the order of texts produces radical consequences God does not mean nor refer to Dog. ברית does not compare to covenant because the former requires שם ומלכות – meaning the oath dedication of Oral Torah middot spirits לשמה which both the church and mosque emphatically deny that such spirits even exist! אהבה does note remotely compare to agape love. משפט צדק defines justice – common law courts ruling fair compensation of damages – does not compare to Paul’s addiction to Jezeus who atones for the eternal guilt trip of Adam’s original sin. A גר צדק does not remotely resemble to a Pauline uncircumcised Philistine; despite the church and the mosque huge as Goliath!

         The radical change of Shaul the talmid of Rabban Gamliel HaNassi to Paul – exceptional. Paul’s writing preandidate the gospel texts themselves. A dog without a nose, even that animal could smell the coming revolts first in Alexandria Egypt and later in Judea! The Hanukkah model of how Yechuda Maccabbee defeated and achieved victory over the Syrian Greek empire clearly both Gamliel and the generals of Rome weighed and considered. Any interpretation of ancient history which ignores this fundamental precedent – not serious scholarship.

         Shaul as a talmid of Gamliel traveled to Damascus and get’s stoned! That red flag together with the “stoning of Stephen”, two primary witnesses that something stinks in Denmark! Both men according to Torah law would require a trial before a city of refuge small sanhedrin court. The Goyim manner of “stoning” a direct Torah violation! The Talmud deliniates 4 separat types of death penalty. Stone people on the street without a Capital Crimes trail, no connection to any of the 4 types of Capital Crimes death sentences.

         That Paul got up and walked to Damascus on his own power strongly indicates the “stoning” a set-up which would permit him to infiltrate the Xtian camp as a fellow converted believer! In Damascus Paul preached “not under the law” “circumcision” not a commandment for Goyim. In Rome Paul preached “worship JeZeus the son of God” when Romans worshipped Caesar as “the son of God”. Both cases suggest that the intention of Paul to inject a form of Monotheism into Roman society to promote Civil War!

         The Roman counterfeit of JeZeus through the gospels promotes a false messiah dogmatism aimed to promote the many and hostile sects already fighting among themselves to further splinter and divide. “Divide and conquer” a gospel famous term of reference.

         The earliest gospel of Mark – written in Rome about 70 CE. This gospel profoundly suspect. Simply because the destruction of Herod’s Temple – NEWS! The killing of a criminal through cruxifiction – common/NOT NEWS. Paul as a deliberate Sanhedrin/Gamliel agent! Based upon Yechuda Makkabbee declaring his loyalty to the “real king of Syria”. Just as Yechuda sought to undermine (shatter the ethical containment force) the government of Antiochus IV, so too Paul, based upon this model sought to do the same within Rome itself.

         This idea that revolution requires shattering the ethical containment force of a civilization, perhaps the “soul of the people” requires two fundamental legs to stand upon. 1) Reject the current government order. 2) Reject the religion of the current government order. Examples: the American Revolution established citizens having rights vs. serfs as slaves. The French revolution rejected both the king and the Catholic church replaced by the church of reason! The Bolshevik revolution, modeled itself after the French revolution. Lenin and Troskii both rejected the 300 year Czarist regime together with the Eastern Orthodox Church. The Nazi revolution too rejected the British French dictated peace together with its imposed democratic government. Likewise the Nazis utterly despised the church and favored the Arian ancient religions. The Iranian revolution too rejected both the Shah and western liberal values.

         Bottom line: Post Shoah NEVER AGAIN. Goyim racism as expressed through both “Jewish Problem” and “Dhimmi”, terminated with the rise and establishment of the Jewish state. Where was JeZeus during the Shoah. Why has Allah suffered defeat after humiliating defeat from the Jews who rule over Arab refugee populations?

      4. 

         moshe kerr

         June 11, 2026 at 12:27 pm

         Time for Israel to conduct diplomacy originally established between Italian city-states rather than the post Shoah UN puke international law/Universal God.

         Classic Italian city-State diplomacy in no wise resembled “league of nations” or a universal moral authority to guarantee its existence. Security maintained and upheld through shifting alliances, military deterrence, and the creation of hard facts on the ground. The Italian states constantly fought to keep external empires (the French, the Holy Roman Empire) from dictating their internal borders.

         Post ’67 European interventions, expressed through the UN placing or removing its troops at a whim like as happened prior to the amazing Israel victory. Specifically 242,338,446,2334 resemble the 1939 White Paper which called for the establishment of a Palestinian state in 10 years following the war. Viewed from a geopolitical and historical standpoint, both the 1939 White Paper and the lineage of UNSC resolutions (242, 338, 446, 2334) incest screwing cousins; same DNA, different generation.! Elite-driven “great powers” attempt to dominate the balance of power in the Middle East – like France and Britain did when both Capitals attempted to seize control of the Suez Canal in 1956.

         The MacDonald White Paper – a disgusting throw the Jews under the bus betrayal, which gang banged the Balfour Declaration and directly contributed to FDR’s similar war-time closure of US borders to Jewish refugee populations condemned to brutal torture and death. None of the Allied victors ever once made the slightest attempt to bomb the rail lines leading to the death camps. Furthermore, the UN never tried Poop Eugenio Pacelli for war crimes. The Vatican did not denounce the slaughter of Rome’s Jews, did not publicly denounce the pogroms and death camps, made alliance with Nazi Germany like as did the Protestant Lutheran church! Post war the rat-lines to hide Nazi war-criminals from justice and the pogroms in Poland. The buck of responsibility stops with the Pope and the heads of Protestant churches – all of whom remained silent throughout the war.

         Post‑1967, the UN–European apparatus becomes the new pulpit of religious fanaticism. This new church preaches “international law”, imposing two-state solutions which always fail: India\Pakistan, the two Koreas, the two Vietnams etc. The UN treats the “original sin” of Israel/small satan defined as Jewish sovereignty beyond the Green Line! NEVER AGAIN rejects that Europe decides what is “legal” for their inherited racial insanity which Europe calls “their Jewish problem” that requires a European “Final Solution”.

         David Ben Gurion declared war against London following the White Paper abomination. The Irgun and Lehi together with the Haganah forced the British to return their League Palestine mandate back to the UN. Palestine ceased to exist in 1948. Goyim in far away lands do not determine the name of the Jewish state. Israel not a Protectorate of the UN not today not ever. Goyim do not possess any “international law” to limit Jewish sovereignty over our ancestral homelands. Jews not the poodle on a leashe, not of Europe nor of Arabs.

         White Paper land restrictions directly resemble to “illegal occupied territory” despite the cold hard fact that the PLO 1964 Charter only condemned ’48 Israel as “occupied territory”! The White Paper 10-Year Independent State: It explicitly envisioned the creation of a Arab-majority independent Arab Palestinian state within ten years, entirely subverting the goal of Jewish self-determination. All Arab-Israeli wars fought over the Arab rejection that dhimmi Jews have the right to self-determination.

         UNR 242 introduced the formula of “land for peace” and the “inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war.” Despite Prussia being carved up and divided between the Soviets and Poland! British illegal settlements in North Ireland; Frances seizure post WWI of Alyse Lorraine from the Germans. Just as the 1939 White Paper attempted to freeze the borders of Jewish growth pre-WWII, 242 utilized by international powers to establish that the 1949 Armistice Lines (the Green Line) as the absolute legal ceiling of Jewish territorial sovereignty.

         Resolution 446 (1979): Explicitly declared that Israel’s policy of establishing settlements in the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since 1967 has “no legal validity” and constitutes a serious obstruction to achieving a comprehensive peace. This resolution “assumes” the existence of a Palestinian state which later the UN GA and SC resolutions, akin to a whore in church, without shame publicly declared; as if a UN declaration establishes international law! This directly mirrors the land-purchase restrictions of the 1939 White Paper. Where the British said Jews could not buy land in Zone A or B of the Mandate.

         UN 2334 declares that any Jewish presence beyond the 1949 lines – a violation of international law. The underlying philosophy of foreign interventionism-imperialism becomes as clear as the Sun on a cloudless summer day! (1) The underlying philosophy of foreign interventionism becomes obvious to all who have any objectivity. The imposition of a two-state solution based strictly on the 1947/1949 paradigms. European-backed UN apparatus acting under the guise of international law. Just as the Jewish underground movements (Irgun, Lehi, and eventually the Haganah) realized after 1939 that British imperial law was an existential threat to survival—leading to a revolt against the Mandatory power—the post-1967 reality forced a similar realization regarding Catholic/UN dogmas.

         The international community’s insistence on treating the 1949 armistice lines as permanent borders functions exactly like the 1939 White Paper: an attempt by external global empires (then Britain, now the Western/UN bloc) to manage a indigenous conflict by placing an artificial ceiling on Jewish sovereignty. Independent Jewish sovereignty – not on probation anymore. The problem of dhimmi Arab refugees – not an Israeli problem. Israel gave citizenship to its Arab minority population. Not a single Arab or Muslim country has ever intergrated dhimmi Arab refugee populations and extended citizenship to them. The Oct 7th Gaza refugee crisis serves as check-mate proof to this fact.

         By keeping these dhimmi Arab refugee populations in a permanent state of statelessness inside generational refugee camps, the regional powers and the UN created a self-perpetuating demographic weapon. The October 7th crisis and its aftermath underscore that the refusal of regional neighbors to integrate these populations – not a failure of logistics – but a deliberate geopolitical strategy designed to maintain an unresolved existential challenge to Jewish sovereignty.

      5. 

         moshe kerr

         June 12, 2026 at 11:46 am

         Torah constitutional doctrine of the 2nd commandment

         Prophetic mussar interprets the k’vanna of 13 Oral Torah middot Spirits which Moshe heard at Horev following the calf abomination! To do this requires common law precedents which compare a NaCH sugya with a similar but different NaCH sgya/ot which contain the exact same order of Oral Torah middot. To interpret Oral Torah wisdom spirits – the rhetoric of the NT does not teach these wisdom skills.

         The NT—Paul included—does not present itself as a rabbinic legal interpreter of Mosaic Oral‑Torah middot or as engaging in NaCH sugya methodology; it operates with different “avoda zarah” categories and interpretive aims which promote not only a false messiah but JeZeus is God and dress this theology as prophesy fulfilled. The Pauline religious rhetoric flat out fails to differentiate statute law from common law. Paul and the NT do not use rabbinic sugya methodology or the formal “middot” precedent method; the NT introduces Greco‑Roman rhetorical forms, typology, & citation to foist the lie that any son of man/God can fulfill the words of the prophets – straight up avoda zara.

         A crystal clear example: the concept that a married woman could conceive through “virgin birth” the son of God; Hercules serves as a classic example of this av tuma avoda zarah. Paul’s letters repudiated brit melah but ignore the bi-polar kiddushin/get commandment from the Torah which the catholic virgin birth invalidates.

         The NT ignores the Torah commandment of Yibum where a man who dies without children the brother has a mitzva to marry his brothers’ wife – the story of Yechuda and Tamar. This latter example serves as evidence that just as the Torah commands divorce through get, equally so kiddushin the mitzva of transferring “title” to the baal that he will father the children of that union. In cases of divorce, get required which returns “title” back to the woman such that she can marry through kiddushin another Jew.

         This Torah implied backdrop (דיוק) the gospel narratives of Mary totally perverts. Paul as a student of Rabban Gamliel would most definitely known this fundamental Torah דאורייתא fundamental. His ‘not under the law’ rhetoric likewise conceal fundamental Torah commandments! Just as speaking “tongues” has no T’NaCH precedent so too the Pauline hype “not under the law” fails to differentiate Torah commandment of the status of a bastard son!

         The Pauline letters and later Gospel false messiah stories, establish an entirely new religious substitute theology belief system by which the later church introduced its NT\OT perversion as the opposite of accurate. Goyim simply do not compare to a grafted Kilayim (forbidden mixtures) as Paul suggests. Based upon the T’NaCH example of Ruth the ger tzeddick process rigorous.

         This day night divergence a historical fact. Does the Harry Potter false messiah gospels expose a Roman attempt to promote Jewish civil war among the already violently divided Jewish sects prior to the outbreak of the 66 Jewish revolt? Does Paul in turn function as an agent provocateur tasked by Rabban Gamliel to infiltrate and push-away and undermine the influence of this new heretical sect by preaching circumcision not a Torah commandment for Goyim in Damascus; while preaching to Romans to come worship the Son of God king of the Jews in the city of Rome. Impossible to know. Only that the writings of Paul clearly different from the other NT writers. And in point of fact, Paul’s “method” closely resembles to that of Yechuda Maccabee in his revolt against the Syrian Greeks.

         The famous Israeli spy Eli Cohen, like Paul – publicly executed. Spies by definition rely upon duplicity rather than making bold declarations to the enemy that they seek the destruction of that opposing enemy state. Consequently, there exists no physical evidence that Paul operated upon a secret agenda. Nonetheless the Pauline propaganda as codified in the NT did greatly contribute to the overthrow of the earlier Greek and Roman Gods. As such, this speculation as believable as Zeus giving birth to Hercules as a belief system.

         Whereas T’NaCH serves as common law which operates independent (as humanly possible) of any and all theological belief systems; for example the Talmud never once brings the 1st commandment שם השם. The NT\OT stand upon the Greek rhetoric bedrock of sand/fuzzy logic wherein the mobs believe language as inspired even though they do not understand that “tongue” – such as practiced in all Pentecostal churches; Xtianity and later Islam – both theological belief systems by the core. Whereas the Torah faith of justice rejects “belief” as something akin to accepting a bribe.

         Rome’s Achilles heel, Egypt the primary source of cheap bread. A unified Jewish revolts in Alexadria Egypt and Judea which expelled Roman legions from their home base in Syria – represented a nightmare threat to the known Roman empire.

         What proves the definitive fraud of both church and mosque the “by their fruits you shall know them” slander libel taxation without representation ghetto gulag Inquisition mentality which produced the Nazi Shoah.

         Torah as prophetic common law, trains the chosen Cohen people in the conquered land of Canaan to riteously pursue justice in remembrance of the judicial corruption of ancient Egyptian vertical courts which obeyed Par’o. Both NT/Islamic cult of personality belief-systems replace justice with mythical Gods not know to the Torah NaCH and Writings. Such foreign Universal God rhetoric, exercised through racial KKK – power structures, whose fruits for Am Yisrael utterly catastrophic down through the Ages. So cruel, that any attempt to dress them garments of nevu’a language, the very wolf dress in sheep garments; itself, both NT and Koran define the 2nd Sinai commandment. As such, when will Israel expunge this cancerous avoda zara from within the Jewish state? Starts with the rigid rejection of rhetoric slogans of belief in God – Jewish, Xtian, or Muslim. The righteous pursuit of justice defines the Constitutional Zionist Republic which mandates a Federal lateral common law judicial system which regulates akin to a bureaucratic regulations statute law, starting with belief in a Universal montheistic god in heaven.

         Interpreting the 2nd Sinai commandment “expunging avoda zara” not limited expelling foreign Goyim churches and mosques or even synagogues! Rather expelling the very idea that the State may coerce belief at all. Tzedek, tzedek tirdof the top dog (so to speak) of Zionism/Jewish self-determination.

      6. 

         paraleaglenm

         June 12, 2026 at 1:12 pm

         ” false messiah but JeZeus is God ”

         The NT is worth reading and it is a compilation of multiple witnesses, a legal affidavit if you will.

         King of the Jews? Well, his genealogy put him in the line of David.
         God walking the Earth? NOPE. None of the ‘gospels’ say this. In fact, the
         edict was to ‘worship the Creator, not the Created,’ and Jesus was born, a man, created
         by God the Father.

         The word(s) of the Christ opened the word of God up to the entire world! How many gentiles (or goyim as you prefer)
         read and study the Old Testament? Love Israel?

         But your ‘talmudic’ and rabbinic tradition is a closed and miserable sect of Judaism, hiding and cut off.

         The Trinity and Mariolatry was part of the paganization of Christianity by Rome. Peter was never in Rome, yet the Roman
         church created that myth and that Peter was the ‘rock’ of the church, the cornerstone. False. And many Christian bishops
         in the Mediterranean churches fought against the doctrine, the new ‘creed.’

         This paganization may be the ‘great apostasy’ predicted/prophesized by Paul to the Thessalonians, the result being the ‘Man
         of Lawlessness.’ (Mohammad?)

         Mohammad became a narcissistic messianic prophet who destroyed anyone who spoke against him, and rewarded anyone who fought for him.
         His soldiers were lustful after gold, silver, women, and blood. Just as Trump admits the U.S. has no ‘stomach for war,’ the Muslims
         love war and death more than life, and for any Muslim to admit otherwise, for peace, is their death sentence.

         So, that is what we are up against. How many Jews were genocided? How many did the Muslims massacre on their way to Empire? The Germans . . .
         Genghis Khan, Stalin, Mao . . . the brutality of man in a treacherous world, and yet Jews and Israelis are accused of genocide when they are only trying to defend their small
         nation, with enemies on every side and within? And, the translation and printing of the bible returning it to man, the Protestant Reformation (which denied the Trinity, which is
         why many U.S. founders are labeled as ‘deists’) in 1776 resulted in a small nation going from wood and horses to supersonic airplanes and spacecraft to the moon in 150-years!
         What empire or kingdom accomplished this in such a short time? What allowed it? Freedom? Capitalism? The turning away from despotic monarchs? The denial of the Papacy and Roman
         church? And, all this because of a return to the bible and true seeking of truth about Jesus and God!

         My blogs on Islam point out that because of the Trinitarians, there is an impasse between Muslims and Christians/Jews, and without education and enlightenment through the New
         Testament, blood and discord, great nations and peoples will be dragged down into the sewers of the so-called Third World.

         You are a sharp student, but you are still seeking the Truth. I hope you find it, and God allows you to see it for yourself.

      7. 

         moshe kerr

         June 13, 2026 at 7:56 pm

         The 4 gospels based upon Mark – written in Rome shortly after the destruction of Herod’s Temple.

      8. 

         moshe kerr

         June 14, 2026 at 7:47 am

         The phrase “מי שלמד תורה שלא לשמה, סופו ללמד לשמה” a Baraita found in the Gemara of Avodah Zarah 19a. What does it mean? The Sinai Life/Death blessing\curse revolves around ruling the land with justice vs. Par’o like judicial oppression in g’lut as the k’vanna of the bi-polar דיוק separation between לשמה – לא לשמה. Rabbi Yechuda compiled his Shas Mishna in 210 CE, some 75 years after the collapse of the Bar Kachba revolt. By the time that Rabbi Yechuda published the Mishna – the name of Judea – Emperor Hadrian, around 135 CE, had already renamed that conquered province to Syria Palaestina.

         By the time of Rabbi’s Mishna the Romans had already decided to expunge the land of the Jewish people like as did the Syrian Greeks whom the Hanukka benching in ברכת המזון condemns for attempting to cause Israel to forget the Torah. G’lut, based upon מצרים – לאו דוקא, therein means תורה לא לשמה. The Syrian Greeks the first to change the name of Judea unto Palestine. This fact exceptionally important because universes separate לא לשמה g’lut oppression from Sanhedrin Court justice לשמה. Sanhedrin court fundamentally and absolutely require Yovel freedom, based upon Pesach freedom, and brit melah as the sign of this brit to rule the land with justice צדק צדק תרדוף first established at the brit cut between the pieces with HaShem & Avram לשמה.

         The generation of Yehoshua established the other 3 Cities of Refuge with their small Sanhedrin Capital Crimes courts. However, the next generation abandoned this Torah and worshipped avoda zara other Gods; meaning the Tribes of Israel abandoned the Federal Mishkan as Central hub of the Great Sanhedrin and cities of refuge as the spokes small Sanhedrin capital crime courts! Whenever Israel abandons the righteous pursuit of justice in the conquered land of Canaan, qualifies as av tuma avoda zara.

         לא לשמה “ulterior motives” stands under the 2nd Sinai commandment of g’lut. לשמה “sake of Heaven” – dedicates the Oral Torah tohor middot אל רחום וחנון etc לשמה; herein defines Yermia’s ברית חדש and rabbi Yechuda’s בכל לבבך chiddush in ברכות; Mishna א:א which lears kre’a shma as tefillah דאורייתא in ארץ ישראל; acceptance of the yoke of the Kingdom of Heaven לשמה – the k’vanna time-oriented wisdom commandment which prioritizes tohor middot as the dominant spirits which rule the heart over av tuma “Esav – middot” — Yatzir Ha-Rah spirits of violence hatred without cause “avoda zarah”.

         By the time rabbi Yechuda compiled his Shas Mishna and how much more so the Bavli Talmud sealed around 450CE, the land of Judea no longer called by that name but rather Palestine; the Roman religion of Xtianity had expunged the brit cut between the pieces and replaced it with a Harry Potter messiah “son of God”. Then the Arab caliphate slaughtered and butchered the Roman empire in the Middle East and replaced the JeZeus God downgraded to prophet with Allah. Arabs together with their Muslim converts ignore the oath brit לשמה cut between the pieces and replace Ishmael as the son dedicated to inherit the chosen Cohen status oblivious to the concept of a chosen Cohen people!

         The blessing/curse opening first two commandments of Sinai serve as the basis to understand לא לשמה. Following the capture and destruction of Herod’s Temple the Romans “permitted” the establishment of a Sanhedrin in Tiberias! Akin to Napoleon’s “Sanhedrin” to give citizenship to Jews to serve as hamburger meat in his Armies! Both this and that Sanhedrin לא לשמה, simply because no Pesach/Yovel existed not in the entire history of the בית שני nor in the long g’lut which culminated in the Shoah! Therefore, the Shas Mishna compiled by rabbi Yechuda does not compile Sanhedrin common law rulings made in the past but rather serves as a model when Jews לשמה reconquer the oath brit homelands and establish the Torah as the Constitution of the Republic of Tribes which mandates a Federal common law Sanhedrin court system when Jews rule this land keeping the Yovel.

         Romulus Augustulus, the last Roman emperor, collapsed in 476CE at the helm of the Germanic barbarian Odoacer. The collapse of the Western Roman empire considered by many scholars as marking the beginning of the Dark Ages which witnessed the collapse of international travel and trade. Virtually all European governments sought to restore the Roman empire. The name Czar of Russia directly refers to Caesar. In the West the crowning of Charlemagne as Emperor of the Romans by Pope Leo III in 800 CE symbolized a revival of the idea of a unified Xtian empire in the West, harkening back to the legacy of Rome. The Holy Roman Empire, established in the early Middle Ages, this entity likewise sought לא לשמה to restore the dead Roman empire, much like the Romans sought to impose the dead Syrian Greek empire by renaming Judea unto Palestine. Then in 1939 the coward Chamberlain, after betraying the Czech Republic the year previous, did the same with the Balfour Resolution and promised to establish a Arab 75% majority Palestinian state within 10 years after WWII.

         Great Power 20th Century imperialism an extension of the dreams of Charlemagne and the Czar – both dead empires. Pre-’67 “neutral” England and France–Post ’67 wrote 242 in the Security Council (LBJ tied down in Vietnam), which stands on the British abomination of the ’39 White Paper which promised within 10 years after the War a 75% Arab majority Palestinian state. But both European empires as dead as Rome following the conclusive defeat of imperial ambitions of both London and Paris follow the 1956 War which terminated the great power status of both countries. The sun set on both empires. Yet the UN pretends that it establishes “international law” in the matter of a Palestinian State despite the cold hard fact that the UN Protectorate mandate of the League of Nations “Palestine” ceased to exist after David Ben Gurion declared – post the UN 181 validation by 2/3rds General Assembly validation of Jews equal rights to achieve self determination – the Jewish state of Israel. All UN attempts to re-impose the White Paper abomination, like UN 3379, 446 and 2334 null and void. The British empire dead like the Roman and Syrian Greek empires. The White Paper directly guilty for the Shoah. Any UN attempt to restore Roman “Palestine” dead.

         The phrase “מי שלמד תורה שלא לשמה, סופו ללמד לשמה” – often interpreted in idealistic terms, focusing on the educational aspect of Torah study. However the Baraita means nothing not under Par’o withholding straw and beating Israelites for their failure to meet their tale of brick production. Nor in all g’lut lands because מצרים לאו דוקא. Only in the oath sworn lands can Jews observe and keep mitzvot לשמה. In g’lut Jews do mitzvot לא לשמה so when they rule Canaan they do not forget how to do mitzvot לשמה. The model to do mitzvot לשמה learns from the generation of Yehoshua who conquered Canaan and established all 6 cities of refuge/small Sanhedrin courts; as opposed to the next generation לא לשמה who abandoned Torah justice (recorded in all prophetic mussar) and worshipped avoda zarah.

         “אנכי” ו“לא יהיה לך” – מפי הגבורה שמענום (Makkot 24a) Moshe’s entire covenantal warning in Devarim 27–30 is nothing but the expansion of these two commandments. “ראה נתתי לפניך היום את החיים ואת הטוב… ואת המוות ואת הרע.” (Devarim 30). The entire משנה תורה-דברים common law mandates צדק צדק תרדוף as the national application of the first two Sinai commandments. Moshe’s Torah establishes the oath brit as remembered through the Avot; a national, not psychological or personal religious observance which any Jew can do in g’lut.

         The mitzva of Moshiach dedicates לשמה the rule of צדק צדק תרדוף Sanhedrin common law courts. This wisdom time-oriented positive commandment must have this k’vanna of dedication. When the Moshe anointed the House of Aaron, herein defines the k’vanna of this wisdom time-oriented commandment. When the prophet Shmuel anointed both the house of Shaul and later David as Moshiach – herein defines the k’vanna of this wisdom time-oriented commandment לשמה. When Shaul failed to slaughter the king of Amalek and David failed to stand Uiah the Hittite before the Sanhedrin bar, both men profaned the dedication of Moshiach; Shaul lost the kingdom and David too lost the kingdom – initially through civil wars and later through Babylonian g’lut.

         מי שלמד תורה שלא לשמה = A nation that keeps Torah in g’lut—under Par’o, Rome, Charlemagne, the Czars, the British Empire, the UN—where mitzvot are practiced without sovereignty, without Yovel, without Sanhedrin, under the shadow of foreign gods and foreign law. Mitzvot in g’lut = שלא לשמה by definition—preservation, rehearsal, memory. All the centuries of Torah שלא לשמה in exile are not meaningless. Egypt serves as the model of t’shuva – remembering the oath sworn by each of the Avot to father the Cohen brit cut between the pieces/akadah\blessing to Yaacov. Therefore, the Mishnah simply not a record of an active Oral Torah Sanhedrin judicial system—but a blueprint for future sovereignty. The first “mitzvah” following reconquering ארץ ישראל the mitzva wherein all Israeli men accept the mitzva of Moshiach צדק צדק תרדוף as the dedication of the Yatzir Ha-Tov within our hearts for all generations as the yoke of the kingdom of heaven, the k’vanna of brit melah.

      9. 

         moshe kerr

         June 14, 2026 at 7:52 am

         The phrase “מי שלמד תורה שלא לשמה, סופו ללמד לשמה” a Baraita found in the Gemara of Avodah Zarah 19a. What does it mean? The Sinai Life/Death blessing\curse revolves around ruling the land with justice vs. Par’o like judicial oppression in g’lut as the k’vanna of the bi-polar דיוק separation between לשמה – לא לשמה. Rabbi Yechuda compiled his Shas Mishna in 210 CE, some 75 years after the collapse of the Bar Kachba revolt. By the time that Rabbi Yechuda published the Mishna – the name of Judea – Emperor Hadrian, around 135 CE, had already renamed that conquered province to Syria Palaestina.

         By the time of Rabbi’s Mishna the Romans had already decided to expunge the land of the Jewish people like as did the Syrian Greeks whom the Hanukka benching in ברכת המזון condemns for attempting to cause Israel to forget the Torah. G’lut, based upon מצרים – לאו דוקא, therein means תורה לא לשמה. The Syrian Greeks the first to change the name of Judea unto Palestine. This fact exceptionally important because universes separate לא לשמה g’lut oppression from Sanhedrin Court justice לשמה. Sanhedrin court fundamentally and absolutely require Yovel freedom, based upon Pesach freedom, and brit melah as the sign of this brit to rule the land with justice צדק צדק תרדוף first established at the brit cut between the pieces with HaShem & Avram לשמה.

         The generation of Yehoshua established the other 3 Cities of Refuge with their small Sanhedrin Capital Crimes courts. However, the next generation abandoned this Torah and worshipped avoda zara other Gods; meaning the Tribes of Israel abandoned the Federal Mishkan as Central hub of the Great Sanhedrin and cities of refuge as the spokes small Sanhedrin capital crime courts! Whenever Israel abandons the righteous pursuit of justice in the conquered land of Canaan, qualifies as av tuma avoda zara.

         לא לשמה “ulterior motives” stands under the 2nd Sinai commandment of g’lut. לשמה “sake of Heaven” – dedicates the Oral Torah tohor middot אל רחום וחנון etc לשמה; herein defines Yermia’s ברית חדש and rabbi Yechuda’s בכל לבבך chiddush in ברכות; Mishna א:א which lears kre’a shma as tefillah דאורייתא in ארץ ישראל; acceptance of the yoke of the Kingdom of Heaven לשמה – the k’vanna time-oriented wisdom commandment which prioritizes tohor middot as the dominant spirits which rule the heart over av tuma “Esav – middot” — Yatzir Ha-Rah spirits of violence hatred without cause “avoda zarah”.

         By the time rabbi Yechuda compiled his Shas Mishna and how much more so the Bavli Talmud sealed around 450CE, the land of Judea no longer called by that name but rather Palestine; the Roman religion of Xtianity had expunged the brit cut between the pieces and replaced it with a Harry Potter messiah “son of God”. Then the Arab caliphate slaughtered and butchered the Roman empire in the Middle East and replaced the JeZeus God downgraded to prophet with Allah. Arabs together with their Muslim converts ignore the oath brit לשמה cut between the pieces and replace Ishmael as the son dedicated to inherit the chosen Cohen status oblivious to the concept of a chosen Cohen people!

         The blessing/curse opening first two commandments of Sinai serve as the basis to understand לא לשמה. Following the capture and destruction of Herod’s Temple the Romans “permitted” the establishment of a Sanhedrin in Tiberias! Akin to Napoleon’s “Sanhedrin” to give citizenship to Jews to serve as hamburger meat in his Armies! Both this and that Sanhedrin לא לשמה, simply because no Pesach/Yovel existed not in the entire history of the בית שני nor in the long g’lut which culminated in the Shoah! Therefore, the Shas Mishna compiled by rabbi Yechuda does not compile Sanhedrin common law rulings made in the past but rather serves as a model when Jews לשמה reconquer the oath brit homelands and establish the Torah as the Constitution of the Republic of Tribes which mandates a Federal common law Sanhedrin court system when Jews rule this land keeping the Yovel.

         Romulus Augustulus, the last Roman emperor, collapsed in 476CE at the helm of the Germanic barbarian Odoacer. The collapse of the Western Roman empire considered by many scholars as marking the beginning of the Dark Ages which witnessed the collapse of international travel and trade. Virtually all European governments sought to restore the Roman empire. The name Czar of Russia directly refers to Caesar. In the West the crowning of Charlemagne as Emperor of the Romans by Pope Leo III in 800 CE symbolized a revival of the idea of a unified Xtian empire in the West, harkening back to the legacy of Rome. The Holy Roman Empire, established in the early Middle Ages, this entity likewise sought לא לשמה to restore the dead Roman empire, much like the Romans sought to impose the dead Syrian Greek empire by renaming Judea unto Palestine. Then in 1939 the coward Chamberlain, after betraying the Czech Republic the year previous, did the same with the Balfour Resolution and promised to establish a Arab 75% majority Palestinian state within 10 years after WWII.

         Great Power 20th Century imperialism an extension of the dreams of Charlemagne and the Czar – both dead empires. Pre-’67 “neutral” England and France–Post ’67 wrote 242 in the Security Council (LBJ tied down in Vietnam), which stands on the British abomination of the ’39 White Paper which promised within 10 years after the War a 75% Arab majority Palestinian state. But both European empires as dead as Rome following the conclusive defeat of imperial ambitions of both London and Paris follow the 1956 War which terminated the great power status of both countries. The sun set on both empires. Yet the UN pretends that it establishes “international law” in the matter of a Palestinian State despite the cold hard fact that the UN Protectorate mandate of the League of Nations “Palestine” ceased to exist after David Ben Gurion declared – post the UN 181 validation by 2/3rds General Assembly validation of Jews equal rights to achieve self determination – the Jewish state of Israel. All UN attempts to re-impose the White Paper abomination, like UN 3379, 446 and 2334 null and void. The British empire dead like the Roman and Syrian Greek empires. The White Paper directly guilty for the Shoah. Any UN attempt to restore Roman “Palestine” dead.

         The phrase “מי שלמד תורה שלא לשמה, סופו ללמד לשמה” – often interpreted in idealistic terms, focusing on the educational aspect of Torah study. However the Baraita means nothing not under Par’o withholding straw and beating Israelites for their failure to meet their tale of brick production. Nor in all g’lut lands because מצרים לאו דוקא. Only in the oath sworn lands can Jews observe and keep mitzvot לשמה. In g’lut Jews do mitzvot לא לשמה so when they rule Canaan they do not forget how to do mitzvot לשמה. The model to do mitzvot לשמה learns from the generation of Yehoshua who conquered Canaan and established all 6 cities of refuge/small Sanhedrin courts; as opposed to the next generation לא לשמה who abandoned Torah justice (recorded in all prophetic mussar) and worshipped avoda zarah.

         “אנכי” ו“לא יהיה לך” – מפי הגבורה שמענום (Makkot 24a) Moshe’s entire covenantal warning in Devarim 27–30 is nothing but the expansion of these two commandments. “ראה נתתי לפניך היום את החיים ואת הטוב… ואת המוות ואת הרע.” (Devarim 30). The entire משנה תורה-דברים common law mandates צדק צדק תרדוף as the national application of the first two Sinai commandments. Moshe’s Torah establishes the oath brit as remembered through the Avot; a national, not psychological or personal religious observance which any Jew can do in g’lut.

         The mitzva of Moshiach dedicates לשמה the rule of צדק צדק תרדוף Sanhedrin common law courts. This wisdom time-oriented positive commandment must have this k’vanna of dedication. When the Moshe anointed the House of Aaron, herein defines the k’vanna of this wisdom time-oriented commandment. When the prophet Shmuel anointed both the house of Shaul and later David as Moshiach – herein defines the k’vanna of this wisdom time-oriented commandment לשמה. When Shaul failed to slaughter the king of Amalek and David failed to stand Uiah the Hittite before the Sanhedrin bar, both men profaned the dedication of Moshiach; Shaul lost the kingdom and David too lost the kingdom – initially through civil wars and later through Babylonian g’lut.

         מי שלמד תורה שלא לשמה = A nation that keeps Torah in g’lut—under Par’o, Rome, Charlemagne, the Czars, the British Empire, the UN—where mitzvot are practiced without sovereignty, without Yovel, without Sanhedrin, under the shadow of foreign gods and foreign law. Mitzvot in g’lut = שלא לשמה by definition—preservation, rehearsal, memory. All the centuries of Torah שלא לשמה in exile are not meaningless. Egypt serves as the model of t’shuva – remembering the oath sworn by each of the Avot to father the Cohen brit cut between the pieces/akadah\blessing to Yaacov. Therefore, the Mishnah simply not a record of an active Oral Torah Sanhedrin judicial system—but a blueprint for future sovereignty. The first “mitzvah” following reconquering ארץ ישראל the mitzva wherein all Israeli men accept the mitzva of Moshiach צדק צדק תרדוף as the dedication of the Yatzir Ha-Tov within our hearts for all generations as the yoke of the kingdom of heaven, the k’vanna of brit melah.

      10. 

          paraleaglenm

          June 14, 2026 at 12:58 pm

          The Syrian Greeks the first to change the name of Judea unto Palestine.

          Actually, it was the Romans that renamed Judea into Philistia, but a Palestinian state never existed.
          This is historical record, and evidenced by the name struck into coins from about the time of 70AD.

          But Palestine was always a fiefdom of a greater nation or empire, never itself a nation-state. And its
          inhabitants were Jews and Christians, the UN census showing a 50:50 split between Arab Muslims and Jews, and some Christians,
          back in 1948. So, how can the Jews be ‘occupiers’ when all shared the region fairly equally and with no takeover of any formal
          state?

          The Temple was the storehouse of faith, the central theater of ritual and sacrifice, and the Holy of Holies. When Christ fulfilled
          his mission and the apostles went forth from the Jewish nation and spread the Word to all, including gentiles, the temple was destroyed
          in Israels last stand against Rome.

          As for the Christ being some sort of ‘Harry Potter’ character, that is demeaning. Yes, the Christ has been heavily borrowed from and made
          into fiction. But, do takes some time and read the actual ‘gospels’ and apply your same talent for history to them. The Christ was real, and
          the ‘final rabbi’ to the Jews.

          As for Mark and Peter, neither were recorded ever being in Rome. Paul was . . . Peter was ‘stolen’ from history to support Rome in its claim
          to being the center of Christendom, building the Basilica and Vatican, and declaring the Popes as pontiffs and head of the church. Well, that
          was a shame and the Dark Ages ensued, and Islam.

          Again, if you read the New Testament and see how it reaches back, repeatedly, to the Old Testament, and fulfills a New Covenant, your heart may
          be reached. I don’t proselytize as a rule, but won’t hold back from encouragement.

          In the end, the Muslim-Christian dilemma is what has a stranglehold on history as we speak. The Jews are holding their own in Israel, even though so
          many claim Israel isn’t real, nor are the Jews real Jews. It is a crazy world full of stupid people.

      11. 

          moshe kerr

          June 14, 2026 at 3:59 pm

          The Syrian Greeks attempt to turn Jerusalem into a Greek-like city state. Some other Xtian scholars argue that Mark written in Antioch Syria. But this pie in the sky nonsense usually confuse Mark with Peter. Papias argued that Mark was written in Rome. Mark’s gospel forgery does not engage in Torah common law any more than the other later books of the gospel forgeries. Hence speculation that Mark was written in Antioch Syria idol speculation with the emphasis on idol LOL

      12. 

          paraleaglenm

          June 14, 2026 at 5:12 pm

          It is speculated, written, that Mark accompanied Peter in a joint ministry, thus the overlapping of reportage.
          I am one of the small minority who firmly believes Peter was never in Rome.
          I think it is a bit harsh that witnesses to whom even gentile historians reported as a great man and teacher would
          forge or contrive ‘stories.’ Writing and writing materials were still only a stone’s throw from writing on stone or
          clay (yes, I can pun too) and writing as a skill an elevated station. It was taken very seriously, copyists laboring
          for perfection. There were no copy machines . . . letter by letter, making your own ink and pens.
          Antioch became a major Christian center.
          Of course, as Arabia fell to the Messianic Narcissist through plunder and lust, the rest of the nations fell because
          their national allegiance or even Christian faith was not strong enough to battle men who ‘Loved Death more than you love drinking wine.’

          Again, history is one thing. I think we can stipulate that the apostasy of Rome triggered the creation of Islam. That is clearly evident
          if you actually read the Koran. So, how do we stop Islam? We have a new large Islamic Center (in a state that loses population and closes churches,
          the Muslims are outgrowing their mosques!) zoned and planned up in a rural and high growth area North of the city, and many people have protested
          it and are trying to stop it. I cited the continuing genocide of Christians in Africa, and jihad murders/rapes in Europe making Islam unwelcome here
          in the U.S. In fact, there are laws against it, polygamy banned for immigrants but Muslims sneak it in using Sharia law and social services to fund
          the extended families, the courts defending the ‘children’ because they are ‘birthright citizens.’
          The law I am referencing is 8 USC 1424.

      13. 

          moshe kerr

          June 14, 2026 at 7:06 pm

          I do not know about speculation one way or the other. Mark simply not Peter just that simple. Neither your or my personal opinion one way or the other does not amount to squat.

      14. 

          paraleaglenm

          June 14, 2026 at 8:37 pm

          Well, Origin, Eusebius, and Tertullian all agree that Mark was not a witness per se, but transcribed what he was told by Peter.
          But he had other contemporaneous sources as well.

          Attacking the text is useless as there have been supporting fragments and parallel sources confirming Mark’s travels and contacts.

          However, have you read the Koran? Here, the scribes of Mohammad give an entirely fabricated history of Mary, Christ as a baby, that Ishmael was the
          true inheritor of Abraham, that Ishmael if not Adam himself helped build the Kabah, historically known as an Arabian house of idolatry.

          Again, the Koran is a set of verses supporting ten-years of plunder and rape as Mohammad raged across Arabia. His soldiers won battles because of their
          lust for blood and women, slaves . . . that is the entire scope of the Koran and why Muslims are basically ignorant and violent, greedy people.

          In contrast, the bible records 2000 years . . . and, again, all this is ‘squat’ unless there is a way to reason or combat the Muslim Movement which is,
          once again, wiping out Christians and Jews with impunity.

      15. 

          moshe kerr

          June 14, 2026 at 8:50 pm

          Pie in the sky. Harry Potter false messiah belief system both the latter and the former. The koran like the NT does not know how the T’NaCH defines prophet. LOL

      16. 

          paraleaglenm

          June 14, 2026 at 9:43 pm

          So, you haven’t read the Koran? As for the NT, they were Jews, Jesus well-learned for his age and confounded the rabbis and rulers.
          Take your Harry Potter line and sell it somewhere else. You must consider that Jesus was real, genuine, and still ‘sold’ more books than Potter
          by a factor of 10X, and more movies too.
          I’m done with your rudeness. Thanks for playing.

      17. 

          moshe kerr

          June 15, 2026 at 5:50 am

          I read an English translation. So since translations suck no I have not read much less studied the koran. You say they were Jews? What’s a Jew according to the Torah? You do not know because you’re stuck on your covenant word translation which flat out false.

      18. 

          paraleaglenm

          June 15, 2026 at 7:27 am

          Well, I appreciate the brevity. The translations are good enough to get the full gist. After all, the Koran doesn’t abuse poetic license. It is pretty direct.
          Who are Jews? The Muslims claim Ishmael was the true inheritor of God’s blessing through Abraham. That’s all I said.

          Kosher law of the Torah? Christ made a good point and later it was ‘revealed’ that gentiles were by no means under that covenant, to keep kosher. Christ said that
          whatever you eat with your mouth goes through digestion and ends up in the sewer. Instead, he asked all to consider what ‘comes out of your mouth,’ revealing your
          heart and mind, and is what makes you clean, or defiled.’

          Paul writes, “Owe nothing to anyone—except for your obligation to love one another. If you love your neighbor, you will fulfill the requirements of God’s law. For the commandments say, ‘You must not commit adultery. You must not murder. You must not steal . . . .’ These—and other such commandments—are summed up in this one commandment: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ Love does no wrong to others, so love fulfills the requirements of God’s law” (Romans 13:8–10, NLT).

          Jesus Himself said, “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another” (John 13:34; see also John 15:12; Matthew 19:19). In Matthew 22:37–40, Jesus summarized the Law and the Prophets with the two greatest commandments: love God with your entire being and love your neighbor as yourself. Jesus and Paul both prioritized love over law-keeping.

      19. 

          moshe kerr

          June 15, 2026 at 10:26 am

          Post Shoah the church in the sewer along with Arabs who support Hitler and preach kill the Jews. Your JeZeus said it best: “By their fruits you shall known them”.

      20. 

          paraleaglenm

          June 15, 2026 at 4:50 pm

          The Covenant of Moses has passed into the New. The temple is no more; the ultimate and final sacrifice fulfilling the promise and covering of sins.
          Who are the ‘Cohens’? Who is in the line of David? If a new temple is built in Jerusalem it will never be finished due to bickering and doubt. The Muslims built a
          mosque over the rock of Abraham and Isaac. They covet what they cannot have, so they war and destroy. The Jews, the way is still open and many, like me, found it.

      21. 

          moshe kerr

          June 15, 2026 at 5:09 pm

          Pie in the sky. ברית\brit does not correctly translate into covenant. A Torah “alliance” requires שם ומלכות and neither the NT nor the Koran, both mistranslate to the false word covenant! Neither this or that theological creed belief system knows what שם ומלכות refers to because all Goyim have never accepted the Torah at Sinai-Horev; Sinai the revelation of the Written Torah/Horev the revelation of the Oral Torah. Hence the reference שם ומלכות.

          Arabs built a mosque on Zion. So what that does not prove squat. Jews not a race or creed LOL

      22. 

          paraleaglenm

          June 16, 2026 at 8:32 am

          Bickering and anger gets us nowhere. Thought you might enjoy this panel of Christians, Jews, Psychologists, . . . an interesting discussion and uplifting words.
          https://www.facebook.com/reel/1881496832524650

      23. 

          moshe kerr

          June 16, 2026 at 8:46 am

          Have my own uplifting words:

          Israel currently rides an emotional rollercoaster ride. The war starting with the Oct 7th Abomination War/12 Day War\ fought to destroy Iran’s ability to make a nuclear bomb has exhausted the Israeli public. Regime change Trump never promoted as the main reason for the current Iran Hormuz war. The US blockade of Hormuz forced the Mullahs to negotiate. This in no way compares to Obozo’s multi-billion dollar bribes to the Mullahs. President Trump has a strong reputation among Israelis. From US recognition of Jerusalem to the dismantling of the UN 242 two state “White Paper” … Obozo’s 2334 – Zionism is Racism 3379. The dust has yet to settle in this 100 day + war. But, the Mullah fanatic regimes seems close to the Arab Spring which killed Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi. Chill. Judge the President in merit rather than guilt!

          DemonCRAP Trump Derangement Syndrome – puke. It compares to a parent forced to change the soiled diapers of a baby. It compares to a young boy or girl who cannot control their bladder at night and wet their beds! The U.S. under Trump did take a maximum‑pressure approach to Iran. The U.S. did not officially declare regime change as its policy. Obozo appeasement JCPOA treaty compares to Chamberlains betrayal of the Balfour Declaration with his White Paper which promised a Arab 75% majority Palestinian State in 10 years … UN Resolution 2334! Bottom Line: YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT THE BIG PICTURE.

          The presented opinion does not seek to win over deranged insane Demoncraps. It seeks to calm Israeli nerves and hightened suspicions. Israeli priorities: Jerusalem recognition, Golan recognition, Abraham Accords, UN 2334 pushback, Maximum pressure on Iran. President Trump prioritized in this war against Iran neutralizing Iran’s nuclear capability, not regime change. Ron Paul described the 1979 hostage crisis as “blow-back”. Trump’s maximum pressure crippled Iran’s economy, Eliminated Soleimani, amazingly strengthened US-Israel alliance alignment; emphatically rebuked the EU British failure in NATO. Signaled zero tolerance for an Iranian North Korea nuclear breakout.

          Israel struck Iranian nuclear/military sites (Natanz, etc.), assassinating leaders and damaging capabilities. Iran retaliated with hundreds of missiles/drones. The US joined with strikes on deeper sites like Fordow, then helped broker a June 24, 2025 ceasefire (Trump called it a “victory for everybody” and labeled the conflict the “12-Day War”). It was brief but “inconclusive” on long-term gains; Iran claims some sites survived.

          The war’s core centered upon destroying Iran’s nuclear breakout abilities and degrading its military/proxy network—specifically Lebanon—aligning with Israel’s and US security priorities. Trump authorized US involvement but publicly framed the goal as nuclear neutralization, not toppling the regime (echoing his earlier “no regime change” statements). This fits the “maximum pressure” pattern: sanctions crippled Iran’s economy, Soleimani was eliminated in 2020, and the strategy repeatedly signaled “zero tolerance” for a nuclear Iran (a North Korea-style threat).

          Iran’s 60% enriched uranium stockpile largely survived. The war exposed limits—Tehran’s retaliation caused civilian hits, and it didn’t end proxy wars or create the promised internal collapse. US imposed a naval blockade on Iranian ports (April 2026 onward) amid the ongoing war (which resumed after the 2025 ceasefire). Iran partially restricted Hormuz shipping (25% of global oil). Trump explicitly linked the pressure to forcing talks: the June 14, 2026 agreement ends fighting across fronts, reopens the Strait of Hormuz, lifts the blockade, and includes a framework for nuclear limits/inspections in exchange for sanctions relief (signing expected ~June 19). Ships are reportedly moving; Trump called it “let the oil flow” and a “great settlement.”

          The blockade created economic pain that compelled negotiations, much like maximum pressure’s intent. It echoed historical US leverage (e.g., past tanker issues) without full invasion. No official Trump policy document declared “regime change” as primary; focus remained nuclear/missile curbs.

      24. 

          paraleaglenm

          June 16, 2026 at 10:25 am

          Muammar Gaddafi seemed to have been doing great things for Libya, especially after Reagan shot that missile through his mansion window. Hillary had him assassinated . . .
          Obama didn’t bribe Iran–like Carter, he was supporting them.
          The Shi’ites have a prophecy to fulfill, and helping it along with a nuke suits them just fine.
          I think the ‘agreement’ is a transitional police action with the U.S. Navy lurking above Iran watching, gathering more intel.
          It will calm inflationary fears and help get the administration through the midterms which, if lost, means War Powers Act, impeachment, the DNC protecting Iran
          and helping them destroy Israel. And the DNC is using fraud to win elections, massive funding through fraud, fraud ‘baked into’ current election laws.
          Personally, I wouldn’t have taken the chance on a ‘deal,’ and just taken them out with ‘boots on the ground,’ but I guess something worse has to happen before
          the public will accept more loss of soldiers.
          So, it is all being punted for 2027. Iran should have been taken out, regime change, but unlike Muslims the Christians and liberal Jews have no stomach for
          fighting, to end it quickly. That decisive action would have guaranteed the midterms and the retaking of Southern Lebanon.
          I helped a Lebanese once, getting him off his green card and licensed. I heard a lot about what happened in Beirut and how there are still Lebanese Christians
          hiding in the mountains. He became very successful, a family and house . . . did better than I did, having to leave the salon and wife, after which she closed shop.
          Here in Albuquerque, there is a fight over a huge Islamic Center being built in a Catholic rural area and the controversy, like in Frisco, TX, is growing. The
          1st Amendment Right issue is the first hurdle. Calling out Islam as the criminal enterprise it is worldwide is the other.

      25. 

          moshe kerr

          June 16, 2026 at 12:13 pm

          Bitch Hillery had him assassinated and Libya remains in a state of Iraqi like anarchy to this day.

      26. 

          moshe kerr

          June 16, 2026 at 2:06 pm

          Comparing the 1939 White Paper to UN 446 passed by Carter whose book slandered Israel as Apartheid! UN 2334 voted with the aid of Obama. All three, explicit expressions of UN GA Resolution 3379 – Zionism is Racism; which the UN later annulled under President Bush – the bane of Saddam in Kuwait. “High Contracting Parties” post WWII legalese (legal language has been used as a political weapon) whereby UN official sought used the 4th Geneva Convention (1949) upon Israel as a badge of shame. The UN declares that Israelis do not have the right to rule territory originally declared by the League of Nations as “Palestine Mandate”, but “UN international law dictates” where and who live within the borders of Israel; a similar legalese first introduced by Chamberlain’s White Paper abomination.

          When Neville Chamberlain’s government issued the 1939 White Paper, they used the mask of British administrative law to effectively nullify the Mandate. By capping Jewish immigration and restricting land sales, they didn’t just break a promise—they used bureaucratic decrees to freeze Jews out of their own recognized national home right when they needed it most.

          The UN has essentially adopted this exact same tactic. By passing resolutions like 446 and 2334, the UN claims the authority to dictate who can live & where; treating Judea, Samaria, and East Jerusalem as “occupied” rather than recognizing the deep historical and legal continuity stemming from the original Mandate. The Fourth Geneva Convention, written in the immediate shadow of WWII to prevent brutal, aggressive regimes from depopulating countries, conducting forced deportations, and systematically destroying native populations (as the Nazis did across Europe). When UN bodies and international courts invoke the language of the “High Contracting Parties” against Israel, they steal a “convention” originally designed to prevent forced, aggressive population transfers and use it to sodomize Jews who choose to live, build homes, and buy land in their ancestral heartland – the UN and international courts now condemn Israeli guilt as equal to Nazi like war crime.

          When Jimmy Carter wrote Peace Not Apartheid, or when the Obama administration allowed Resolution 2334 to pass by withholding a U.S. veto, the tuma spirit of UN 3379 dominated their Yatzir Ha-Rah. They treated the Jewish state’s defensive positions and historical claims – not as a matter of survival or legitimate common law rights – but as an inherent Palestinian injustice that the international community has the ‘Divine-Right of Kings’ to micromanage. The UN behaves as a global parliament, rewriting its own rules to fit prevailing geopolitical voting block alignments; while treating Israel’s foundational legal rights under the Mandate as if they can be erased comparable to how post Bar Kochba Rome erased Judea.

          Resolutions 446 and 2334 ignores the core principle of legal continuity (found in Article 80 of the UN Charter, often called the “Jewish People’s Clause,” which preserved all rights granted under the League of Nations Mandates) and instead attempts to legislate Jews out of their heartland by bureaucratic fiat. By treating the Jewish presence in Shiloh, Hebron, or Jerusalem as a “flagrant violation” akin to the darkest crimes of the 20th century, international bodies strip the convention of its moral anchor, transforming a tool of human rights into a political badge of shame.

      27. 

          paraleaglenm

          June 16, 2026 at 7:15 pm

          That’s analyst analysis there. ‘Apartheid,’ my ass. Most people don’t even know the definition, which is ‘stateless,’ and the South Africans were justified in denying entry or immigration to the masses of tribal blacks pouring down from the North because they had no approval for crossing the border, except limited work permits.
          Israel, upon it full incorporation into a nation in 1948, was not a nation at all and Jew and Arab Muslims split the population fairly evenly . . . so, who was occupying whom? Neither, except for when Mohammad’s forced Jerusalem to surrender.
          I voted for Carter because I thought he was smart, but bringing the Ayatollah back from exile in France was the dumbest move ever. After that, I stopped voting period for making such a mistake myself.

          So, we finally agree on some things:

          Again, this roundtable discussing the Sabbath featuring Jordan Peterson and featuring Dennis Pragar is a refreshing lecture.
          https://www.facebook.com/reel/1881496832524650

      28. 

          moshe kerr

          June 17, 2026 at 5:15 am

          The genesis scream-out by the UN voting blocks which post 1967 ad infinitum repeatedly bemoan Israel’s gross violation of “international law” and illegally occupy Palestinian lands & territories – began with the British 1939 White Paper. The White Paper betrayed the terms and obligations which London agreed to accept the League established Protectorate of Palestine to establish a Jewish National Home in Palestine.

      29. 

          moshe kerr

          June 17, 2026 at 5:16 am

          As an secular Israeli I do not, as a rule, listen to religious fanatic g’lut Jews. Pragar, I heard what he had to say when I lived in the US prior to making aliya in 1991.

      30. 

          moshe kerr

          June 17, 2026 at 8:31 am

          How do you catch a fish? Put a worm on a hook. Political & Religious propaganda slander works on the exact same principle.

          The Foundation of the UN predominant Xtian & Muslim voting block nations – propaganda efforts to recognize a Palestinian State – an utter fraud. The genesis scream-out by the UN voting blocks, the EU or African non-aligned nations for example, which post 1967 ad infinitum repeatedly bemoan Israel’s gross violation of “international law” and illegally occupy Palestinian lands & territories – began with the British 1939 Chamberlain White Paper whose Arab appeasement policy followed the betrayal of the Czech Republic.

          The White Paper sodomized the terms and obligations which London originally agreed to accept, terms imposed by League of Nations. That contract, whose terms London accepted openly embrace the 1917 Balfour Declaration. The Balfour Declaration defines Herzl’s Political Zionism; which established the Mandate-Protectorate of Palestine – to restore a Jewish National Home\self-determination.

          London imperialism, based upon its paidika boy favorite imperialism, sought to permanently rule the League Palestine Mandate as a colony. The 1936-39 Arab revolt forced the coward Chamberlain to adjust British Middle East policy. Post WWII, for example, London attempted to seize the Suez Canal from Nasser’s Egypt; based upon the classic British imperialism to dominate the balance of power in any given region of the world.

          London imposed a opium trade monopoly and initiated the Century of Shame upon China. Secretary of State under Lincoln defeated this standard over-used “card” of London. William H. Seward sent two opposing diplomatic notes to PM Palmerston and Foreign Secretary Lord Russel. Based upon the known fact that the two men hated and despised one another. The Yankee blockade of Confederate ports presented a real problem for London.

          The genesis of the Industrial Revolution started in Britain late in the 18th century – prior to the Napoleonic wars. Technological development in textile industry mechanization & manufacturing (spinning jenny, water frame, power loom), steam power, iron production, and factory organization caused England to abandon an agricultural based economy; Britain the first country to make slavery illegal, which agricultural based economies like Confederate America absolutely required.

          Lancashire’s textile districts, despite the invention by Eli Whitney in the United States (1793) of the cotton gin – which made even short-staple cotton feasible – still heavily dependent on Confederate cotton in 1861–63 (the “Cotton Famine” caused severe unemployment and political pressure). Substitutes (Egypt, India) existed but could not immediately match volume, quality, or supply logistics fast enough to calm British industry.

          The Seward stratagem, he dispatched diplomatic notes to Palmerston informing London that Washington would permit Britain to acquire Southern cotton through Mexico. Yet another opposing note sent to Foreign Minister Lord Russel declared: any British attempt to break the Union blockade of Confederate ports through Mexico, Washington would consider as an actus belli\\act of War.

          The consequences of this stratagem: it shamed PM Palmerston, not only when Russel waved his diplomatic note before Parliament, but contributed to the failure of the Palmerston government to intervene in Bismarck’s 3 little wars which unified imperial Germany and radically changed the balance of power in Europe! Likewise the 1956 War permanently negated the great power status of both London and Paris in the Middle East.

          Voting blocks shape UN political decisions. For example GA 3379 or UN SC Resolutions 446 and 2334, all contributed to forge the basis by which the UN GA later recognized an Arab Palestinian state; Palestine received upgraded UN status in 2012 (GA resolution 67/19) as a non‑member observer state. Which many states propaganda offices treat as de‑facto recognition of statehood. Despite the cold hard fact: never an independent Arab Palestinian state ever historically existed. The British White Paper corrupt foundation declared just prior to the outbreak of WWII, the British intent to establish an Arab 2/3rd majority Palestinian state within 10 years after WWII.

          UNSC condemnations of Israeli illegal occupation through settler settlements simply do not in and of themselves “create” statehood. But rather demonize Israel and project propaganda which tremendously increased pressure on Israel to surrender to the will of the UN.

          UN Security Council condemnations (e.g., Res. 446, Res. 2334) and General Assembly actions (e.g., GA 67/19) exist only as political instruments of propaganda. Chapter VI condemnations have no enforcement teeth. Chapter VI therefore compares to GA condemnations and\or declarations. Only Korean War Chapter VII ultimatums, empower UN military enforcement. Hence Res. 446, & 2334 exist on par with GA propaganda declarations, and serve as the continuation of British White Paper Jewish Shoah guilt which witnessed the obliteration of 75% of Western European Jewry in less than three years!

      31. 

          paraleaglenm

          June 17, 2026 at 12:04 pm

          So, you live in Israel now? Since 1991?

          You decry your own people, anyone not being as orthodox as yourself? Again, the discussion of Shabbat in the New Testament/Gospels is well done and will give you an understanding, wisdom, of what Christianity brought to Israel, to Jerusalem, to Zion.
          This is a possible cure for your cynicism and a path to wisdom.

          Another interesting aspect is taking the dream interpretations of Daniel, and how the angel giving Revelation to the Apostle John returned to Daniel’s understanding of the passing through times of the gentile nations and empires rising and falling, and fills in missing information Daniel could not possess at the time.

          The United States and Britain are in trouble. The bible predicted the ‘foreign princes’ being the ‘iron mixed with clay’ undermining the very foundation and stability of our current civilization. Illegal aliens, especially the gut blow Biden delivered to us in 2020-2024 may have been a death blow, and Israel miraculously survives when half of its population are the enemy within, with ties to surrounding Arab nations.

          Texas has finally deported a Hamas supporter, revoking his visa. Under INA immigration law, Muslims should not even be issued a visa, let alone be allowed to immigrate. I have written extensively on Birthright Citizenship, a ‘dual citizenship’ in which neither the father or child ‘naturalized’ via required ‘renunciation and oath of allegiance,’ unnaturally possessing two national identities in conflict of law.
          Here in New Mexico, we are fighting the building of a garish white 50,000 sq ft mosque on 3 acres of rural land on the outskirts of town. Some protests involve ‘zoning’ issues, traffic; while others just pray . . . while the education of the people of how intractable and insidious and enemy Islam is is being broadcast, explained.

          One of the books I read on Islam before 9-11 was ‘The Mantel of the Prophet,’ a book about the full political and religious history of Iran. It explained, back then, what Iran’s mullahs were up to. Also, a history of Jerusalem by Simon Sebag Montefiore’s history of Jerusalem, which is heart-rendering and a blow, to see history, cruelty, yet hope.

      32. 

          moshe kerr

          June 17, 2026 at 2:48 pm

          Am not religious. To state this racially: the nigger religious Jews live on the other side of the tracks. LOL

          Sorry NT Greek lacks the nuance to discern the difference between two critical Hebrew verbs מלאכה vs. עבודה. Hence the JeZeus in the Gospel forgery did not know how to observe shabbat as a wisdom time-oriented commandment.

          Am not a scholar of T’NaCH mysticism ie the Book of Daniel. The NT puke fails to discern the difference between mystics from prophets. LOL The Hebrew T’NaCH places the Book of Daniel in the Writings portion and not in the Prophets portion of the NaCH. The Gemara of Magillah openly states “Daniel not a prophet”. Wisdom which cannot discern the basics from the basics = no wisdom at all.

          Hate the British. The British 1939 White Paper sealed the fate of Western European Jewry. Not involved in American politics since I made aliya back in 1991. Even when living in America never voted in US elections cause I understood Israel was my home. Finished high school at NMMI Roswell NM in 1979.

          I do not know for sure but perhaps the Mullahs will not survive the Trump beat down they have suffered.

      33. 

          paraleaglenm

          June 17, 2026 at 7:17 pm

          Roswell, NM. 1979. I graduated in 1972.
          Your anger and cynicism, orthodoxy, really grinds me the wrong way. Sorry you didn’t like the Shabbat roundtable or the Book of Daniel.

          As for the Shi’ites in Iran, deadly and dangerous, deserving of extinction. I mean, what does 3000 missiles and the billions in defense it cost Israel
          justify but complete obliteration? As I said, I personally knew people who had to flee Lebanon and am a big fan of Bridgette Gabriel.

          I had a pen pal in Tehran . . . that’s what got me started studying Islam. Then 9-11 hit.
          I was the key legal researcher fighting Obama’s presidency, the matter of natural born citizenship and now birthright citizenship.

          Listening to you, to others, my own struggle to rise above the dissonance and find the truth, I can only fall back on one bible verse,
          ‘Let God be True and Every Man a Liar.’ Romans 3:4 from what you call the fake bible.

      34. 

          moshe kerr

          June 18, 2026 at 5:25 am

          Post Shoah Israelis, especially after the Eichmann trial, simply not interested in genocide anyone. Israeli strategic foreign policy centers upon forging alliances with all states in the Middle East and North Africa.

          Gabriel a displaced Xtian from Lebanon. Other than that I know nothing about her politics other than she apparently has a strong dislike for Shiite Muslims. In America that’s fine. But exceptionally dangerous in Lebanon consequent to the shared balance of power between Xtians and Muslim populations.

          Am not aware of NT theology, as an Israeli it has zero influence among my people. Fake bible = CNN Fake Noise News.

      35. 

          moshe kerr

          June 18, 2026 at 5:33 am

          My daughter born some 6 months prior to 9/11. My wife diagnosed with thyroid cancer and had to undergo radiation treatments. Funny thing about 9/11 Cheney lead his Bush on a leash to invade Iraq but Saddam not involved in the attack. Bush II promised no nation building but then his Administration did just that. I lived near Tel Aviv when Bush I kicked Saddam out of Kuwaite. Israel had to absorb Scud missiles because to join the coalition would cause the Arab states like Saudi Arabia and Egypt to leave the grand coalition. The only Israeli killed a pig rancher.

          When I lived in America I loved pork. Truly miss it now that I live in Israel.

      36. 

          paraleaglenm

          June 18, 2026 at 7:07 am

          Many questioned, Why Iraq? An Iraqi general said there were fissile materials, bomb research, put on an empty passenger jet and flown out to, forget where.
          Also, Al-Qaeda training grounds. Fine. But if you look at a map, Iraq was right in the center of the growing caliphate, and attacking Iraq also had UN approval
          via violations of no-fly zones.

          The NT was written by Jews. An interesting text is Galatians 1:8, that many related to sects or cults. Both Smith of the Mormons and Mohammad claimed to have
          received their enlightenment from an angel. Again, how can Islam follow a ‘war text’ and obvious fabrications only covering ten years of mayhem, murder, as perfect revelation? Answer: They
          were horrible men seeking gold, seeking power, stealing women. Their lusts were fed by fire and blood. Hardly a noble or spiritual religion!

          “But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let them be under God’s curse!”

      37. 

          moshe kerr

          June 18, 2026 at 7:42 am

          No physical evidence presented that Saddam had what Trump saw as a nuclear threat. You say the NT written by Jews? prove it.

          If the NT fraud reduced to a single verse, how does that verse define the soul of the church to make ‘blood libel’ accusations that did not end with the shoah but continue with the Oct7th massacre on the last day of Chag Sukkot and UN ICJ and ICC blood libel slanders?

          No evidence forgiveness works or is granted by belief. Promising forgiveness through belief alone undermines moral responsibility. Repentance has no connection with t’shuva. T’shuva directly affixed to the consequences of the Av tuma avoda zarah Golden Calf worshipped by the ערב רב שאין להם יראת שמים; Moshe forced HaShem to “remember” the oaths sworn to the Avot. Consequently on Yom Kippur HaShem made t’shuva and annulled the vow to make Moshe the father of the chosen Cohen people.

          Mesechta Yoma rabbi Meir vs the sages who bring NaCH sources against the ודוי made by Moshe Rabbeinu in the Torah! How did the NaCH and even more so the majority of Tannaim sages rule against Moshe’s ודוי and the halacha follow their opinion? Answer – in all rabbinic matters the majority decides the halacha. Therefore the language of Moshe’s ודוי in the Torah – a rabbinic ודוי no different from the majority opinion of a different order of how to make a ודוי דרבנן. What then defines a ודוי דאורייתא? The dedication (מלכות) of Oral Torah middot (pronoun) רוח הקודש spirits within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart. Hence the sages teach that tefillah ‘a matter of the heart’. The Oral Torah which Moshe heard on Yom Kippur defines the tohor middot: as ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון etc.

          Xtian repentance in no wise remotely compares to t’shuva as defined by the Torah. Forgiveness, simply a pie in the sky feel good word substitute. No different than JeZeus is God or covenant means brit. ‘Believes in him’ and ‘forgiveness’ totally undefined terms of Xtian religious rhetoric. The definition of avoda zara perhaps best defined through theological belief systems. Torah defines faith as צדק צדק תרדוף. Justice requires objectivity. Belief – by definition subjective; it centers all around the Ego-I. Torah common law justice fundamentally NOT a belief system. Common law stands upon prior judicial courtroom precedents; not theological creed belief decrees like the Nicene Council. Acts 10:43 simply noise from the lower parts of the anatomy.

          No evidence forgiveness works or is granted by belief. Promising forgiveness through belief alone undermines moral responsibility. Repentance has no connection with t’shuva. T’shuva directly affixed to the consequences of the Av tuma avoda zarah Golden Calf worshipped by the ערב רב שאין להם יראת שמים; Moshe forced HaShem to “remember” the oaths sworn to the Avot. Consequently on Yom Kippur HaShem made t’shuva and annulled the vow to make Moshe the father of the chosen Cohen people.

          Mesechta Yoma rabbi Meir vs the sages who bring NaCH sources against the ודוי made by Moshe Rabbeinu in the Torah! How did the NaCH and even more so the majority of Tannaim sages rule against Moshe’s ודוי and the halacha follow their opinion? Answer – in all rabbinic matters the majority decides the halacha. Therefore the language of Moshe’s ודוי in the Torah – a rabbinic ודוי no different from the majority opinion of a different order of how to make a ודוי דרבנן. What then defines a ודוי דאורייתא? The dedication (מלכות) of Oral Torah middot (pronoun) רוח הקודש spirits within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart. Hence the sages teach that tefillah ‘a matter of the heart’. The Oral Torah which Moshe heard on Yom Kippur defines the tohor middot: as ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון etc.

          Xtian repentance in no wise remotely compares to t’shuva as defined by the Torah. Forgiveness, simply a pie in the sky feel good word substitute. No different than JeZeus is God or covenant means brit. ‘Believes in him’ and ‘forgiveness’ totally undefined terms of Xtian religious rhetoric. The definition of avoda zara perhaps best defined through theological belief systems. Torah defines faith as צדק צדק תרדוף. Justice requires objectivity. Belief – by definition subjective; it centers all around the Ego-I. Torah common law justice fundamentally NOT a belief system. Common law stands upon prior judicial courtroom precedents; not theological creed belief decrees like the Nicene Council. Acts 10:43 simply noise from the lower parts of the anatomy; if “all the prophets” really point to Jesus, then those who don’t accept that reading—Jews—can be cast as obstinate, blind, or guilty Christ-killers who bear the eternal mark of Cain. Acts 10:43 as the theological DNA that allows the church (and later, the mosque in its own way) to redefine Israel’s story, claim its prophets, and then accuse Israel of monstrous crimes when Jews refuse that redefinition.

          Acts 10:43 defines the soul of the church, based upon how the Torah defines soul. The precedent – brit cut between the pieces wherein an oath alliance sworn between partners wherein the Torah defines the “soul of Avram” through all his future born chosen Cohen seed who eternally inherit the lands of Canaan. Soul does not refer to present tense because Avram at the time of that oath alliance brit – childless. Therefore it seems to me that Acts 10:43 defines the soul of the church and mosque abominations of av tuma avoda zarah because blood libels\לשון הרע define the behavior of the church in all generations.

          This narrative involving Peter and Cornelius does not invoke the Avot in general or Avraham in particular. Its tumah soteriology theology, [“All the prophets testify about him” claims that the entire Tanakh in point of fact really all about Jesus. That’s a classic supersessionist move: Israel’s story is reinterpreted as prelude to the church.], completely and totally alien to the NaCH prophets. Hence its declaration utterly false on par with Muhammad another false prophet. Both abominations promote anti‑Jewish supersessionist theologies.

          The Torah directly condemns false prophets, the gospel JeZeus converted by the Nicene Council into a God and unto a prophet by the Koran – both false books fail to define Prophet from the Torah. Neither Esav nor Yismael accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Both employ “covenant” when that foreign term distorts brit as an oath alliance which requires שם ומלכות. The 1st commandment Sinai Name never once recognized not in the NT nor in the Koran. מלכות the code word for Oral Torah middot – which the church fathers throughout their history have publicly denied. Hence the confusion between t’shuva and repentance.

          If brit is gutted, then t’shuva is gutted, and justice becomes secondary to belief. From there, it’s not a big leap to supersessionism: Esav and Yishmael claim the language of covenant while rejecting the actual revelation at Sinai and the Oral Torah that defines מלכות. Torah’s insistence on צדק צדק תרדוף and on t’shuva bound to brit – a direct challenge to any system that promises cheap grace while enabling deep injustice from generation to generation to generation.

      38. 

          moshe kerr

          June 18, 2026 at 11:14 am

          Made a re-write:

          If the NT fraud reduced to a single verse, how does that verse define the soul of the church to make ‘blood libel’ accusations that did not end with the shoah but continue with the Oct7th massacre on the last day of Chag Sukkot and UN ICJ and ICC blood libel slanders?

          No evidence forgiveness works or is granted by belief. Promising forgiveness through belief alone undermines moral responsibility. Repentance has no connection with t’shuva. T’shuva directly affixed to the consequences of the Av tuma avoda zarah Golden Calf worshipped by the ערב רב שאין להם יראת שמים; Moshe forced HaShem to “remember” the oaths sworn to the Avot. Consequently on Yom Kippur HaShem made t’shuva and annulled the vow to make Moshe the father of the chosen Cohen people.

          Mesechta Yoma rabbi Meir vs the sages who bring NaCH sources against the ודוי made by Moshe Rabbeinu in the Torah! How did the NaCH and even more so the majority of Tannaim sages rule against Moshe’s ודוי and the halacha follow their opinion? Answer – in all rabbinic matters the majority decides the halacha. Therefore the language of Moshe’s ודוי in the Torah – a rabbinic ודוי no different from the majority opinion of a different order of how to make a ודוי דרבנן. What then defines a ודוי דאורייתא? The dedication (מלכות) of Oral Torah middot (pronoun) רוח הקודש spirits within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart. Hence the sages teach that tefillah ‘a matter of the heart’. The Oral Torah which Moshe heard on Yom Kippur defines the tohor middot: as ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון etc.

          Xtian repentance in no wise remotely compares to t’shuva as defined by the Torah. Forgiveness, simply a pie in the sky feel good word substitute. No different than JeZeus is God or covenant means brit. ‘Believes in him’ and ‘forgiveness’ totally undefined terms of Xtian religious rhetoric. The definition of avoda zara perhaps best defined through theological belief systems. Torah defines faith as צדק צדק תרדוף. Justice requires objectivity. Belief – by definition subjective; it centers all around the Ego-I. Torah common law justice fundamentally NOT a belief system. Common law stands upon prior judicial courtroom precedents; not theological creed belief decrees like the Nicene Council. Acts 10:43 simply noise from the lower parts of the anatomy.

          No evidence forgiveness works or is granted by belief. Promising forgiveness through belief alone undermines moral responsibility. Repentance has no connection with t’shuva. T’shuva directly affixed to the consequences of the Av tuma avoda zarah Golden Calf worshipped by the ערב רב שאין להם יראת שמים; Moshe forced HaShem to “remember” the oaths sworn to the Avot. Consequently on Yom Kippur HaShem made t’shuva and annulled the vow to make Moshe the father of the chosen Cohen people.

          Mesechta Yoma rabbi Meir vs the sages who bring NaCH sources against the ודוי made by Moshe Rabbeinu in the Torah! How did the NaCH and even more so the majority of Tannaim sages rule against Moshe’s ודוי and the halacha follow their opinion? Answer – in all rabbinic matters the majority decides the halacha. Therefore the language of Moshe’s ודוי in the Torah – a rabbinic ודוי no different from the majority opinion of a different order of how to make a ודוי דרבנן. What then defines a ודוי דאורייתא? The dedication (מלכות) of Oral Torah middot (pronoun) רוח הקודש spirits within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart. Hence the sages teach that tefillah ‘a matter of the heart’. The Oral Torah which Moshe heard on Yom Kippur defines the tohor middot: as ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון etc.

          Xtian repentance in no wise remotely compares to t’shuva as defined by the Torah. Forgiveness, simply a pie in the sky feel good word substitute. No different than JeZeus is God or covenant means brit. ‘Believes in him’ and ‘forgiveness’ totally undefined terms of Xtian religious rhetoric. The definition of avoda zara perhaps best defined through theological belief systems. Torah defines faith as צדק צדק תרדוף. Justice requires objectivity. Belief – by definition subjective; it centers all around the Ego-I. Torah common law justice fundamentally NOT a belief system. Common law stands upon prior judicial courtroom precedents; not theological creed belief decrees like the Nicene Council. Acts 10:43 simply noise from the lower parts of the anatomy; if “all the prophets” really point to Jesus, then those who don’t accept that reading—Jews—can be cast as obstinate, blind, or guilty Christ-killers who bear the eternal mark of Cain. Acts 10:43 as the theological DNA that allows the church (and later, the mosque in its own way) to redefine Israel’s story, claim its prophets, and then accuse Israel of monstrous crimes when Jews refuse that redefinition.

          Acts 10:43 defines the soul of the church, based upon how the Torah defines soul. The precedent – brit cut between the pieces wherein an oath alliance sworn between partners wherein the Torah defines the “soul of Avram” through all his future born chosen Cohen seed who eternally inherit the lands of Canaan. Soul does not refer to present tense because Avram at the time of that oath alliance brit – childless. Therefore it seems to me that Acts 10:43 defines the soul of the church and mosque abominations of av tuma avoda zarah because blood libels\לשון הרע define the behavior of the church in all generations.

          This narrative involving Peter and Cornelius does not invoke the Avot in general or Avraham in particular. Its tumah soteriology theology, [“All the prophets testify about him” claims that the entire Tanakh in point of fact really all about Jesus. That’s a classic supersessionist move: Israel’s story is reinterpreted as prelude to the church.], completely and totally alien to the NaCH prophets. Hence its declaration utterly false on par with Muhammad another false prophet. Both abominations promote anti‑Jewish supersessionist theologies.

          The Torah directly condemns false prophets, the gospel JeZeus converted by the Nicene Council into a God and unto a prophet by the Koran – both false books fail to define Prophet from the Torah. Neither Esav nor Yismael accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Both employ “covenant” when that foreign term distorts brit as an oath alliance which requires שם ומלכות. The 1st commandment Sinai Name never once recognized not in the NT nor in the Koran. מלכות the code word for Oral Torah middot – which the church fathers throughout their history have publicly denied. Hence the confusion between t’shuva and repentance.

          If brit is gutted, then t’shuva is gutted, and justice becomes secondary to belief. From there, it’s not a big leap to supersessionism: Esav and Yishmael claim the language of covenant while rejecting the actual revelation at Sinai and the Oral Torah that defines מלכות. Torah’s insistence on צדק צדק תרדוף and on t’shuva bound to brit – a direct challenge to any system that promises cheap grace while enabling deep injustice from generation to generation to generation.

          The effectiveness of UN peacekeeping missions in the Middle East, specifically contrasting UNIFIL’s performance in Lebanon with the earlier UNEF mission in Sinai and its perceived similarities to UNRWA. UNIFIL, like the 1956 UNEF force, lacks the teeth to remain when a host nation or powerful actor demands its departure—touches on the fundamental limitations of UN mandates. UN Secretary-General at the time, U Thant, immediately withdrew UNEF I as if Abdel Nasser determined its mandate, and directly contributed to the outbreak of the June ’67 War; no different from the ’39 White Paper directly contributed to the Nazi Shoah.

          UNIFIL’s Mandate and Limitations shares this vulnerability but operates under a different, yet equally constrained, mandate. UNIFIL has historically avoided direct confrontation with Hezbollah. UNIFIL has effectively allowed Hezbollah to build up its arsenal right under its nose, similar to how UNEF was seen as powerless to stop Egyptian rearmament or military movements before 1967. The comparison to UNRWA often made in political discourse because both are criticized for operating in areas where they are accused of enabling non-state armed groups (Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza).

          That the UN through UNRWA allowed Hamas to operate within its facilities and has failed to prevent the group’s rise in Gaza, effectively becoming a substitute for governance that allows Hamas to focus on military buildup. UNIFIL likewise duplicated the disgrace of UNWRA in Gaza. Both allowed Hezbollah and Hamas to operate within its patrolled domains right under their noses. Hence the analogy to the 1956 Sinai withdrawal apt and relevant like comparing church blood libels to Oct7th UN blood libels of genocide!

      39. 

          paraleaglenm

          June 18, 2026 at 1:36 pm

          The ‘evidence’ was removed. There is a book written about it.
          But the US was able to attack Iraq under its UN violations and, as I’ve noted, Iraq was the center of the Caliphate growing
          amongst the Islamic states and the U.S. attack divided them, as in ‘divide and conquer.’

          Iran entered the Iraq war and the U.S. did have a few allies amongst the Muslims, being Kuwait and Bahrain.

          Perhaps the right action would have been investigating all the U.S. mosques and closing them down, deporting all Muslims. After
          all, the 9-11 attack was organized in the U.S., through mosques and imams.

          But while we agree that wiping out the IGRC regime is the only answer, who will the Iranian ‘People’ support? They are diverse and
          not unified. But anything is better than the Shi’ite ‘Masters of the Universe.’ Their cruelty is denounced to this day by Iranian
          expats.

          Are you saying that Christians had something to do with the Holocaust? True, France and Spain forced all Jews out, dispossessing them.
          But Nicaea II decided that Jews who accepted the Christ of Bethlehem but continued practicing Judaism were heretics!
          I, sir, was in a crisis for a few years back in the mid-seventies and could not finish college. I could have gone to medical school, . . .
          but I started studying all religions of the world (except Islam) in ‘search for God.’ I returned to the Old Testament and after that continued
          on with the New Testament and the continuity hit me, the fulfillment of the scriptures and God’s People in that one man, witnessed . . . and at
          age 27 I was literally brought down to my knees. I became a Christian then, but never baptized.

          To this day, my independent studies put me at odds with most churches. I was actually kicked out of one! I was in a tribunal of sorts, but I won
          in the end and was readmitted, but I moved to New Mexico and things happening here caused me to ‘fall away’ and never return to the church.

          I started studying law and writing. But that got me into trouble. My essay/memorandum on Same Sex Marriage in 2005 caused the school administration to
          attack me, slash my grades, scream at me in front of the class. One class from two degrees I quit, walked out. In brief, my essay concluded that legalizing
          same sex marriage was void ab initio, an imperfect contract, and would eventually make the bible ‘hate speech’ and be a danger to our children, and protection
          of children is a legitimate state interest cancelling out any claims of ‘equal protection’ for LGBT.

          Well, my 2005 essay proved true. Preaching certain anti-homosexual scripture from the bible has become illegal, a crime, in some countries, people being imprisoned
          in England and now Canada. The blatant attack, culturally and sexually, upon children (the prime target of the LGBT agenda) is starting to get people more active in
          rejecting our foolish, feckless U.S. Supreme Court.

          But the enemy at the gate right now is Islam, and the Koran was written by horrible people describing the false religion of a madman, a narcissistic ‘messianic’ prophet
          who claimed an angel directed him in his pursuit of evil, to kill Jews and Christians. It is not a ‘blood debt’ killing Jews, but ‘blood lust’ and hatred of God that is
          killing Jews and Christians.

          The people are cut off from God. Even the Jews are broken and cannot agree. We have the ‘self hating Jews’ supporting gays and Hamas . . . hating Israel . . . so many anti-Jewish
          screeds, even saying the Jews who came to Israel after WWII were not real Jews. And my family (except for my sister and parents) in New Mexico and Texas are all Jewish and reject
          me.

          Life is short. The only answer is to seek God personally, and hold that path. That roundtable link about Jesus being attacked about the Sabbath by the Jewish rabbis was a cordial and
          uplifting discussion, and the quotes from the NT (what you call a fake bible) bring the subject to life.

          Right now, my attention is turned to a 50,000 sq ft mosque being proposed to be built just North of Albuquerque, before Bernalillo. How many Americans have actually read the Koran or
          its history? They don’t . . . they are too involved in school, work, materialism, their families. Islam came out of evil, and the men Mohammad attracted to fulfill his conquest of
          Arabia were the scum of the earth, and those who adhere to Islam as their ‘faith’ today are lowlifes, evil . . . scum of the earth. Those ‘good’ Muslims out there, well, they are just
          trapped in the social milieu their existence relies on. They cannot break free.

      40. 

          moshe kerr

          June 18, 2026 at 6:14 pm

          Iraq invaded Iran LOL. Syria sided with Iran in that war.

      41. 

          moshe kerr

          June 18, 2026 at 6:16 pm

          Most definitely. The Nazi book burnings Catholic and burning Jews in their Shuls Martin Luther advised. The Ghetto gulags imposed across Europe for 3 Centuries etc etc etc.

      42. 

          moshe kerr

          June 18, 2026 at 6:18 pm

          T’NaCH not remotely similar to the Xtian Old Testament. LOL

      43. 

          moshe kerr

          June 19, 2026 at 6:30 am

          Restoring Legislative Review

          King Shlomo the Civil War curse the prophet Natan placed upon David for his failure to trial the capital crimes case of Uria before a Sanhedrin court! King David once he had defeated all foreign kings from off the land he should have immediately established from the Torah the mitzva of Yovel and immediately thereafter restored the Cities of Refuges with their small Sanhedrin Capital Crimes Courts.

          Hence the Book of Shmuel and D’ray Ymin/11:38 one of the mighty men; 18:17 \, and Tehillem 7,31, 32, 51. The purpose of the Moshiach to fully conquer the land that all 12 Tribes can keep the Pesach based mitzva known as Yovel: proclaim liberty across the land; establish as the “Temple” the Federal Sanhedrin common law Court system across the land. Herein defines the mitzva of Moshiach by which the prophet Shmuel anointed first Shaul and later David; again with a Torah curse of causing it to rain during the dry season.

          How does Oral Torah common law affix/interpret 2 Shmuel 11 to David failed to try Uriah before a Sanhedrin court for capital crimes? Torah common law stands upon precedents. The precedents for this basic fundamental the vertical court of Par’o which vindicated the beating of Hebrew slaves despite Par’o orders to withhold the necessary straw required to make bricks. Yitro’s rebuke to Moshe – some say made before the revelation of the Torah, some opinion say that rebuke came after the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.

          Yovel vs Pesach learns from the prophet Yehoshua. How do the generations remember the liberation from Egyptian slavery – through the mitzva of the Yovel; furthermore the precedent of acceptance of the yoke of the kingdom of heaven requires remembering Egyptian judicial oppressions. Chazal teaches that for the Yovel to apply as a Torah mitzva that all 12 tribes dwell in liberty in the land.

          If so, why do most rabbinic readings of 2 Shmuel 11-12 fail to directly frame this requirement? Answer: Oral Torah which learns from prior בניני אבות a kabbalah. Torah common law not a statute law legalism. The latter persons can read law decrees codified in legal codes. Examples: of this non kabbalah assimilated Jewish scholarship, the Rambam Yad, the son of the Rosh Tur, and Karo’s commentaries on the Tur Beit Yosef with the Shulkan Aruch cliff notes.

          The common law codes on Talmudic common law B’HaG, Rif, Rosh they fundamentally understand the kabbalah of common law, (Also concealed – meaning not directly mentioned. Why? Torah wisdom commandments require common law precedents – this wisdom concealed from Goyim foreigners who worship other Gods.), as did the Baali Maor commentary on the Rif and the French school of Talmudic common law – the Baali Tosafot.

          Why did the RambaN so strongly dispute with the Baali Maor objections to the Rif common law code? During the Dark Ages Ashkenazi Jewry but Sephardi Jewry too (Rambam had to flee Spain or convert, the son of Ibn Ezra converted to Islam.), experienced extreme distress during the Dark Ages, when the Roman road system had collapse and people stopped almost all international trade due to the chaos and anarchy of those times. Therefore the isolated pockets of exiled Jewish communities requires a simple “so to speak” kitzer shulkan aruch to quickly inform them of Torah culture and customs.

          Chazal rabbis lived during g’lut. G’lut Jewry post the codification of the Mishna (Post the Bar Kochba revolt crushing defeat where the Romans changed the name in 135 from Judea to Palestine.), and Gemara; restricted interpreting the Talmud limited only to morality and religious halachic ritual observances. Chazal – stuck in g’lut did not read the Mishna-Gemara/Talmud as a blue-print for the time when Jews would reconquer the homeland and keep the Yovel. Even the sages of the Talmud openly admit to this fact. Jews during the 2nd Commonwealth never observed the Yovel as a Torah commandment.

          Sanhedrin Capital Crime Courts have jurisdiction only within the borders of the Jewish State free from foreign rule. Hence no real Sanhedrin court existed during the Babylonian Persian Greek and Roman occupations of the land. Just as the Sanhedrin court established by Napoleon a sham Sanhedrin court!

          The Baali Tosafot chief criticism of Rashi’s commentary to the Chumash, his failure (post the 1st Crusades slaughter of almost all the Jews of Germany) to write a common law commentary on the Talmud. Many commentaries on Talmudic aggada as well as upon the Baali Tosafot! But not one of them, no different than the commentaries written on the Yad Rif or Rosh learns the halachot tied to a specific sugya of Gemara which reinterprets a phrase of the Mishna based upon the precedent of Halacha within the Dof (and how much more so off the Dof) of the Gemara. Rather all the commentaries treat halacha as if it stands upon its own two feet rather than as a precedent which views the language of a specific Mishna phrase viewpoint; attempting to duplicate eye witness courtroom testimony.

          The kabbalah of rabbi Yishmael amplifies the 7 middot of Hillel and 10 middot of Akiva. בנין אב means precedent. Precedents apply strictly to common law courtrooms not to statute law religious decrees. The kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s רבוי מיעט opens with a broad assumption and then restricts the din. For example the Gemara learns the opening Mishna of קידושין – אישה נקנית through the precedent of etrog. Just as an immature etrog invalid for the 4 species on Chag Sukkot, so too a young girl does not qualify as אישה. Common law (T’NaCH & Talmudic) stand upon precedents. Statute law does not stand upon precedents.

          A classic proof, hence the Baali Tosafot appear to dispute the Rashi comment, where the latter said that of the 13 middot of Rabbi Yishmael – only the kal v’homer valid for g’lut Jews to use. Absurd, Rashi in his commentary to the NaCH employs a g’zrah shvah! The Baali Tosafot rebuked the טיפש פשט reading of Rashi’s commentary divorced from the context of Rav Ashi sealing the Gemara! Once the Talmud sealed, it became the fixed masoret for all generations of Israel. Hence just as the sages in both the Mishna and Gemara relied on the rabbinic kabbalah of middot so to all generations of Israel could employ a middah employed on a dof of Gemara and by means of a Kal v’homer use it to re-interpret another sugya of gemara!

          The situation of David and Uriah according to Shabbat 56a and Sanhedrin 107a.: “כל האומר דוד חטא אינו אלא טועה”. Batsheva is at least a safek eshet ish, possibly already divorced on condition, which softens the accusation of full-fledged adultery. Tosafot wrestle with the details of this in Bava Metzia 59a. So already in Chazal, the legal axis is not “David skipped a Sanhedrin trial,” but “Uriah was halachically liable as a rebel, and Batsheva’s marital status was halachically complex. However the Talmud clears David but fails to address the k’vanna of the mitzva of Moshiach. Based upon the anarchy and chaos post the generation of Yeshua who conquered the land and established the Yovel through keeping Pesach and brit melah – the sign of the brit of liberty which HaShem and Avram cut at the brit of pieces, once David achieved piece in the land, then his Moshiach anointing required that he establish first the Yovel and then the Temple (not a building of wood and stone), but Federal common law courts like the spokes on a wheel as visioned by the prophets – Jerusalem as the central hub and the cities of refuge as the small sanhedrin spokes.

          King Shlomo the Civil War curse the prophet Natan placed upon David for his failure to trial the capital crimes case of Uria before a Sanhedrin court! King David once he had defeated all foreign kings from off the land he should have immediately established from the Torah the mitzva of Yovel and immediately thereafter restored the Cities of Refuges with their small Sanhedrin Capital Crimes Courts.

          Hence the Book of Shmuel and D’ray Ymin/11:38 one of the mighty men; 18:17 \, and Tehillem 7,31, 32, 51. The purpose of the Moshiach to fully conquer the land that all 12 Tribes can keep the Pesach based mitzva known as Yovel: proclaim liberty across the land; establish as the “Temple” the Federal Sanhedrin common law Court system across the land. Herein defines the mitzva of Moshiach by which the prophet Shmuel anointed first Shaul and later David; again with a Torah curse of causing it to rain during the dry season.

          How does Oral Torah common law affix/interpret 2 Shmuel 11 to David failed to try Uriah before a Sanhedrin court for capital crimes? Torah common law stands upon precedents. The precedents for this basic fundamental the vertical court of Par’o which vindicated the beating of Hebrew slaves despite Par’o orders to withhold the necessary straw required to make bricks. Yitro’s rebuke to Moshe – some say made before the revelation of the Torah, some opinion say that rebuke came after the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.

          Yovel vs Pesach learns from the prophet Yehoshua. How do the generations remember the liberation from Egyptian slavery – through the mitzva of the Yovel; furthermore the precedent of acceptance of the yoke of the kingdom of heaven requires remembering Egyptian judicial oppressions. Chazal teaches that for the Yovel to apply as a Torah mitzva that all 12 tribes dwell in liberty in the land.

          If so, why do most rabbinic readings of 2 Shmuel 11-12 fail to directly frame this requirement? Answer: Oral Torah which learns from prior בניני אבות a kabbalah. Torah common law not a statute law legalism. The latter persons can read law decrees codified in legal codes. Examples: of this non kabbalah assimilated Jewish scholarship, the Rambam Yad, the son of the Rosh Tur, and Karo’s commentaries on the Tur Beit Yosef with the Shulkan Aruch cliff notes.

          The common law codes on Talmudic common law B’HaG, Rif, Rosh they fundamentally understand the kabbalah of common law, (Also concealed – meaning not directly mentioned. Why? Torah wisdom commandments require common law precedents – this wisdom concealed from Goyim foreigners who worship other Gods.), as did the Baali Maor commentary on the Rif and the French school of Talmudic common law – the Baali Tosafot.

          Why did the RambaN so strongly dispute with the Baali Maor objections to the Rif common law code? During the Dark Ages Ashkenazi Jewry but Sephardi Jewry too (Rambam had to flee Spain or convert, the son of Ibn Ezra converted to Islam.), experienced extreme distress during the Dark Ages, when the Roman road system had collapse and people stopped almost all international trade due to the chaos and anarchy of those times. Therefore the isolated pockets of exiled Jewish communities requires a simple “so to speak” kitzer shulkan aruch to quickly inform them of Torah culture and customs.

          Chazal rabbis lived during g’lut. G’lut Jewry post the codification of the Mishna (Post the Bar Kochba revolt crushing defeat where the Romans changed the name in 135 from Judea to Palestine.), and Gemara; restricted interpreting the Talmud limited only to morality and religious halachic ritual observances. Chazal – stuck in g’lut did not read the Mishna-Gemara/Talmud as a blue-print for the time when Jews would reconquer the homeland and keep the Yovel. Even the sages of the Talmud openly admit to this fact. Jews during the 2nd Commonwealth never observed the Yovel as a Torah commandment.

          Sanhedrin Capital Crime Courts have jurisdiction only within the borders of the Jewish State free from foreign rule. Hence no real Sanhedrin court existed during the Babylonian Persian Greek and Roman occupations of the land. Just as the Sanhedrin court established by Napoleon a sham Sanhedrin court!

          The Baali Tosafot chief criticism of Rashi’s commentary to the Chumash, his failure (post the 1st Crusades slaughter of almost all the Jews of Germany) to write a common law commentary on the Talmud. Many commentaries on Talmudic aggada as well as upon the Baali Tosafot! But not one of them, no different than the commentaries written on the Yad Rif or Rosh learns the halachot tied to a specific sugya of Gemara which reinterprets a phrase of the Mishna based upon the precedent of Halacha within the Dof (and how much more so off the Dof) of the Gemara. Rather all the commentaries treat halacha as if it stands upon its own two feet rather than as a precedent which views the language of a specific Mishna phrase viewpoint; attempting to duplicate eye witness courtroom testimony.

          The kabbalah of rabbi Yishmael amplifies the 7 middot of Hillel and 10 middot of Akiva. בנין אב means precedent. Precedents apply strictly to common law courtrooms not to statute law religious decrees. The kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s רבוי מיעט opens with a broad assumption and then restricts the din. For example the Gemara learns the opening Mishna of קידושין – אישה נקנית through the precedent of etrog. Just as an immature etrog invalid for the 4 species on Chag Sukkot, so too a young girl does not qualify as אישה. Common law (T’NaCH & Talmudic) stand upon precedents. Statute law does not stand upon precedents.

          A classic proof, hence the Baali Tosafot appear to dispute the Rashi comment, where the latter said that of the 13 middot of Rabbi Yishmael – only the kal v’homer valid for g’lut Jews to use. Absurd, Rashi in his commentary to the NaCH employs a g’zrah shvah! The Baali Tosafot rebuked the טיפש פשט reading of Rashi’s commentary divorced from the context of Rav Ashi sealing the Gemara! Once the Talmud sealed, it became the fixed masoret for all generations of Israel. Hence just as the sages in both the Mishna and Gemara relied on the rabbinic kabbalah of middot so to all generations of Israel could employ a middah employed on a dof of Gemara and by means of a Kal v’homer use it to re-interpret another sugya of gemara!

          The situation of David and Uriah according to Shabbat 56a and Sanhedrin 107a.: “כל האומר דוד חטא אינו אלא טועה”. Batsheva is at least a safek eshet ish, possibly already divorced on condition, which softens the accusation of full-fledged adultery. Tosafot wrestle with the details of this in Bava Metzia 59a. So already in Chazal, the legal axis is not “David skipped a Sanhedrin trial,” but “Uriah was halachically liable as a rebel, and Batsheva’s marital status was halachically complex. However the Talmud clears David but fails to address the k’vanna of the mitzva of Moshiach. Based upon the anarchy and chaos post the generation of Yeshua who conquered the land and established the Yovel through keeping Pesach and brit melah – the sign of the brit of liberty which HaShem and Avram cut at the brit of pieces, once David achieved piece in the land, then his Moshiach anointing required that he establish first the Yovel and then the Temple (not a building of wood and stone), but Federal common law courts like the spokes on a wheel as visioned by the prophets – Jerusalem as the central hub and the cities of refuge as the small sanhedrin spokes.

          Clearly the prophet Yermia conditioned a blessing from g’lut to keeping the Yovel. The mitzva of Moshiach a mitzva from the Torah, not the later prophets. The 13 tohor middot (“אל רחום וחנון”) in g’lut liturgy in the Jewish state institutional design which the prophet Yermia referred to as ברית חדש; to make the middot of HaShem the DNA of courts, land tenure, debt release, refuge, and royal power etc. To ensure that no din melech exists without Sanhedrin משנה תורה legislative review.

      44. 

          moshe kerr

          June 18, 2026 at 6:11 pm

          Noise. Anybody can say anything. The church known for accusing Jews of murdering Xtian babies and using their blood to make Pesach matza. You keep repeating the same claim, but have yet to prove it.

      45. 

          moshe kerr

          June 18, 2026 at 6:12 pm

          Declarations about the NT don’t amount to squat.

      46. 

          moshe kerr

          June 18, 2026 at 6:38 pm

          2 Jews 3 opinions LOL

      47. 

          paraleaglenm

          June 19, 2026 at 3:45 am

          People . . . groups . . . they thrive on ignorance and attack anyone who goes beyond the norm. The psychoanalyst Otto Rank studied this to explain myth, how an individual with extraordinary experience could re-enter the group.

          But the Jews are hated. I am the victim of anti-Semitism of the church, churches . . . ganged up on by a group of Catholic boys for ‘killing Christ.’
          I was held back and hurt badly by school authorities in Junior and Senior High Schools.
          My own wife called me a ‘dirty Jew.’ The church kicked me out, and I think they didn’t like the fact that I was originally a Jew.

          I am not comfortable with Jews. I think the yarmulkes worn in public are embarrassing. The Hassidics are the worst with the hats and forelocks. And
          their refusal to serve in the military because their Talmudic studies were more important, well, then you see Israeli girls fresh out of high school
          in the IDF. Again–embarrassing.

          I read the classics, the philosophers, Tacitus, Cicero, . . . and the New Testament is an amazing channel to the past, witnesses reporting from that
          era about the Christ. But your utter rejection is fear, that there might be something there.

      48. 

          moshe kerr

          June 19, 2026 at 6:20 am

          Do not wear a kippa except in formal occasion like as did Begin as PM.

          King Shlomo the Civil War curse the prophet Natan placed upon David for his failure to trial the capital crimes case of Uria before a Sanhedrin court! King David once he had defeated all foreign kings from off the land he should have immediately established from the Torah the mitzva of Yovel and immediately thereafter restored the Cities of Refuges with their small Sanhedrin Capital Crimes Courts.

          Hence the Book of Shmuel and D’ray Ymin/11:38 one of the mighty men; 18:17 \, and Tehillem 7,31, 32, 51. The purpose of the Moshiach to fully conquer the land that all 12 Tribes can keep the Pesach based mitzva known as Yovel: proclaim liberty across the land; establish as the “Temple” the Federal Sanhedrin common law Court system across the land. Herein defines the mitzva of Moshiach by which the prophet Shmuel anointed first Shaul and later David; again with a Torah curse of causing it to rain during the dry season.

          How does Oral Torah common law affix/interpret 2 Shmuel 11 to David failed to try Uriah before a Sanhedrin court for capital crimes? Torah common law stands upon precedents. The precedents for this basic fundamental the vertical court of Par’o which vindicated the beating of Hebrew slaves despite Par’o orders to withhold the necessary straw required to make bricks. Yitro’s rebuke to Moshe – some say made before the revelation of the Torah, some opinion say that rebuke came after the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.

          Yovel vs Pesach learns from the prophet Yehoshua. How do the generations remember the liberation from Egyptian slavery – through the mitzva of the Yovel; furthermore the precedent of acceptance of the yoke of the kingdom of heaven requires remembering Egyptian judicial oppressions. Chazal teaches that for the Yovel to apply as a Torah mitzva that all 12 tribes dwell in liberty in the land.

          If so, why do most rabbinic readings of 2 Shmuel 11-12 fail to directly frame this requirement? Answer: Oral Torah which learns from prior בניני אבות a kabbalah. Torah common law not a statute law legalism. The latter persons can read law decrees codified in legal codes. Examples: of this non kabbalah assimilated Jewish scholarship, the Rambam Yad, the son of the Rosh Tur, and Karo’s commentaries on the Tur Beit Yosef with the Shulkan Aruch cliff notes.

          The common law codes on Talmudic common law B’HaG, Rif, Rosh they fundamentally understand the kabbalah of common law, (Also concealed – meaning not directly mentioned. Why? Torah wisdom commandments require common law precedents – this wisdom concealed from Goyim foreigners who worship other Gods.), as did the Baali Maor commentary on the Rif and the French school of Talmudic common law – the Baali Tosafot.

          Why did the RambaN so strongly dispute with the Baali Maor objections to the Rif common law code? During the Dark Ages Ashkenazi Jewry but Sephardi Jewry too (Rambam had to flee Spain or convert, the son of Ibn Ezra converted to Islam.), experienced extreme distress during the Dark Ages, when the Roman road system had collapse and people stopped almost all international trade due to the chaos and anarchy of those times. Therefore the isolated pockets of exiled Jewish communities requires a simple “so to speak” kitzer shulkan aruch to quickly inform them of Torah culture and customs.

          Chazal rabbis lived during g’lut. G’lut Jewry post the codification of the Mishna (Post the Bar Kochba revolt crushing defeat where the Romans changed the name in 135 from Judea to Palestine.), and Gemara; restricted interpreting the Talmud limited only to morality and religious halachic ritual observances. Chazal – stuck in g’lut did not read the Mishna-Gemara/Talmud as a blue-print for the time when Jews would reconquer the homeland and keep the Yovel. Even the sages of the Talmud openly admit to this fact. Jews during the 2nd Commonwealth never observed the Yovel as a Torah commandment.

          Sanhedrin Capital Crime Courts have jurisdiction only within the borders of the Jewish State free from foreign rule. Hence no real Sanhedrin court existed during the Babylonian Persian Greek and Roman occupations of the land. Just as the Sanhedrin court established by Napoleon a sham Sanhedrin court!

          The Baali Tosafot chief criticism of Rashi’s commentary to the Chumash, his failure (post the 1st Crusades slaughter of almost all the Jews of Germany) to write a common law commentary on the Talmud. Many commentaries on Talmudic aggada as well as upon the Baali Tosafot! But not one of them, no different than the commentaries written on the Yad Rif or Rosh learns the halachot tied to a specific sugya of Gemara which reinterprets a phrase of the Mishna based upon the precedent of Halacha within the Dof (and how much more so off the Dof) of the Gemara. Rather all the commentaries treat halacha as if it stands upon its own two feet rather than as a precedent which views the language of a specific Mishna phrase viewpoint; attempting to duplicate eye witness courtroom testimony.

          The kabbalah of rabbi Yishmael amplifies the 7 middot of Hillel and 10 middot of Akiva. בנין אב means precedent. Precedents apply strictly to common law courtrooms not to statute law religious decrees. The kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s רבוי מיעט opens with a broad assumption and then restricts the din. For example the Gemara learns the opening Mishna of קידושין – אישה נקנית through the precedent of etrog. Just as an immature etrog invalid for the 4 species on Chag Sukkot, so too a young girl does not qualify as אישה. Common law (T’NaCH & Talmudic) stand upon precedents. Statute law does not stand upon precedents.

          A classic proof, hence the Baali Tosafot appear to dispute the Rashi comment, where the latter said that of the 13 middot of Rabbi Yishmael – only the kal v’homer valid for g’lut Jews to use. Absurd, Rashi in his commentary to the NaCH employs a g’zrah shvah! The Baali Tosafot rebuked the טיפש פשט reading of Rashi’s commentary divorced from the context of Rav Ashi sealing the Gemara! Once the Talmud sealed, it became the fixed masoret for all generations of Israel. Hence just as the sages in both the Mishna and Gemara relied on the rabbinic kabbalah of middot so to all generations of Israel could employ a middah employed on a dof of Gemara and by means of a Kal v’homer use it to re-interpret another sugya of gemara!

          The situation of David and Uriah according to Shabbat 56a and Sanhedrin 107a.: “כל האומר דוד חטא אינו אלא טועה”. Batsheva is at least a safek eshet ish, possibly already divorced on condition, which softens the accusation of full-fledged adultery. Tosafot wrestle with the details of this in Bava Metzia 59a. So already in Chazal, the legal axis is not “David skipped a Sanhedrin trial,” but “Uriah was halachically liable as a rebel, and Batsheva’s marital status was halachically complex. However the Talmud clears David but fails to address the k’vanna of the mitzva of Moshiach. Based upon the anarchy and chaos post the generation of Yeshua who conquered the land and established the Yovel through keeping Pesach and brit melah – the sign of the brit of liberty which HaShem and Avram cut at the brit of pieces, once David achieved piece in the land, then his Moshiach anointing required that he establish first the Yovel and then the Temple (not a building of wood and stone), but Federal common law courts like the spokes on a wheel as visioned by the prophets – Jerusalem as the central hub and the cities of refuge as the small sanhedrin spokes.

          King Shlomo the Civil War curse the prophet Natan placed upon David for his failure to trial the capital crimes case of Uria before a Sanhedrin court! King David once he had defeated all foreign kings from off the land he should have immediately established from the Torah the mitzva of Yovel and immediately thereafter restored the Cities of Refuges with their small Sanhedrin Capital Crimes Courts.

          Hence the Book of Shmuel and D’ray Ymin/11:38 one of the mighty men; 18:17 \, and Tehillem 7,31, 32, 51. The purpose of the Moshiach to fully conquer the land that all 12 Tribes can keep the Pesach based mitzva known as Yovel: proclaim liberty across the land; establish as the “Temple” the Federal Sanhedrin common law Court system across the land. Herein defines the mitzva of Moshiach by which the prophet Shmuel anointed first Shaul and later David; again with a Torah curse of causing it to rain during the dry season.

          How does Oral Torah common law affix/interpret 2 Shmuel 11 to David failed to try Uriah before a Sanhedrin court for capital crimes? Torah common law stands upon precedents. The precedents for this basic fundamental the vertical court of Par’o which vindicated the beating of Hebrew slaves despite Par’o orders to withhold the necessary straw required to make bricks. Yitro’s rebuke to Moshe – some say made before the revelation of the Torah, some opinion say that rebuke came after the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.

          Yovel vs Pesach learns from the prophet Yehoshua. How do the generations remember the liberation from Egyptian slavery – through the mitzva of the Yovel; furthermore the precedent of acceptance of the yoke of the kingdom of heaven requires remembering Egyptian judicial oppressions. Chazal teaches that for the Yovel to apply as a Torah mitzva that all 12 tribes dwell in liberty in the land.

          If so, why do most rabbinic readings of 2 Shmuel 11-12 fail to directly frame this requirement? Answer: Oral Torah which learns from prior בניני אבות a kabbalah. Torah common law not a statute law legalism. The latter persons can read law decrees codified in legal codes. Examples: of this non kabbalah assimilated Jewish scholarship, the Rambam Yad, the son of the Rosh Tur, and Karo’s commentaries on the Tur Beit Yosef with the Shulkan Aruch cliff notes.

          The common law codes on Talmudic common law B’HaG, Rif, Rosh they fundamentally understand the kabbalah of common law, (Also concealed – meaning not directly mentioned. Why? Torah wisdom commandments require common law precedents – this wisdom concealed from Goyim foreigners who worship other Gods.), as did the Baali Maor commentary on the Rif and the French school of Talmudic common law – the Baali Tosafot.

          Why did the RambaN so strongly dispute with the Baali Maor objections to the Rif common law code? During the Dark Ages Ashkenazi Jewry but Sephardi Jewry too (Rambam had to flee Spain or convert, the son of Ibn Ezra converted to Islam.), experienced extreme distress during the Dark Ages, when the Roman road system had collapse and people stopped almost all international trade due to the chaos and anarchy of those times. Therefore the isolated pockets of exiled Jewish communities requires a simple “so to speak” kitzer shulkan aruch to quickly inform them of Torah culture and customs.

          Chazal rabbis lived during g’lut. G’lut Jewry post the codification of the Mishna (Post the Bar Kochba revolt crushing defeat where the Romans changed the name in 135 from Judea to Palestine.), and Gemara; restricted interpreting the Talmud limited only to morality and religious halachic ritual observances. Chazal – stuck in g’lut did not read the Mishna-Gemara/Talmud as a blue-print for the time when Jews would reconquer the homeland and keep the Yovel. Even the sages of the Talmud openly admit to this fact. Jews during the 2nd Commonwealth never observed the Yovel as a Torah commandment.

          Sanhedrin Capital Crime Courts have jurisdiction only within the borders of the Jewish State free from foreign rule. Hence no real Sanhedrin court existed during the Babylonian Persian Greek and Roman occupations of the land. Just as the Sanhedrin court established by Napoleon a sham Sanhedrin court!

          The Baali Tosafot chief criticism of Rashi’s commentary to the Chumash, his failure (post the 1st Crusades slaughter of almost all the Jews of Germany) to write a common law commentary on the Talmud. Many commentaries on Talmudic aggada as well as upon the Baali Tosafot! But not one of them, no different than the commentaries written on the Yad Rif or Rosh learns the halachot tied to a specific sugya of Gemara which reinterprets a phrase of the Mishna based upon the precedent of Halacha within the Dof (and how much more so off the Dof) of the Gemara. Rather all the commentaries treat halacha as if it stands upon its own two feet rather than as a precedent which views the language of a specific Mishna phrase viewpoint; attempting to duplicate eye witness courtroom testimony.

          The kabbalah of rabbi Yishmael amplifies the 7 middot of Hillel and 10 middot of Akiva. בנין אב means precedent. Precedents apply strictly to common law courtrooms not to statute law religious decrees. The kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s רבוי מיעט opens with a broad assumption and then restricts the din. For example the Gemara learns the opening Mishna of קידושין – אישה נקנית through the precedent of etrog. Just as an immature etrog invalid for the 4 species on Chag Sukkot, so too a young girl does not qualify as אישה. Common law (T’NaCH & Talmudic) stand upon precedents. Statute law does not stand upon precedents.

          A classic proof, hence the Baali Tosafot appear to dispute the Rashi comment, where the latter said that of the 13 middot of Rabbi Yishmael – only the kal v’homer valid for g’lut Jews to use. Absurd, Rashi in his commentary to the NaCH employs a g’zrah shvah! The Baali Tosafot rebuked the טיפש פשט reading of Rashi’s commentary divorced from the context of Rav Ashi sealing the Gemara! Once the Talmud sealed, it became the fixed masoret for all generations of Israel. Hence just as the sages in both the Mishna and Gemara relied on the rabbinic kabbalah of middot so to all generations of Israel could employ a middah employed on a dof of Gemara and by means of a Kal v’homer use it to re-interpret another sugya of gemara!

          The situation of David and Uriah according to Shabbat 56a and Sanhedrin 107a.: “כל האומר דוד חטא אינו אלא טועה”. Batsheva is at least a safek eshet ish, possibly already divorced on condition, which softens the accusation of full-fledged adultery. Tosafot wrestle with the details of this in Bava Metzia 59a. So already in Chazal, the legal axis is not “David skipped a Sanhedrin trial,” but “Uriah was halachically liable as a rebel, and Batsheva’s marital status was halachically complex. However the Talmud clears David but fails to address the k’vanna of the mitzva of Moshiach. Based upon the anarchy and chaos post the generation of Yeshua who conquered the land and established the Yovel through keeping Pesach and brit melah – the sign of the brit of liberty which HaShem and Avram cut at the brit of pieces, once David achieved piece in the land, then his Moshiach anointing required that he establish first the Yovel and then the Temple (not a building of wood and stone), but Federal common law courts like the spokes on a wheel as visioned by the prophets – Jerusalem as the central hub and the cities of refuge as the small sanhedrin spokes.

          Clearly the prophet Yermia conditioned a blessing from g’lut to keeping the Yovel. The mitzva of Moshiach a mitzva from the Torah, not the later prophets. The 13 tohor middot (“אל רחום וחנון”) in g’lut liturgy in the Jewish state institutional design which the prophet Yermia referred to as ברית חדש; to make the middot of HaShem the DNA of courts, land tenure, debt release, refuge, and royal power etc. To ensure that no din melech exists without Sanhedrin משנה תורה legislative review.

      49. 

          moshe kerr

          June 19, 2026 at 1:49 pm

          Would like your response to

          Restoring Legislative Review: Neither Shaul tried David nor David tried Uriah before the Bar of a Sanhedrin Capital Crimes Court.

          King Shlomo the Civil War curse the prophet Natan placed upon David for his failure to trial the capital crimes case of Uria before a Sanhedrin court! King David once he had defeated all foreign kings from off the land he should have immediately established from the Torah the mitzva of Yovel and immediately thereafter restored the Cities of Refuges with their small Sanhedrin Capital Crimes Courts. The window of opportunity of anointing a king to fight the necessary wars for all the 12 Tribes to celebrate the Yovel liberty slammed shut when שישק conquered Yerushalem and profaned the Holy of Holies by stealing the golden shields. NaCH commands mussar it does not teach history; based upon the Torat Moshe whose written Torah ideally functions as the Constitution of the republic and directly mandates Sanhedrin common law courts.

          Hence the Book of Shmuel and D’ray Ymin/11:10–47 & 12:1–40 lists Uriah as one of the mighty men; and likewise Tehillem 51 makes reference to Uriah. The purpose of the Moshiach to fully conquer the land that all 12 Tribes can keep the Pesach based mitzva known as Yovel: proclaim liberty across the land; establish as the “Temple” the Federal Sanhedrin common law Court system across this land. Herein defines the mitzva of Moshiach by which the prophet Shmuel anointed first Shaul and later David; again with a Torah curse of causing it to rain during the dry season, because the oath to the Avot had already blessed their seed to conquer these lands. But the people rebelled and demanded a king to fight their wars.

          How does Oral Torah common law affix/interpret 2 Shmuel 11 to David failed to try Uriah before a Sanhedrin court for capital crimes? Torah common law stands upon precedents. The precedents for this basic fundamental the vertical court of Par’o which vindicated the beating of Hebrew slaves despite Par’o orders to withhold the necessary straw required to make bricks. Yitro’s rebuke to Moshe – some say made before the revelation of the Torah, some opinion say that rebuke came after the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.

          Yovel vs Pesach learns from the prophet Yehoshua. How do the generations remember the liberation from Egyptian slavery – through the mitzva of the Yovel; furthermore the precedent of acceptance of the yoke of the kingdom of heaven requires remembering Egyptian judicial oppressions. Chazal teaches that for the Yovel to apply as a Torah mitzva that all 12 tribes dwell in liberty in the land.

          If so, why do most rabbinic readings of 2 Shmuel 11-12 fail to directly frame this requirement? Answer: Oral Torah which learns from prior בניני אבות a kabbalah. Torah common law not a statute law legalism. The latter persons can read law decrees codified in legal codes. Examples: of this non kabbalah assimilated Jewish scholarship, the Rambam Yad, the son of the Rosh Tur, and Karo’s commentaries on the Tur Beit Yosef with the Shulkan Aruch cliff notes.

          The common law codes on Talmudic common law B’HaG, Rif, Rosh they fundamentally understand the kabbalah of common law, (Also concealed – meaning not directly mentioned. Why? Torah wisdom commandments require common law precedents – this wisdom concealed from Goyim foreigners who worship other Gods.), as did the Baali Maor commentary on the Rif and the French school of Talmudic common law – the Baali Tosafot.

          Why did the RambaN so strongly dispute with the Baali Maor objections to the Rif common law code? During the Dark Ages Ashkenazi Jewry but Sephardi Jewry too (Rambam had to flee Spain or convert, the son of Ibn Ezra converted to Islam.), experienced extreme distress during the Dark Ages, when the Roman road system had collapse and people stopped almost all international trade due to the chaos and anarchy of those times. Therefore the isolated pockets of exiled Jewish communities requires a simple “so to speak” kitzer shulkan aruch to quickly inform them of Torah culture and customs.

          Chazal rabbis lived during g’lut. G’lut Jewry post the codification of the Mishna (Post the Bar Kochba revolt crushing defeat where the Romans changed the name in 135 from Judea to Palestine.), and Gemara; restricted interpreting the Talmud limited only to morality and religious halachic ritual observances. Chazal – stuck in g’lut did not read the Mishna-Gemara/Talmud as a blue-print for the time when Jews would reconquer the homeland and keep the Yovel. Even the sages of the Talmud openly admit to this fact. Jews during the 2nd Commonwealth never observed the Yovel as a Torah commandment.

          Sanhedrin Capital Crime Courts have jurisdiction only within the borders of the Jewish State free from foreign rule. Hence no real Sanhedrin court existed during the Babylonian Persian Greek and Roman occupations of the land. Just as the Sanhedrin court established by Napoleon a sham Sanhedrin court!

          The Baali Tosafot chief criticism of Rashi’s commentary to the Chumash, his failure (post the 1st Crusades slaughter of almost all the Jews of Germany) to write a common law commentary on the Talmud. Many commentaries on Talmudic aggada as well as upon the Baali Tosafot! But not one of them, no different than the commentaries written on the Yad Rif or Rosh learns the halachot tied to a specific sugya of Gemara which reinterprets a phrase of the Mishna based upon the precedent of Halacha within the Dof (and how much more so off the Dof) of the Gemara. Rather all the commentaries treat halacha as if it stands upon its own two feet rather than as a precedent which views the language of a specific Mishna phrase viewpoint; attempting to duplicate eye witness courtroom testimony.

          The kabbalah of rabbi Yishmael amplifies the 7 middot of Hillel and 10 middot of Akiva. בנין אב means precedent. Precedents apply strictly to common law courtrooms not to statute law religious decrees. The kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s רבוי מיעט opens with a broad assumption and then restricts the din. For example the Gemara learns the opening Mishna of קידושין – אישה נקנית through the precedent of etrog. Just as an immature etrog invalid for the 4 species on Chag Sukkot, so too a young girl does not qualify as אישה. Common law (T’NaCH & Talmudic) stand upon precedents. Statute law does not stand upon precedents.

          A classic proof, hence the Baali Tosafot appear to dispute the Rashi comment, where the latter said that of the 13 middot of Rabbi Yishmael – only the kal v’homer valid for g’lut Jews to use. Absurd, Rashi in his commentary to the NaCH employs a g’zrah shvah! The Baali Tosafot rebuked the טיפש פשט reading of Rashi’s commentary divorced from the context of Rav Ashi sealing the Gemara! Once the Talmud sealed, it became the fixed masoret for all generations of Israel. Hence just as the sages in both the Mishna and Gemara relied on the rabbinic kabbalah of middot so to all generations of Israel could employ a middah employed on a dof of Gemara and by means of a Kal v’homer use it to re-interpret another sugya of gemara!

          The situation of David and Uriah according to Shabbat 56a and Sanhedrin 107a.: “כל האומר דוד חטא אינו אלא טועה”. Batsheva is at least a safek eshet ish, possibly already divorced on condition, which softens the accusation of full-fledged adultery. Tosafot wrestle with the details of this in Bava Metzia 59a. So already in Chazal, the legal axis is not “David skipped a Sanhedrin trial,” but “Uriah was halachically liable as a rebel, and Batsheva’s marital status was halachically complex. However the Talmud clears David but fails to address the k’vanna of the mitzva of Moshiach. Based upon the anarchy and chaos post the generation of Yeshua who conquered the land and established the Yovel through keeping Pesach and brit melah – the sign of the brit of liberty which HaShem and Avram cut at the brit of pieces, once David achieved piece in the land, then his Moshiach anointing required that he establish first the Yovel and then the Temple (not a building of wood and stone), but Federal common law courts like the spokes on a wheel as visioned by the prophets – Jerusalem as the central hub and the cities of refuge as the small sanhedrin spokes.

          King Shlomo the Civil War curse the prophet Natan placed upon David for his failure to trial the capital crimes case of Uria before a Sanhedrin court! King David once he had defeated all foreign kings from off the land he should have immediately established from the Torah the mitzva of Yovel and immediately thereafter restored the Cities of Refuges with their small Sanhedrin Capital Crimes Courts.

          Hence the Book of Shmuel and D’ray Ymin/11:38 one of the mighty men; 18:17 \, and Tehillem 7,31, 32, 51. The purpose of the Moshiach to fully conquer the land that all 12 Tribes can keep the Pesach based mitzva known as Yovel: proclaim liberty across the land; establish as the “Temple” the Federal Sanhedrin common law Court system across the land. Herein defines the mitzva of Moshiach by which the prophet Shmuel anointed first Shaul and later David; again with a Torah curse of causing it to rain during the dry season.

          How does Oral Torah common law affix/interpret 2 Shmuel 11 to David failed to try Uriah before a Sanhedrin court for capital crimes? Torah common law stands upon precedents. The precedents for this basic fundamental the vertical court of Par’o which vindicated the beating of Hebrew slaves despite Par’o orders to withhold the necessary straw required to make bricks. Yitro’s rebuke to Moshe – some say made before the revelation of the Torah, some opinion say that rebuke came after the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.

          Yovel vs Pesach learns from the prophet Yehoshua. How do the generations remember the liberation from Egyptian slavery – through the mitzva of the Yovel; furthermore the precedent of acceptance of the yoke of the kingdom of heaven requires remembering Egyptian judicial oppressions. Chazal teaches that for the Yovel to apply as a Torah mitzva that all 12 tribes dwell in liberty in the land.

          If so, why do most rabbinic readings of 2 Shmuel 11-12 fail to directly frame this requirement? Answer: Oral Torah which learns from prior בניני אבות a kabbalah. Torah common law not a statute law legalism. The latter persons can read law decrees codified in legal codes. Examples: of this non kabbalah assimilated Jewish scholarship, the Rambam Yad, the son of the Rosh Tur, and Karo’s commentaries on the Tur Beit Yosef with the Shulkan Aruch cliff notes.

          The common law codes on Talmudic common law B’HaG, Rif, Rosh they fundamentally understand the kabbalah of common law, (Also concealed – meaning not directly mentioned. Why? Torah wisdom commandments require common law precedents – this wisdom concealed from Goyim foreigners who worship other Gods.), as did the Baali Maor commentary on the Rif and the French school of Talmudic common law – the Baali Tosafot.

          Why did the RambaN so strongly dispute with the Baali Maor objections to the Rif common law code? During the Dark Ages Ashkenazi Jewry but Sephardi Jewry too (Rambam had to flee Spain or convert, the son of Ibn Ezra converted to Islam.), experienced extreme distress during the Dark Ages, when the Roman road system had collapse and people stopped almost all international trade due to the chaos and anarchy of those times. Therefore the isolated pockets of exiled Jewish communities requires a simple “so to speak” kitzer shulkan aruch to quickly inform them of Torah culture and customs.

          Chazal rabbis lived during g’lut. G’lut Jewry post the codification of the Mishna (Post the Bar Kochba revolt crushing defeat where the Romans changed the name in 135 from Judea to Palestine.), and Gemara; restricted interpreting the Talmud limited only to morality and religious halachic ritual observances. Chazal – stuck in g’lut did not read the Mishna-Gemara/Talmud as a blue-print for the time when Jews would reconquer the homeland and keep the Yovel. Even the sages of the Talmud openly admit to this fact. Jews during the 2nd Commonwealth never observed the Yovel as a Torah commandment.

          Sanhedrin Capital Crime Courts have jurisdiction only within the borders of the Jewish State free from foreign rule. Hence no real Sanhedrin court existed during the Babylonian Persian Greek and Roman occupations of the land. Just as the Sanhedrin court established by Napoleon a sham Sanhedrin court!

          The Baali Tosafot chief criticism of Rashi’s commentary to the Chumash, his failure (post the 1st Crusades slaughter of almost all the Jews of Germany) to write a common law commentary on the Talmud. Many commentaries on Talmudic aggada as well as upon the Baali Tosafot! But not one of them, no different than the commentaries written on the Yad Rif or Rosh learns the halachot tied to a specific sugya of Gemara which reinterprets a phrase of the Mishna based upon the precedent of Halacha within the Dof (and how much more so off the Dof) of the Gemara. Rather all the commentaries treat halacha as if it stands upon its own two feet rather than as a precedent which views the language of a specific Mishna phrase viewpoint; attempting to duplicate eye witness courtroom testimony.

          The kabbalah of rabbi Yishmael amplifies the 7 middot of Hillel and 10 middot of Akiva. בנין אב means precedent. Precedents apply strictly to common law courtrooms not to statute law religious decrees. The kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s רבוי מיעט opens with a broad assumption and then restricts the din. For example the Gemara learns the opening Mishna of קידושין – אישה נקנית through the precedent of etrog. Just as an immature etrog invalid for the 4 species on Chag Sukkot, so too a young girl does not qualify as אישה. Common law (T’NaCH & Talmudic) stand upon precedents. Statute law does not stand upon precedents.

          A classic proof, hence the Baali Tosafot appear to dispute the Rashi comment, where the latter said that of the 13 middot of Rabbi Yishmael – only the kal v’homer valid for g’lut Jews to use. Absurd, Rashi in his commentary to the NaCH employs a g’zrah shvah! The Baali Tosafot rebuked the טיפש פשט reading of Rashi’s commentary divorced from the context of Rav Ashi sealing the Gemara! Once the Talmud sealed, it became the fixed masoret for all generations of Israel. Hence just as the sages in both the Mishna and Gemara relied on the rabbinic kabbalah of middot so to all generations of Israel could employ a middah employed on a dof of Gemara and by means of a Kal v’homer use it to re-interpret another sugya of gemara!

          The situation of David and Uriah according to Shabbat 56a and Sanhedrin 107a.: “כל האומר דוד חטא אינו אלא טועה”. Batsheva is at least a safek eshet ish, possibly already divorced on condition, which softens the accusation of full-fledged adultery. Tosafot wrestle with the details of this in Bava Metzia 59a. So already in Chazal, the legal axis is not “David skipped a Sanhedrin trial,” but “Uriah was halachically liable as a rebel, and Batsheva’s marital status was halachically complex. However the Talmud clears David but fails to address the k’vanna of the mitzva of Moshiach. Based upon the anarchy and chaos post the generation of Yeshua who conquered the land and established the Yovel through keeping Pesach and brit melah – the sign of the brit of liberty which HaShem and Avram cut at the brit of pieces, once David achieved piece in the land, then his Moshiach anointing required that he establish first the Yovel and then the Temple (not a building of wood and stone), but Federal common law courts like the spokes on a wheel as visioned by the prophets – Jerusalem as the central hub and the cities of refuge as the small sanhedrin spokes.

          Clearly the prophet Yermia conditioned a blessing from g’lut to keeping the Yovel. The mitzva of Moshiach a mitzva from the Torah, not the later prophets. The 13 tohor middot (“אל רחום וחנון”) in g’lut liturgy in the Jewish state institutional design which the prophet Yermia referred to as ברית חדש; to make the middot of HaShem the DNA of courts, land tenure, debt release, refuge, and royal power etc. To ensure that no din melech exists without Sanhedrin משנה תורה legislative review.

      50. 

          paraleaglenm

          June 20, 2026 at 10:00 am

          The problem is that Christ completed the Covenant with Moses, and the law is no longer administered by the priests or through daily sacrifices, or centered around the Temple of Jerusalem.
          The NT story of what is called the Transfiguration is pretty amazing, with Moses, Elijah, and Jesus shown together in spirit and God affirming Jesus as his son.

          The proof of this is that the Old Testament, the Septuagint, the Five Books of Moses, and the Torah are studied more now by the gentiles than the Jews themselves. The Word of God went out
          into the entire world.

          But Islam is the problem at hand. That ‘Ten Year’ manual of war, verses of evil upon mankind professed by the Muslims to justify every bad thing they do in the name of Allah, in their attempt
          through war to steal the inheritance of Isaac and Jacob and divert it to Ishmael and the Arabs. The Muslims stole Jerusalem and built a mosque upon the Dome of the Rock, to make their claim
          to Abraham. This is why there is war.

      51. 

          moshe kerr

          June 20, 2026 at 6:13 pm

          Impossible to “complete the Torah”. LOL

      52. 

          paraleaglenm

          June 20, 2026 at 11:16 pm

          The Christ’s last words were, ‘It is finished,’ completing his task and sacrifice and it didn’t end there.

          Jerusalem fell, the temple destroyed one final time, the Jews fleeing taking the Torah with them.

          But here is a serious question:
          If Christ had not led the apostles, no epistles and the books of Paul, Luke, Mark and John would have been written.
          If we can stipulate that the short ministry of Christ resulted in those books and letters, which would have resulted in the Jewish bible read throughout the
          world and translated into almost every language?
          The Apostles traveling and teaching?
          Or the Jews in their diaspora?

          Serious question.

      53. 

          moshe kerr

          June 21, 2026 at 5:24 am

          Harry Potter also said it is finished when he confronted the Dark Lord prepared to die! Facts clear as the sun in the sky. The NT/gospel fraud does not comprehend any wisdom Torah time-oriented commandments not shabbat not kre’a shma, not tefillah, and not Moshiach. Just that simple.

      54. 

          paraleaglenm

          June 21, 2026 at 7:18 am

          You didn’t answer the question.

          I’ve had enough of this. No more comments.

      55. 

          moshe kerr

          June 21, 2026 at 8:50 am

          Thanks for the conversation.

      56. 

          moshe kerr

          June 21, 2026 at 5:45 am

          What made the clash between Ambassador Danny Danon and Vanessa Frazier so volatile? Not the mere act of an interruption, but the breakdown of diplomatic decorum.

          Rather than a quiet, procedural enforcement, it devolved into a direct, public shouting match over the validity of a highly sensitive, polarizing UN report. The UN General Assembly Resolution 3379 (passed in 1975, which infamously declared “Zionism is Racism”) goes straight to the heart of Israel’s long-standing critique of the United Nations. Where political bloc voting – driven by GA majorities and explicit ideological condemnation directly compares to the current UN bureaucrapic blacklisting of Israel, driven by NGO and Agency Reports; framed as “Institutional – verified evidence”.

          Yet when Israeli ambassador Dannon directly challenged Vanessa Frazier (acting as the UN Secretary‑General’s Special Representative for Children and Armed Conflict and intervened during the June 19, 2026) over her failure to personally investigate the charges herself? She exploded with a vitriol-laced temper-tantrum – as if Dannon had pulled down her panties and spanked her butt.

          The 1975 UN slander, explicitly political and ideological, aimed directly at the foundational legitimacy of the Israeli state. Israel views the Frazier incident as a continuation of historical bias. From the Israeli perspective, when a UN official aggressively interrupts a sovereign ambassador defending his nation against a highly controversial “blacklist,” it demonstrates that the UN apparatus is no longer acting as a neutral arbiter. Instead, it is acting as an active political adversary—sheltering its own controversial reports from legitimate diplomatic oversight while holding Israel to a separate standard of scrutiny not applied to other global conflicts.

      57. 

          moshe kerr

          June 15, 2026 at 10:23 am

          Yovel defined through the opening mussar Books of NaCH

          Kedesh – one of the six cities of refuge – located in the territory of the Tribe of Dan. Shimshon acted as a judge during his lifetime, but did not sit as a judge within Kedesh. Rather he served as a judge embodied to resolve the inter-state conflict between Yechuda/Shimon against Philistine dominance and oppression. This implies that while the wars remained that Israel could not keep the Yovel. This would explain why not till king David destroyed the Philistines from off the land, that Israel could only there after keep the Yovel.

          Why did king Shlomo confuse building a cathedral of wood and stone rather than establish the Federal Sanhedrin court system as the Torah constitutionally בית המקדש? Confusing the priorities of constructing a Central Place of worship for the Torah mandated Sanhedrin court system – a fundamental av tuma avoda zarah. The revelation of the Mishkan at Sinai centered not on leather skins and gold plated vessels but rather תורה לא בשמים היא. תפילה הדבר שבלבב.

          The prophetic mussar of Natan rebuked David over Uriah not brought before a Sanhedrin court. The mussar of the prophet Natan employed “the blood on David’s hands which caused the curse of eternal civil war within the house of David. Just as king Shlomo ignored the elder advice of Natan concerning construction of the בית המקדש so too Rehova’am placed no weight upon the advice given by Shlomo’s elder advisors.

          No prophetic commandment to build a House of Cedar. A direct Torah commandment to righteously pursue justice among our people. King Shlomo did not pursue justice, he prioritized pursuing women. Torah defines faith as pursuit of justice. Avoda zarah defines faith as belief in some theological creed which shapes and defines the Gods worshipped in other societies and religions. The mitzva of Moshiach, a wisdom time-oriented positive Torah commandment to rule the conquered land of Canaan with justice. Confusing the reactionary death of Uriah with the strategic error – David’s failure, once shalom ruled in the land, to affix and establish 1. The Yovel and 2. The Federal Sanhedrin Court system.

          Hence the prophetic mussar of Shoftim/Shimshon functions to show how AFTER the first generation of Israel conquered the land and established the Yovel – starting with Yehoshua keeping Pesach and brit melah – both Torah mitzvot directly linked to keeping the Yovel – and established the Six Cities of Refuges/small Sanhedrin Federal court system which ideally judge Capital Crimes cases among and between the 12 Tribes of our people.

          The Talmud teaches, during the first 6 years of the wars of invasion Israel did not keep koshrut. The language 6 years לאו דוקא. Not till king David did Israel fully conquer the land of Canaan. As such assuming that king David understood the k’vanna of the mitzva of Moshiach, when he commanded Shlomo to build the בית המקדש – based upon the mussar rebuke of Natan/2nd Sinai commandment – David called upon his son to establish the Yovel and permanently affix the Sanhedrin Federal Court system of the Republic of 12 Tribes.

          The av tuma avoda zara of king Shlomo, no different from the generation that ruled Israel after the generation of Yehoshua passed. King Shlomo serves as a פרט to the כלל, of Israel pursuing avoda zarah rather than righteous justice among our people within the borders of the eternal inheritance lands of the chosen Cohen people. NaCH prophets command mussar – they do not teach history. This mussar by Natan’s interpretation of the 2nd Sinai commandment equally applies to all Israelis now that our people has conquered once again the land of Canaan.

          The Book of בראשית introduces Av wisdom commandments called תמיד מעשה בראשית\\זימן גרמא מצוות. Avoda zarah worships the chosen God of a particular Creed/theology belief system. Justice לא בשמים היא – the revelation of the Torah at Sinai לשמה. A man does not wake up from out of the blue and the pursuit of justice burns hot in his blood. Yovel justice first and foremost domestic, within and among the society of our people. Yovel means absolutely nothing to Goyim who never came out of the judicial oppression of Egypt!

          The revelation of the Mishkan at Sinai compares to fruit which has an external klippah. The בראשית mussar which rejects the korban of Cain, the identical mussar where the Fire from Heaven consumed the strange fire of the two sons of Aaron. Korbanot as a barbeque to heaven a direct Torah abomination. Korbanot as a wisdom time-oriented positive commandment which requires prophetic mussar that interprets Oral Torah middot which chazal labels as מלכות לשמה as the dedication of the Yatzir Ha-Tov spirits within the heart as Torah wisdom which chazal labels as k’vanna.

          Avoda zarah – the tuma middot of the Yatzir Ha-ra within the heart – confuses form for substance. Not the revelation of the Mishkan at Sinai. But the vision that the tohor middot spirits of the שם השם breath life within the Yatzir Ha-Tov hearts of our people who live within the Yovel lands of conquered Canaan. The avoda zarah of king Shlomo prioritized the tuma klippah of constructing a House of wood and stone and despised the dedication k’vanna of Oral Torah spirits/middot within the Ya’tzir Ha-Tov hearts/לבב of our people. The spelling לבב teaches the משמע mussar that the tohor spirits of our people live within our national hearts.

          The יסוד of faith stands upon יראת שמים. Av tumah avoda zarah worships Gods in the Heavens. Torah faith does not exist in the heart of any man who despises the burden of obligation to protect his ‘Good Name’ reputation. Avoda Zarah prays to Gods in the heavens to cover and conceal the sins which profane this world. Justice לשמה pursues fair restitution of damages inflicted upon others among our people.

          Just as Jefferson’s ‘Bill of Rights’ apply only to citizens of the American Republic. So too and how much more so judicial justice stands upon keeping the Yovel within our homeland. Yovel as a mitzva does not apply to Goyim in any land or country across the Planet Earth. The ‘son of God’ or ‘Arab prophet’ can proclaim declarations in ancient Harry Potter books of fiction. But where was JeZeus during the Shoah? Where was Allah during the murder of Ali ibn Abi Talib … the disgrace of ’48 Nakba? Fiction stories tell a good narrative that many fervently believe. But ‘fear of heaven’ confused as ‘fear of God(s)’; goyim theologies of fiction do not prioritize Torah constitutional Sanhedrin common law courts.

          Mikdash has no meaning by its ornate or ritualized ‘forms’ alone. Any more than a dead body buried in a grave has life. Sanhedrin courtroom common law breaths the Oral Torah tohor spirits, first heard at Horev on Yom Kippur, which move and inspire Men – to pursue and rule the land through justice; meaning fair compensation for damages inflicted upon our people. Natan’s rebuke over Uriah, not primarily about adultery and murder—but rather bypassing the Sanhedrin, acting as a “cult” king -oblivious to the k’vanna mitzva of moshiach. The latter always chooses architecture, aesthetics, and ritual over Yovel, Sanhedrin and mishpat justice.

          The Torah blessing/curse brit absolutely and most fundamentally requires that bnai brit Man accepts responsibility for his actions in this world. Avoda zarah trumpets ideal life in the world to come. Any talk of Mikdash, geulah, or “Jewish values” without a serious project of Yovel‑rooted justice and a binding Sanhedrin‑like legal framework repeats Shlomo’s av tuma avodah zarah.

          Confusing ועשו לי מקדש as Shekinah as absurd as declaring the Universe created in 6 days! The בראשית Creation aggada introduces wisdom time-oriented commandments through the משל of creation. Literally believing Genesis – a theological fabrication known as religious rhetoric.

5. 

   paraleaglenm

   June 10, 2026 at 4:10 pm

   I don’t study the Talmud, as it is a purely Jewish convention of essays written after the diaspora by rabbis, for rabbis.

   That’s a complete sentence and speaks for itself. I don’t consider the Talmud beneficial except to rabbis.

   I don’t follow Yechuda, the ‘book’ closed after the dreams Daniel interpreted were fully revealed to John, 2000 years after Abraham.

   Reply
6. 

   paraleaglenm

   June 11, 2026 at 1:54 pm

   Your studies are admirable, but the key to granularity is to find the ‘gold dust’ and separate it out.

   “The church lost this power with the 15th Century invension [sic] of the Gutenberg printing press.”

   The Roman Church paganized Christianity and that led to Mohammad calling them polytheists and idolaters. ‘If not for the Trinity of Nicaea, there would be no Islam.’

   While any rewriting or loss of the original epistles of Christ’s followers/witnesses is always in question, the bastardization of scripture and history by Mohammad is outrageous and not a subject of debate! He misinterpreted John 14:16 as many narcissistic messianic ‘prophets’ had before him, and after. The ‘paraclete’ is a major argument you can have with a Muslim.

   And Ishmael via Hagar being the true inheritor of God’s blessings? Not Isaac from Sarah? Please! And as an aside, the story of Jacob meeting up with Esau may reveal a promise of accord between the Arabs and Israelis, but not enough to cover the blood of Mohammad in his attempt to usurp God’s blessings.

   The bible and the temple had 2000 years of history and the genealogy recorded. Of course, the only remnant of the genealogy after the temple was destroyed was in Luke’s contribution to the New Testament. Say what you will about that.

   In contrast, the Koran were verses recorded during Mohammad’s ten-year reign of terror and evil in his conquest of Arabia, killing Christians, Jews, and even his own tribe. He stole their property, taxed others, stole their daughters and wives, massacred the husbands and sons. Their religious zeal and greed/lust is what cleared the path before them, defeating Iraq, Persia, the Levant, and in twenty-five years the entire world from Spain to China, leaving behind a trail of blood and mounds of skulls.

   Koran, ten-years–the bible(s), 2000 years! And the Koran is limited to its justification of war, rape, looting, assassination, and all sorts of evil; just as long as it is in the name of Allah.

   Israel’s return came out of two World Wars, finally established in 1948. While there were restrictions by the commonwealth, the nation’s right to defense supersedes them. The obliteration of the Gazan Palestinians, retaking Beirut, wiping out the IGRC . . . making Palestinians in Hebron, Bethlehem, and the West Bank ‘second class’ citizens . . . raw power like this is the only thing Muslims will understand and bring peace.

   But civil war may be coming. The Democrats are stealing elections, still (read my blogs on ‘fraud baked into the law’ via mail ballots. The Muslims are organized, armed, and have stores of food and are ready to attack U.S. infrastructure. England, France, Ireland, Brussels, Germany, all have their necks exposed to the Muslims.

   Reply