In Their Own Words and ‘Manifestos’

I was listening to Dan Bongino’s podcast #2156 in which he discusses the TIME Magazine article ‘The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign that Saved the 2020 Election’, by Mollie Ball. https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/

Attorney Norm Eisen figures prominently, from the Steele Dossier to Trump Impeachments to current criminal indictments of Trump and suing Trump supporters into bankruptcy. All part of a plan. 

Trump himself even discusses this article, quoted saying, “They used COVID and they used the mail-in ballots to steal an election. It was the third world country election like we’ve never seen before. Look at what took place.” https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/donald-trump-they-used-covid-and-they-used-the-mail-in-ballots-to-steal-an-election/

Attorney Paul Ingrassia makes a point I have broadcast, asking you to consider the fact that the entire Insurrection charge (engineered by Norm Eisen) falls apart because Trump had NO MOTIVE (mens rea) to disrupt the J6 Joint Session, but Democrats sure did! Why in HELL would Trump want to disrupt an unprecedented seven states willing to file Title 3 Objections to Biden’s certified electors? As unprecedented as that was, so was the organized attack on the Capitol; as the J6 Commission called it, the worst attack on the Capitol since 1812.

Trump was also impeached over the so-called Insurrection and the Senate failed to convict, so the Colorado ballot case was erroneous as are other cases citing the impeachment for insurrection as the basis for removal from the ballot. Indicting Trump over and over again smacks of Double Jeopardy. 

“This itself raises serious double jeopardy concerns. However, considering what we have said about the fundamentally erroneous foundation of the Eisen memorandum, it would seem to vitiate the legal theories on which every indictment that used the Eisen memorandum as its source material was based. Therefore, it is doubtful that any of the indictments lodged against Trump, considering what we have discussed about the overwhelming evidence suggesting election fraud, for one, and the lack of guilty mens rea, for two, contain arguments that would hold up in a court of law.”   https://americanmind.org/salvo/architect-of-a-sham/

In Norm Eisen’s book, ‘The Democratic Playbook,’ he details the structure of countering the Republicans through measures previously applied by the CIA to corrupt and overthrow foreign governments. One element is to have thousands of protestors on hand to react violently if necessary to claims of election fraud. BLM and Antifa come to mind, and the J6 attack on congress was not Proud Boys or Oath Keepers (they attended MAGA rallies to get between Antifa and Trump supporters, which explains the ‘stand back, stand down’ quote), but the FBI and Antifa/BLM agitators breached the Capitol violently before the Ellipse Speech rally-goers arrived on scene. https://revolver.news/2020/09/meet-norm-eisen-color-revolution/ 

CONCLUSION:

The time for ‘granularity’ and White Papers is over.

Not only is the Vote-By-Mail fraud created by Democrats and Dominion Voting Systems still ‘legalized,’ Blue States have enacted new laws to make Vote-By-Mail even more pervasive. Legislative action is impossible because Democrats used the Vote-By-Mail fraud to steal the Senate in 2022. In New Mexico, legislation passed making applying for an absentee ballot unnecessary; if you applied previously your ballot will automatically be mailed to you. Other states are copying Washington state and Colorado, mass-mailing mail ballots. 

And, of course, under the 2005 Help America Vote Act, states are mandated to accept voter registrations without ID, no Proof of Identity, No Driver’s License . . . No SS# . . . and millions of illegal aliens have entered the country, issued phones and debit cards, and able to register to vote and apply for absentee ballots using Paper Applications provided by eoc.gov and eforms.com. 

There is only one action left to save the 2024 election, and that is a U.S. Supreme Court case challenging Mail Ballot Abuse under the Equal Protection Clause. Not only is chain-of-custody of mail ballots and tabulation by ‘election workers’ abhorrent compared to In-Person Voting (recall the Maricopa fiasco in 2022, and the absolute mess in Fulton County), my WordPress blog ‘Loopholes in Voter Registration Law’ describes how paper voter applications are impossible to verify and of inferior quality to applications made digitally on-line.

Kari Lake and the Republicans of Maricopa County are obvious choices to join the Petition as Maricopa County set their Ballot-On-Demand machines to print the wrong sized ballot, forcing voters to wait, leave, or deposit their unvoted ballots in a bin for being ‘voted’ by election workers contracted by Katie Hobbs. They voted In-Person to avoid having their ballots mishandled and voted by election workers, and that intent was defeated when their ballots were rejected. And, the Arizona court demanded Kari Lake to prove the miscalibration of ballot size was intentional (mens rea) as an element of proving their case. Mens Rea is an argument helping prove a crime was committed, but it is not an essential element.

In my opinion, those challenging ballot handling, especially ballots counted by election workers and mass mailed off corrupt and bloated voter rolls need only present a Prima Facie case showing the mail ballot and ballot counting system is so flawed that election integrity is in question. Ballot rejections and adjudication of the mail ballot were way outside of federal election standards. The absentee mail ballot must be returned to 4% levels, or as close to that as possible . . . not 40% to 98% of the vote!

There is extensive data and other reports of the rejection rate of mail ballots, duplicate scans, highly questionable ‘digital adjudication’ created by Dominion Voting Systems that allows a ‘spoiled ballot’ to be ‘re-voted’ on a workstation display, virtually ‘Photoshopping’ the ballot in question, ‘re-voting’ it in seconds . . . and the U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled against Disenfranchisement of Qualified Citizen Voters and Ballot Harvesting (Brnovich vs DNC, 2021), and the use of signature verification is outright fraud in itself, relying entirely on the discretion (or abuse of discretion) of election workers. 

Leonard Daneman