Simply put he is not a ‘natural born citizen,’ his loyalties foreign and rife with anti-American sentiments cultivated from birth. His work as a community organizer in South Chicago did nothing to improve what is still a war zone, and his entre’ into politics was aided by 60’s radicals Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn. Ayers was once on the FBI’s Ten Most Wanted list, and his wife, Dohrn, a leader in the Weather Underground who publicly celebrated the Manson Murders, was connected to bomb-making, riots, attacks on Federal buildings, and the murder of two  policemen.

It is impossible not to see the similarities between Weather tactics and Antifa; the fomenting of black rage, assassination of police, burning of government buildings, and use of bombs.  It almost sounds like a recipe for the riots of 2014 through 2020, and the January 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol.  

Former president Barack Obama has been corrupting elections going back to his ‘community organizer’ days. Keep in mind that Obama was born to communist parents and educated as a Muslim in an Indonesian madrasah, his first college years matriculating as a foreign student; and he was most likely born in Kenya. There are Mombasa birth documents that appear genuine, but authentication has been blocked by courts and Obama’s state department.

Even when the senate investigation into John McCain’s constitutional Article II eligibility concluded it was his U.S. citizen father that made him a natural born citizen, ‘experts’ and leadership still are quick to say ‘being born in the United States’ makes a person eligible to be president. That is false; ‘birthright’ citizenship was created unconstitutionally by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1898, not the 14th Amendment in 1869.

Obama was conferred U.S. citizenship from revisions in the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, specifically a provision for U.S. citizenship-at-birth from a U.S. citizen mother with specific age and U.S. residency requirements bearing an out-of-wedlock child outside the United States. (8 U.S.C. 1409(c)) Coincidently, Ted Cruz gained his citizenship-at-birth from similar revisions. (INA § 301 g.)

Obama’s mother was under 18-years old when ‘married’ to Obama, Sr., who was already married to a Kenyan woman. Therefore, the Obama-Dunham marriage was void ab initio due to bigamy. This is why a Kenyan-born Obama qualified for Stanley Dunham’s U.S. citizenship, as he was born out-of-wedlock. But, to put technicalities aside, Obama relied on the Hawaiian ‘Registration of Live Birth’ to claim being ‘native born.’

Most politicians stick to the narrative that Obama was born in Hawaii and therefore a natural born citizen. (To do otherwise would result in massive media outcry and public ridicule, which Donald Trump knows all too well.) However, Obama’s birth documents presented during his presidential campaign were only ‘live birth registrations,’ different from a Birth Certificate by lacking a witness’s signature from a licensed birthing facility. (See Haw Rev Stat §338-17.8) Obama’s April 27, 2011 ‘long form’ birth certificate, posted on the White House website to end the controversy, was determined to be a forgery faked in Adobe Illustrator.

Again, the U.S. senate, in its bi-partisan SR511 report on John McCain’s Article II eligibility, concluded correctly that being born in Colon, Panama did not disqualify McCain from the presidency, as natural born citizenship (since the formation of the United States and not changed by any amendment) devolved solely from the father.

14 responses to “WHY OBAMA WORKED TO ‘TRANSFORM’ ELECTIONS”

  1. I have two important points to add. The first is that the fellow who obtained the African birth certificate recounted in his story of his effort that he offered the Dept. of Health office $5,000 if they could provide him a copy within an hour. Well, they managed to do so… thanks to the internet, but although it was “official” it was also fraudulent. But hey! Who can blame them? For that kind of money, I might do the same.

    Second, Obama did not receive any kind of U.S. citizenship until he turned 18 years old. The reason was that he didn’t quality for the citizenship-though-a-single-US citizen-mother. The reason that he didn’t quality is because he had no birth certificate to prove his parentage…or anything else for that matter.
    Once he moved back to Hawaii at age 10 the clock began ticking toward permanent citizenship (as apposed to the provisional citizenship he enjoyed as the son of a US citizen mother living in US territory).
    If, at age 18, a youth had been living with his mother in the US for five years, then provisional citizenship became permanent. It took me over three years to finally find this information.

    You can learn a lot more in my exposition about his birth titled: Why Baby Obama Was Born in Vancouver. It’s at h2ooflife.wordpress.com

    1. I heard nothing about any $5000. He did, if I recall correctly, send copies to legislators. They did not respond, which is no surprise. I contacted 88 legislators proving Obama was not a NBC, but only 3 responded: one from Florida, one through a constituent friend in Texas, and a Michigan senator who sent me a long legal memorandum in response, disagreeing, but using a lower court judge’s declaratory statement as precedent; which, of course, had no legal binding over a century of how citizenship at birth was understood since 1790, devolving solely through the father.
      My letter to Thaddeus McCotter is posted on this WordPress blog.
      A writer I was doing research for, Dr. Jerome Corsi, flew to Kenya in order to repeat acquiring Obama’s birth documents. However, Obama and Hillary had Corsi detained by Kenyan authorities at the airport and ordered him flown back to the United States. In addition, the Kenyan office of Vital Records was ordered to deny access to any records pertaining to Obama’s birth. Later, 4.72.11, a few weeks before Corsi’s book was to be released (5.11.11) the Obama White House posted a forged Long Form Birth Certificate, its fakery uncovered the very same day as the forger forgot to ‘flatten’ the image file before converting to PDF. I still have that 4.27 PDF file and when you open it in Adobe Illustrator, you can see all the steps done to create the forgery. If you know how to use Illustrator or Photoshop, you will know what ‘flatten’ means and how it erases ‘histories’ of ‘art layers.’
      If you go back through my posts, you can take a tour of Obama’s nationalities @ https://wordpress.com/post/paraleaglenm.wordpress.com/355
      Obama had citizenship-at-birth thanks to a revision to the 1940 INA, taking effect in 1952.
      Obama had Kenyan/British citizenship through his father, a fact Obama admitted in one of his autobiographies.
      When Dunham married in Indonesia, she automatically became a citizen there (according to their constitution) and the minor children were naturalized by the same law. However, Obama regained his citizenship lost as a minor when he fulfilled a required continuous 5-year residency between the ages of 14 and 21.
      Again, I detail in a timeline all the nationalities and applicable laws in the linked post.

      1. “Obama had citizenship-at-birth thanks to a revision to the 1940 INA”
        Citizenship does not actually exist except when verifiable. If it’s not verifiable then it’s presumed to not exist. So Obama had no citizenship in any nation since no nation recognized his existence due to the absence of a birth certificate. He was a stateless person of unknown origin (no DNA testing back then) although a blood test may have been able to link him to his mother but no such test was ever done in regard to his nationality.

        So while he may have been eligible under the 1940 INA, his mother couldn’t take advantage of it since he had no birth certificate verifying parentage. So his status was exactly as I stated in my previous comment.
        As for a Kenyan birth certificate, none existed (it was fabricated just like his fake American one) because his 17 y.o mother did NOT travel to Africa alone while Obama Sr. remained in Hawaii in school, was NOT married in reality, did NOT ever live with the “father” (who might actually have been Frank Marshall Davis) and a mere three weeks after giving birth the two are strangely living in Seattle alone.
        All of the known details point to only one possibility, and that is that he was born in Vancouver, BC. I lay it all out in a step-by-step accounting that even his top internet defenders were not able to debunk over a course of 1,500 comments.

        As for British citizenship through Obama Sr., -that would not have existed in the real world because Sr. would not have registered him with the British Consulate in Hawaii (mandatory) since he and Ann were not a real couple and not really married in the real world. And he would have assumed that American citizenship through his mother was quite sufficient.
        But there is zero testimony from anyone that Sr. Obama knew where and when Ann gave birth. But he did mention to his INS officer that they were considering adoption… again, proof that no ‘family’ was contemplated… since he was already married with children.

        Lastly, Obama did not become an Indonesian citizen through his mother’s marriage. Under Indonesian law, that is only allowed up to four years of age, but Jr. was already five, so his Indonesian father legally adopted him.

        You really, really need to investigate the almost bottomless well of Obama info found in my massive blog… along with a few hundred expositions about the nature of citizenship.

        Click to access why-baby-obama-was-born-in-vancouver.pdf

      2. In my blogpost detailing the law and timeline of Obama’s various nationalities, if born in Hawaii Obama, Sr. would have two years to register the child with a British clerk or lose British citizenship at birth. If born in Kenya, the Mombasa docs are signed and sealed. So, either way he was never ‘stateless.’
        If you read the Certification of Live Birth issued to Stanley Dunham, it accepts the sworn statement of Dunham concerning Obama’s date of birth and place of birth . . . at the bottom of the form it says the information is ‘prima facie’ evidence.
        What that means is the sworn Hawaiian birth statement is considered legal and fact, unless successfully challenged in a court of proper jurisdiction. So, both the Mombasa and Hawaiian docs are legal, but in conflict with each other.

      3. You have failed to consider the limitations of your own statement… which is couched in the conditional realm of “if”. If this and if that… then “either way he was never ‘stateless.’ ” That claim ignores the prior conditional requirements and states a conclusion as a fact, when it is not a fact.

        It wouldn’t matter if obama sr. had a decade to register his assumed son. He never did it because he was never going to be father to that unwanted and unexpected child that he hoped would get adopted. So there’s no basis to assume British citizenship… or ‘subjectship’ as it was at the time.

        “the sworn Hawaiian birth statement is considered legal and fact”. “…both the Mombasa and Hawaiian docs are legal”. That statement is ignoring the fact that there never was any long-form paper birth certificate from Hawaii, no ‘document’ at all… so that which never existed (until the digital file was printed at the White House) can’t be called a “legal” document.

        The “sworn Hawaiian birth statement” was lifted from the only document that the governor’s searchers were able to find, which was a page half written and half typed.
        That page was the attempted filing for a late birth certificate by Ann Dunham. She wrote out her claim of a home birth in Hawaii with no medical person attending. But the law required that an unrelated witness verify the claim… which would be the basis for presumed citizenship.
        No such witness existed because the home-birth claim was a lie to try to get her son a birth certificate along with US citizenship.

        A DoH worker took her hand-written statement (affidavit) and typed it out on the same page, and had her sign it under penalty of perjury. Ann never returned with a witness because there was none. Hence, no legitimate birth certificate was ever issued for Barack Obama, and he still lacks one to this day. His sole identity verification during his years at least up to law school was his Indonesian passport… adopted Indonesian citizen, along perhaps with a driver’s license from California.

        We don’t even know, and will never know, is if he applied for a citizenship certificate from the INS upon or after turning 18 years old. He might not have, but should have eventually.
        Somewhere in the old INS archive there may be a record of such an application, along with its proof of residency.
        That would be not a ‘smoking gun’ but a ‘firing’ gun… aimed right at the heart of his fraudulent eligibility for the presidency.

      4. The Haw Rev Stat §338-17.8 form was the very first birth document presented by Obama during his first presidential campaign. It was a database printout, not the original Hawaii clerk signed form.
        I have an image of a faxed copy of the original 338-17.8 form that is signed by Dunham’s mother (Madelyn) and a Martin Blaine Ericson, both signatures on Aug 8, 1961, and the claimed date of birth being Aug 4, 1961 and place of birth a Kenyan hospital, identified as “unknown.”
        Sometime after, the typewritten files were copied to a computer database, which is where the Registration of Live Birth presented in 2008 came from . . . after Hillary Clinton and Phil Berg complained Obama was not a U.S. citizen.
        If you find that computer printout, the bottom of it stipulates that the Document is Prima Facie Evidence . . . which means the officials and courts consider it true and factual unless challenged with new evidence in a court of proper jurisdiction. Having the Kenyan documents verified in a U.S. court communicating with a Kenyan court was tried, but the judge denied the motion.

        The 338-17.8 form is sufficient to claim ‘native birth,’ even though the document identifies Kenya as birthplace, especially as the computer printout doesn’t include the ‘born in Kenya’ information.
        If Kenya is the birthplace, I cited the 1952 INA law that confers the U.S. citizen mother’s citizenship to the foreign born, of an alien father, to the child.
        So, Obama had both British and U.S. citizenship at birth.

        Nevertheless, we can stipulate that Obama, Sr. was the putative father, which in the law denies Obama ‘natural born citizenship’ status. That is plain, the law as the framers knew it, and they intentionally avoided ‘native born’ and instead chose ‘natural born,’ as even in 1790 a child of a British subject born on U.S. soil was NOT a U.S. citizen, under both U.S. and British (1772 Act) nationality laws.

        So, all this argument over suppressed and hidden birth documents is a smoke screen because the ‘official narrative’ is not the true law, but merely raising Obama up as ‘born in the United States’ being the qualification for president, when merely having a non-citizen father disqualified him.

      5. “If Kenya is the birthplace,… Obama had both British and U.S. citizenship at birth.”
        More exactitude is needed to correctly parse the actual facts of the case via correct word choice. Instead of using the word “birthplace” (which of itself, without verification, conveys nothing).
        So the point is that it is only true to say that he was born with British and US citizenship if the necessary *conditions* were met; which were: verified birth in Kenya and verified birth to a US citizen mother.
        The problem is that there is no verification of either requirement, and therefore citizenship was not vested in him since his origin (both biological and locational) were not established by any verifiable authority… although the Kenyan birth certificate is likely legitimate, it is also likely fraudulent due to the inducement of $5,000.

        As for the fake Certification of Live Birth, “It was a database printout” That is very likely not accurate. Remember, the governor said that they only found ONE record, the one that was half hand-written and half-typed. It would not have been entered into any database since it was not a digitization of a microfiche image of a birth certificate. It was in an archived “Pending” folder somewhere.

        Also, those documents do not contain any signatures at all. They are nothing but text and a date stamp along with an official seal embossed image.
        here’s a quote from my blog page debunking it:

        *Birth Certificate is an Obvious Fake*
        Sorry to disabuse you folks, but this birth certificate on dailykos is an obvious fake.
        The fake “birth certificate” just appeared Thursday morning on dailykos without any reference as to who released it or where it came from. There is no explanation as to who vouches for its origins or its authenticity.

        There are image artifacts consistent with forgeries and image processing. It’s not a real, unprocessed scan of a birth certificate. It’s not certified. Hawaii state code provides that certificates issued by the department of health be certified:
        “§338-13 Certified copies. (a) Subject to the requirements of sections 338-16, 338-17, and 338-18, the department of health shall, upon request, furnish to any applicant a certified copy of any certificate, or the contents of any certificate, or any part thereof. ”

        And here’s a hilarious fake version of that fake that took me about half an hour to create. It’ll give you a good laugh. https://h2ooflife.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/obama-fake-colb.jpg

        I appreciate the fact that you have not been duped by Mario Apuzzo into believing that place-of-birth conveys anything other than the bastardized version of subjecthood instituted in Britain because of their no-heir-to-the-throne problem in the early 1600’s and the resultant confusion as to who was a natural born Englishman when suddenly Scotsmen were added to the realm of the newly ordained ruler of both nations.
        That king, James, switched from recognizing only the children of his subjects as being his new natural born subjects to recognizing anyone born within his sovereign territory. That’s when the unfixable confusion began.
        “Natural-hyphen-born subject does not equal Natural born citizen…as I’ve explained in a few hundred thousand words of exposition found in my blog (h2ooflife.wordpress.com

      6. The database printout appears to be genuine, and was submitted by Obama’s campaign staff and mentioned in one of his autobiographies.
        The ‘faxed’ copy of the original, signed 338-17.8 Certification of Live Birth appears to be genuine, but I can’t trace its source.
        So, regardless of your ‘legal standards of proof,’ Obama was granted U.S. native birth status.

        The Mombasa docs were requested by a U.S. citizen, a black tourist. Obama’s brother, Malik, also had a copy. So, unless Obama requests the docs and presents them, your ‘legal standard of proof’ isn’t met again.

        Even the U.S. government, congress, the U.S. Supreme Court haven’t been able or willing to investigate to meet your standards.

        Here is my timeline of Obama’s nationalities and supporting laws. https://nation.africa/kenya/news/barack-obama-s-brother-shares-fake-kenya-birth-certificate-371496

        If you like Mario Apuzzo, I also have a blog post on his conclusions on Obama’s status.

        In the end, regardless of ‘place of birth’ bullshit, the fact Obama had a Kenyan citizen father disqualified him from the presidency.

      7. “Obama’s brother, Malik, also had a copy.”

        I can’t discuss this issue with you because you keep stating things that are incorrect. Malik, “tweeted” an image of the fake Kenyan B.C. He did NOT have a copy. Examine your own link and read it for yourself.
        Also, the short-form certification is NOT signed by anyone. It is merely a certification of the info presented, not a visual verification of it.

        “database printout appears to be genuine”

        Yeah, what President is going to present an obvious fake??? If I present a counterfeit currency bill, does it look fake or real? So appearances mean nothing until you get down to the pixel level… which I dealt with a lot.

        “If you like Mario Apuzzo,…”
        me: “I appreciate the fact that you have not been DUPED by Mario Apuzzo…”
        Apuzzo is willfully self-deluded. I had to correct him so many times that he blocked me from commenting. But he doesn’t care about being wrong as long as he doesn’t have to recant any of his authoritative dogma about the “necessity” of native birth. Is his website still up? Mine is.

      8. You are missing everything.
        The Certification form is merely from a database created on new computer systems, clerks copying data from old hand-typed forms from the 60’s into the new database.
        Note that ‘Date Filed By Registrar’ is August 8,, 1961, Dunham’s mother claiming the date of birth was August 4, 1961. The database printout, pictured above, is not signed because it is not the original signed document, only signed by Madilyn Dunham and one other person, not signed by Stanley Ann Dunham. Note that the Certification mentions no hospital or licensed birthing facility, which is why the 338-17.8 statute was used to register Obama’s birth.
        The ‘long form’ posted on April 27, 2011 was discovered to be a fake (which is a felony) on the very day it was posted. I have a copy of the 4/27/11 pdf, and if you open it up in the proper Adobe program (Illustrator) all of the pieces of other birth certificates used to compile the forgery are shown, some in color, some in 1-bit black and white snippets of images. Signatures and dates are pasted into the forgery, rotated and resized to fit . . . anyone who uses Photoshop knows what these snippets are, especially when the ‘histories’ of editing are saved in a sidebar window showing the actions taken to the ‘art layers.’ These sidebar windows are visible when the file is opened in Illustrator.
        What happened was when the forger saved the file for upload, he/she neglected to ‘flatten’ the image. When you ‘flatten’ an image that has multiple layers of ‘art’ all those layers are converted to a single file format (a 1-bit black and white scan will be converted to 8-bit sRGB color) and the window of ‘histories’ will be deleted.
        Obama had the fake birth certificate posted in order to kill sales of Jerome Corsi’s book, that was set for release on May 5, 2011. When the fake was posted, all of Corsi’s interviews and promotional tours were cancelled, as was distribution of the book.
        Using a felonious federal form to commit fraud, in this case Tortious Interference with Contract, could not be prosecuted because Obama was president. WorldNetDaily, the publishing house, was destroyed by Obama’s felony.
        The Kenyan birth certificate is signed in hospital and dated Aug 4, 1961 at 7:24AM. The half-brother Malik confirms this, as did the grandmother in a family interview, saying she witnessed the birth.

        FINALLY, all this is moot because liberal courts, political judges, and the State Department have banned the Kenyan doc from being verified, and all access to Mombasa vital records are now blocked.

        Again, Place of Birth has ZERO to do with presidential eligibility . . . only if the father is a U.S. citizen or not. Obama, Sr. was a Kenyan with British nationality, and a Muslim Marxist who had no issues with bigamy (he married a second U.S. citizen later while still married in Kenya) or lying. He lied to the Harvard registrar who were going to cancel his matriculation due to marrying Stanley Ann Dunham while still married in Kenya.

        You can’t be president if born to a foreign national father . . . period.

        https://www.texastribune.org/2011/04/27/texas-pol-still-isnt-satisfied-on-obama-birthplace/

      9. “clerks copying data from old hand-typed forms from the 60’s into the new database.”
        That is not correct. No copying by clerks was ever done. Rather, the age of Microfiche arrived, and all records were copied to microfilm en mass via an automated process. Then later, when the digital age arrived, all of the microfilm images were digitized and that information became the modern computer database.
        That being the case, Fuddy lied to everyone by claiming that she watched/witnessed the copying of the original birth certificate. That did not ever happen since the only copying ever done was of text imagery of one’s original birth certificate from the digital file. But since Obama had no birth certificate, the info from his mother’s affidavit was copied and used to create the fake file which was printed twice as two copies that were supposedly real.

        “-which is why the 338-17.8 statute was used to register Obama’s birth.”
        That also is not correct. His birth was NEVER registered anywhere except in Vancouver, B.C. but that record was probably burned 15 years ago.
        He was not officially recognized by any government until his Indonesian step-father officially adopted him. His Indonesian passport was his only identity into adulthood. It was all he needed, -at least until he learned to drive a car. But we know nothing about that.

      10. Look at the official Certification of Live Birth. It is a form output with datapoints accessed from databases created by workers transcribing data from the original typewritten forms, or microfiche, and printed out.
        Microfiche came out before computers, but when computers were introduced the data was transcribed, by hand, into the new databases.

        Considering the facsimile image actually specifying Haw Stat Rev 338-17.8, and my research involving a Hawaiian who visited a Hawaiian vital records office, that is the statute required to register a foreign birth to confer U.S. citizenship to a Hawaiian citizen mother. All states have a version of this statute, and it is why the Hawaiian registration date of Aug 8 is four days after the ‘date of birth,’ which was highly likely Kenya.

        Setting all of this nonsense aside, which cannot be settled without review in a court of proper jurisdiction, . . .

        . . . this birth certificate issue clouded the simple truth that Obama, Jr was NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN simply because his father was not a U.S. citizen. It is that simple, and goes back to the laws as they stood in 1798, 1790, and for the next 108 years . . . Obama under those laws would not even be a citizen. Obama’s citizenship was created by force of naturalization law in 1952.

        Natural Born Citizenship requires a U.S. Citizen Father, period. That is all that needed to be communicated back in 2008 . . . and the Senate SR511 bipartisan study determined that when John McCain’s natural born citizenship was challenged.

  2. I assume that the text contained within the Microfiche imagery was convertible into digital information by the digitization software, not by a thousand clerks typing for a thousand years… so to speak. So once all of the several million birth certificate images were converted then digital versions were available from office desktop computers and printers. Everything was in the database, so Fuddy lied when she claimed to have witnessed what the public expected, namely the ‘copying’ of the original birth certificate… which did not exist in physical form or digital form.

    The problem is the ignorance of the public that thinks that native birth is equal to natural born citizenship inheritance.
    Once Obama backed McCain’s eligibility, McCain was not about to not return the favor even if he knew that his endorsement was in violation of the Constitution.

    1. Yes . . . people were hired to transcribe the basic birth data from hand-typed birth certificates into databases.

Leave a comment