wong kim ark

Dear Rep. McCotter, January of 2009, you replied to my fax/e-mail to 77 Republican congressmen, begging just two of them, as required by Title 3 § 15, to submit a single-page letter to the President of the Senate challenging Barack Hussein Obama’s Electoral Votes based on his Article II eligibility, vis-à-vis Sen. McCain in SR511, and Minor…

THE FIRST ELIGIBILITY CASE (1789)

Apr 29, 2011

Uncategorized

14th Amendment, 1866 Civil Rights Act, Case of Mr. Smith, citizenship at birth, dissent Wong Kim Ark, Dissertation, Eligibility, Fuller, Ramsay’s, Ramsey’s, wong kim ark

Important Update: In his comment section at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/, Mario Apuzzo reveals what I expected, that even though Madison won an argument that Mr. Smith was a citizen based on ‘place of birth’ principles, Madison would have followed the 1790 Act passed 10-months later requiring a U.S. citizen parent . . . birthplace not being an…

Fax this Memo to your Congressman

Feb 24, 2011

Uncategorized

american colonies, Art 2, article 2, Article II, Barack Hussein Obama, birthright citizenship, British subject, citizenship at birth, common law, Eligibility, jurisprudence, lynch, minor vs. happersette, native-born citizen, natural born citizen, wong kim ark

The concept of birthright U.S. citizenship by native-birth alone is a carryover from English law as practiced by the American colonies, but superseded by the 1790 Uniform Naturalization Act that relied on the ‘Law of Nation’s’ § 212 description of “those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.” The reason ‘native-born citizen’ is…

My E-Mail to Rep. Thaddeus McCotter

THE FIRST ELIGIBILITY CASE (1789)

Fax this Memo to your Congressman