October of 2021, I submitted a legal memorandum to New Mexico legislators by mail, and personally discussing the issue at RNC HQ. The proofs in the memo were not taken seriously enough, as repealing the 2018 Absent Voter Act would require a NM Supreme Court decision.
Instead, Republicans hoped for a Red Wave in 2022, which failed because the mail ballot fraud and illegal aliens in the voter database overcame even record turnouts. I proved that the Absent Voter Act was designed to only benefit Democrats, as only they were willing to violate the law through abuse of bloated voter rolls and registering illegal aliens to vote. Republicans could not do this, and increasing mail ballots through ‘harvesting’ was not only expensive, but a ‘zero sum gain.’ Converting in-person voters to ‘vote by mail’ would not only fail to increase ‘votes,’ but expose the mail ballots to chain-of-custody losses through USPS negligence, and Dominion scanners rejecting ballots.
In fact, the doubling of ‘mail ballots’ in many states translated to a tripling of Democrat mail ballots, no increase in Republican mail ballots!
Re: NMSA (1978) ABSENT VOTER ACT Article 6, Sec 1-6-1. AS AMENDED 2018
Establishing the principle of “one person, one vote,” the Court stated that “the Constitution visualizes no preferred class of voters but equality among those who meet the basic qualifications.” Reynolds v. Sims, 377, 380 U.S. 533, 568 (1964); Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368, 379–81 (1963); Baker, 369 U.S. at 228–29. 3 Gray, 372 U.S. at 381. 4 Id. at 380; see also Reynolds, 377 U.S. at 555 (“[T]he right of suffrage can be denied by a debasement or dilution of the weight of a citizen’s vote just as effectively as by wholly prohibiting the free exercise of the franchise.”); as cited from http://harvardlawreview.org/…/2016/11/387-396_Online.pdf
On its face, the Absent Voter Act is in violation of NM Const Art IV, Sec. 24.
Local and special laws. “The legislature shall not pass local or special laws in any of the following cases: . . . the opening or conducting of any election or designating the place of voting;
Fraud Must be Avoided Preemptively Because Post-Election Remedies Extend Beyond Mandated Time Limits for Certification
Congress has known for over a decade, through expert testimony, that computerized voting is vulnerable to fraud.[1] Software programmer says US elections are rigged and that US Representatives tried to pay him to rig their election vote counts. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnjFrMx-DR4
NM Const. Bill of Rights Sec. 2. Rights and privileges. No member of this state shall be disfranchised or deprived of any of the rights or privileges secured to any citizen thereof, unless by the law of the land or the judgment of his peers.
NM Const Art II, Sec 8: The supreme right guaranteed by state constitution is the right of a citizen to vote at public elections. State ex rel. Walker v. Bridges, 1921-NMSC-041, 27 N.M. 169, 199 P. 370
“There’s a tremendous chain of custody issue that every voter should be concerned about,” said Illinois Representative Rodney Davis, the top Republican on the House Administration Committee. He has introduced federal legislation to prevent ballot harvesting. “The chain of custody that has to be taken into consideration because our ballot is so much more important — we have to understand how it gets to its final counting spot.” See also, Justice Alito, writing for the majority, noted that states have a legitimate interest in preventing voter fraud and that these policies work to prevent such fraud. “Fraud can affect the outcome of a close election, and fraudulent votes dilute the right of citizens to cast ballots that carry appropriate weight,” the Court continued. “Fraud can also undermine public confidence in the fairness of elections and the perceived legitimacy of the announced outcome.”
These quotes are from a memorandum I submitted to the NM legislature Oct of 2021. It concluded that abuse, unlimited use, of absentee ballots was wide open to fraud and, as an inferior ballot of poor chain-of-custody, disenfranchised ‘qualified citizen voters.’
If the vote is the primary civil right of a citizen, then ‘disenfranchisement’ through fraud is the ultimate civil rights offense! We are no longer citizens! We have been displaced by a political party committing fraud through non-citizens.
Thank you for considering this presentation of law proving excessive or unlimited use of mail ballots is rife with fraud and disenfranchisement of ‘qualified citizen voters,’ i.e., STEALING ELECTIONS. You can read the entire memorandum with citations and exhibits here: https://paraleaglenm.com/2021/10/10/how-the-new-absent-voter-laws-are-unconstitutional/
Paralegalnm's Blog 
Leave a comment