Re: 2018 Absent Voter Ballot Act and Electronic Adjudication
February, 2020, Gov. Ducey of Arizona signed into law ‘electronic adjudication’ of rejected ballots.[1] What Republicans failed to anticipate was the scanners were ‘tweaked’ by Dominion Voting Systems to reject ballots at a rate far above Voting System Standards. The usual rejection rate of 0.0008% suddenly transformed to as much as 68%.[2]
What is Electronic Adjudication? Instead of election workers re-voting a ‘spoiled’ ballot on a fresh ballot, the rejected Dominion scanner image is manipulated on a computer screen. This reduces the adjudication process from 12-minutes to 30-seconds; and, it adds voting on a ‘fake ballot’ (a felony) to the felony of ‘voting another person’s absentee ballot.’
Dominion voting system is a Canadian owned company with global subsidiaries. It is owned by Staple Street Capital which is in turn owned by UBS Securities LLC, of which 3 out of their 7 board members are Chinese nationals. The Dominion software is licensed from Smartmatic which is a Venezuelan owned and controlled company. Dominion Server locations have been determined to be in Serbia, Canada, the US, Spain and Germany. (See ‘Unverified Evidence’ image inserted on the last page.) https://www.depernolaw.com/uploads/2/7/0/2/27029178/antrim_michigan_forensics_report_[121320]_v2_[redacted].pdf
Absentee ballots, once rare and for specific excused absences from in-person voting, became a significant contribution to election results. In New Mexico, the 600K turnout in 2018 became 900K in 2020, and the normal 20% absentee ballot (still too high) jumped to over 40%.
In Pennsylvania, late counted absentee ballots took Biden from half of Trump’s votes to passing Trump by 1.2%. In fact, 60% of Biden’s votes were ‘by mail.’
Demands for an Arizona-style audit in Pennsylvania have been vigorously blocked.
In 2018, the Doña Ana County Clerk was unable to process the mail ballots, let alone legally verify thousands of ballot applications. How much more difficult was it in 2020?[3]
This is especially of concern with County Clerks relying solely on manual checking the birth date and signature, and every mailed application (funded by Zuckerberg through ‘The Center for Voter Information’) having to be answered by hand. In comparison, applications through the Secretary of State office require four ID-points and are verified instantly off a database.
Audits take too long, and the evidence required to determine a legal standard of fraud is impossible and an unreasonable burden, ‘an ounce of prevention worth a pound of cure.’ Any voting rule or revision of statute that opens the door to potential fraud, or permits an otherwise felonious act, must be repealed.
In the Arizona Audit, almost 80,000 mail ballots were in question, 34,000 envelope images were duplicates, and thousands more without signatures, or with just squiggly lines, but were counted instead of rejected.
Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, an MIT-educated engineer hired as an audit investigator, also testified on Friday that over 34,000 duplicate ballot envelopes cast by just 17,126 individual voters in 2020 election were counted in Maricopa County. https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/arizona-election-audit-reveals-more-than-50000-problematic-ballots-election-files-deleted/
A Pennsylvania court recently declared that the No Excuse Absentee Ballot was unconstitutional. Because they are of a lower standard to in-person voting, they are vulnerable to fraud and unconstitutional disenfranchisement of qualified voters. Also, knowing the Election Night results gives mail ballot election workers a target for the win, if they are cheating.
In 2020, it was reported that the workers at the adjudication table were blocked from view of the bipartisan observers, while the ‘rejected’ or ‘spoiled’ ballots were set aside, and the workers essentially voting a new ballot. Again, last I heard, voting for someone else is unlawful. See NMSA 1978 Ch 1 Art 20 § 1-20-8, and § 1-20-8.1
Conclusion:
The Absent Voter ballot is so different from the In-Person ballot that its use must be limited to its original intent: to accommodate qualified voters who cannot get to polls due to illness, extended foreign business, or military deployment.
Indictments are slowly being filed concerning the Democrats penetrating the Trump administration with unlawful and fraudulent surveillance, and one could safely say that the ‘Insurrection’ truly started when Donald Trump came down the escalator at Trump Tower, 2015. This ‘Insurrection’ may very well include the legislation lobbied to increase vote-by-mail, and electronic adjudication.
The massive expansion to No Excuse absentee voting makes it difficult to impossible to verify a qualified voter, and with the Real ID Act being pushed back to 2023, even citizenship is unverifiable. Those unqualified, or unverifiable voters, unconstitutionally disenfranchise qualified voters.
And, as we’ve seen from various audits, the Secretary of State and county election workers have a problem with records and operation, and have been caught deleting millions of records.
An in-person vote is timely, contemporaneous, and with zero chain-of-custody issues prior to tabulation. The absentee mail ballot is just the opposite, and its abuse comes from machine, electronic, and human ‘error.’
More articles:
Unsubstantiated Evidence
This Schedule D SEC data suggesting UBS invested $400,000,000 in Dominion prior to the 2020 election has been ‘debunked’ by USA Today fact checkers, but while the ‘UBS’ name is shared by several entities, they are all actually connected.
Here is a ‘retraction’ by a WordPress blog, that doesn’t dismiss the insinuations of Chinese involvement, and an interest, in the 2020 election outcome, but merely better defines it:
UPDATE: This article has been retracted, as we have discovered it is inaccurate to say that UBS Securities LLC bought a controlling interest in Dominion. Neither is it a subsidiary of UBS Securities Co. LTD, which is 75% Chinese government owned. The other 25%, however, is owned by UBS AG, a large Swiss multinational, which is the owner of UBS Securities LLC. Questions still arise worthy of investigation, anytime near one-half billion dollars moves in the direction of the company at the heart of the most disputed election in American history, exactly one month before that election. But accuracy is important when only the truth is on your side.
It is true that Andy Huang, Dominion’s Core Infrastructure Manager of Information Technology, previously worked for China Telecom, a Chinese-military affiliated company.
It is also true that one of Sidney Powell’s Georgia witnesses, a former US Army 305th Military Intelligence Officer, has presented evidence of Chinese government hacking into the UA 2020 election.
[1] https://www.azmirror.com/blog/ducey-signs-electronic-adjudication-bill-to-speed-ballot-counting/?fbclid=IwAR0JoMQtA0CzTxXP2K2Hfxr-wMrhljv3X2habSyZozkIBpPtAjbEVdYMc9A
[2] “The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity,” the report states. “The results of the Antrim County 2020 election are not certifiable. This is a result of machine and/or software error, not human error.” https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2020/12/15/new-report-says-dominion-voting-systems-has-a-remarkably-high-error-rate-n2581624
Paralegalnm's Blog 
Leave a comment